aktarian, the Egyptians started the war with a blockade, an internationally recognized act of war.
What land did they seek to gain? I seem to recall Egypt getting it all back for a peace treaty. Just as they gave back the entire Sinai in 1956 thinking Nassar was dealing in good faith.
No, murdering innocents, seeking to destroy an entire nation, these are acts of terrorism. Responding when your people are being shelled is morally legitimate. Ah, the Arab whine, this is a very dangerous beast, when attacked it defends itself.
The Israelis have said no such thing, and have made clear that the blockade alone was a threat as well as an unprovoked act of war.
There is no need for further denial for Le Monde lied. The number of Egyptian soldiers, the units involved, and the tanks and other firepower are a matter of public record. The Israelis have made abundantly clear what forces they faced, as they should have since they captured most of the equipment(or at least the burnt out hulks). The number of tanks alone would have confirmed far more than two divisions.
There were no UN troops on Israel's side of the border, nor did the UN ever propose putting any there. EGYPT had blockaded Israel previously, Israel had never tried to blockade Egypt.
Likewise, there were no Israeli incursions into the Syria DMZ and no Palestinian villages in Syrian territory to begin with.
Levon? Are you referring to a political scandal in Israel in the 1950s known as the Lavon Affair as an act of war?
If you count Israeli reprisals as acts of war, then the fact that they were responding to raids proves the Arabs were the aggressors. And once again, if the Arabs, Palestinian or otherwise, let their community be used as a base to attack Israelis then too bad when the LEGITIMATE MILITARY TARGET gets hit in reprisal.