Russia has been a doomed nation since the Mongols. Every time nomads conquer settled peoples, they always meld and change to fit into the cultures they conquer. Except with Russia, where the process happened in reverse. The extractive institutions of the Mongol Empire stayed with Russia forever.
The raison d'etre of the Russian state is and has always been the utter domination of its subjects, and the raison d'etre of the Russian is to be a flimsy puppet in the iron vice grip of the Tsar, General-Secretary, or President. The exception that proves the rule is the Russian Revolution. It speaks volumes that the ONE time the Russian people decide they're not going to take it anymore, tried to take their destiny into their own hands, and worked for something resembling freedom, they immediately relapse into a tyranny that was in many ways worse than the one they just overthrew. Russia is a unique nation as it is not bound together by things like language or religion or ideology, but instead by apathy, brutality, and trauma. One poster a while back complained about an abundance of TLs that give Russian civilization the old cleansing treatment- this is why. Russia's "special" nature makes it a lot easier for this kind of deleterious barbarity and lunacy to take hold and prosper.
This is all a long way of saying that all this discussion about the west's potential reflection on itself in the wake of the tragedy in Russia is mostly wasted air. If any major cultural trends of denying western complicity in the 2RCW and its consequences exists in the future, it will be because it is true. Saying that the entire fault for the war lays at the feet of its primary victims- the Russian people- is at best only a very, very slight exaggeration, and frankly that's one of the most tragic aspects of the whole debacle in general.