Tne way I see it, the west got off quite lightly: no major cities hit, mostly the nukes destroyed a brunch of military bases and HQs: given the preemptive evacuation measures civilian casualties should be reduced, especially if it was not the actual cities that were hit, but nearly military facilities, and depending on the yield of the blasts.
Concerning military losses, I expect that with nuclear warfare looming on the horizon, most military hardware should have been manned and removed from fixed installations; EW should have allowed most planes to get in the air before the nuclear strikes hit their bases (which btw make for quite obvious targets) as well.
I expect most higher echelon commanders to have moved to mobile command posts as well (places like Mons and Naples make for EXTREMELY obvious targets, and it would be borderline idiotic to stick inside there)
Truth is that counter-force nuclear strikes only work if they enjoy the element of surprise.
Concerning civilian losses, I assume the worst should have happened in Dover and Calais
Concerning military losses, I expect that with nuclear warfare looming on the horizon, most military hardware should have been manned and removed from fixed installations; EW should have allowed most planes to get in the air before the nuclear strikes hit their bases (which btw make for quite obvious targets) as well.
I expect most higher echelon commanders to have moved to mobile command posts as well (places like Mons and Naples make for EXTREMELY obvious targets, and it would be borderline idiotic to stick inside there)
Truth is that counter-force nuclear strikes only work if they enjoy the element of surprise.
Concerning civilian losses, I assume the worst should have happened in Dover and Calais