Kongo was in the central Pacific; second of class Hiei was only commissioned on 4 August, so would probably be working up.What about the thought of the even worse IJN Kongō class........
Kongo was in the central Pacific; second of class Hiei was only commissioned on 4 August, so would probably be working up.What about the thought of the even worse IJN Kongō class........
Be afraid. Be very,very afraid.
I’m sorry! Please call off the emu hit team!
He was actually ordered back to Germany, after Cor. however he did not feel it was possible to make it back. Their was another German ship (cant remember the name) that actually skirted Antarctica and then went north around into the south Atlantic. It ended up at a USA port.
Anyway i have always wondered if it would have been better to break the fleet into separate pieces. Cause as much havoc in British shipping as possible then when coal ammo was running low head to neutral ports. I think any impact that could have been achieved as a fleet was achieved. However as separate ships you might have had more impact. Agreed the AC were really not constructed for this role.
According to the Wikipedia article the French destroyed the coals supplies at Tahiti when the German arrived (regardless, I agree the Germans seem to have coalers and plenty of coal supply when they approached the Falklands). The article notes the supplies of ammo shot up in the bombardment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombardment_of_Papeete
I still wonder if keeping the two AC at Rabaul would have been better. (Yes the Australia is around, but its only 1 BC), It will be hard to get at the German ships in the inner harbor, land some guns + men to help the defense. (The Nuremberg could detach for raiding independently). (The Leipzig is on the west coast of America and could raid independently)
http://www.navy.gov.au/history/feature-histories/capture-rabaul-and-sydneyemden-engagement-1914
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_occupation_of_German_New_Guinea
Ibuki was a more likely antagonist, being engaged in the chasse for Spee OTLKongo was in the central Pacific; second of class Hiei was only commissioned on 4 August, so would probably be working up.
What terrified Von Spee more than anything else was HMS Australia, which had been assigned to chase him and completely outclassed his armored cruisers. He was not staying in the Pacific with that ship in play.
And there is the rub. A raider needs coal and victims. That makes it a lot harder to hide than in the days of sail.
Trying for the Indian Ocean, or scattering as raiders are the first two that cross my mind. Relatively speaking the fleet had success. So perhaps it had no better outcomes?
Trying for the Indian Ocean, or scattering as raiders are the first two that cross my mind. Relatively speaking the fleet had success. So perhaps it had no better outcomes?
It was one of the best trained units in the German navy and I disagree other than sinking Craddocks obsolete ships - it did bugger all to disrupt Entente shipping or further Germany's cause in the grand scheme of things before dying
I would have scattered the fleet and done as much damage as possible before the inevitable
Not as much as you might think. The Is were obsolete and little better than a floating death trap against modern battlecruisers or battleships. So having them miss Dogger Bank is honestly, at worst nuetral for the RN. Maybe even a net gain. And Australia is not much better. She's still a first generation battlecruiser. So really no lose there.One could wonder if the German Pacific fleet was instrumental in preventing the battle of Dogger Bank from being a disaster for the Germans.
One could say it was a decent British victory but if Battle cruiser squadrons was reinforced by an extra battle cruiser perhaps it would have been a rout.
HMS Australia was delayed in the Pacific by a need to cover operations against potential actions of the East Asian Squadron. Invincible was in dry Dock after the Falklands. HMS Indefatigable was in the Mediterranean awaiting HMS Inflexible relieving her, inflexible was delayed by minor participating in the Falklands.
So that's 4 battle cruisers schedules disrupted by the East Asia squadron. Perhaps if they were outnumbered 5:3 in battle cruisers the Germans would have quickly retreated (saving the ac blucher) or perhaps the Germans would have lost a battle cruiser due to the increased British fire.
Just to clarify I'm just musing on the amount of distraction caused by the East Asia squadron at this stage of the war. I'm not saying things would have gone one way or the other if things were different.
When Emden attacked Pedang and sank the light cruiser Zemchug, he lacked the combat power for a major assault on the shipping choking the harbor. But Spee's whole squadron? Maybe a different story.
South America was the obvious play - sympathetic governments, interned ships that can provide crews or even their ships if they can get out. And the road to home lies up the East coast.
Von Spee had no reason to believe the British had sent battlecruisers to the Falklands. That would have seemed strategically very odd. And in a sense he managed to contrive to attack while they were still there
He could probably have taken on the other ships there and hoped to win, and if any ship was damaged hope to run her aground and get her crew off
Rather curiously, I am working on something right now with this very premise.
Can you DM me when it is available to read, I'd be very interested, thanks
I disagree OTL OOB,Not asure much as you might think. The Is were obsolete and little better than a floating death trap against modern battlecruisers or battleships. So having them miss Dogger Bank is honestly, at worst nuetral for the RN. Maybe even a net gain. And Australia is not much better. She's still a first generation battlecruiser. So really no lose there.
I disagree OTL OOB,
HMS Lion, Tiger, Princess Royal, New Zealand and Indomitable
v SMS Seydlitz, Moltke, Derfflinger and Blucher
Adding more Is will not hurt IMO, unless something goes very wrong the three real German BC have to match off L,T&PR so any more RN ships are just going to fight Blucher or be free to second one of the Germans without reply. Realistically I doubt much would actually change the OTL lack of clear division of targets will be unchanged but the slower ships will anyway not be in place to take a full part but maybe the stronger RN ships will not fixate on Blucher as its obvious that the many Is will do that job anyway, but we are talking Beatty's clear standing orders and flag signals so any F*** up imaginable is realistic?
Von Spee had no reason to believe the British had sent battlecruisers to the Falklands.
But then the whole world knows where the wolves are and the hunters will close in - as it was Emden was run to ground 10 days later!
I am not sure why Emden did not attack the shipping in the harbour even to a limited extent? I cannot seem to find an explanation.