Hughes in 1916: Alternate American Presidents

Hughes, Charles Evans (1862 – 1948).

1906 – 1910 Governor of New York
1910 – 1916 Associate Justice of the Supreme Court
1916 – 1920 President of the United States

Elected by a slim margin in 1916, defeating the incumbent President (Thomas) Woodrow Wilson, President Charles Evans Hughes presided over a nation torn between its isolationist past and internationalist future. The last minute endorsement from Governor Hiram Johnson of California provided the Republican nominee, Charles Evans Hughes, with the 3,800 votes needed to swing the entire election. Charles Evans Hughes became the 29th President of the United States, winning just 46.2% of the popular vote.

During the “lame duck” period of the winter of 1916-1917, the United States continued to slide towards intervention in the Great War raging throughout Europe. In December of 1916, outgoing-President Wilson made a last ditch effort towards bringing peace to Europe, asking each side to announce their terms. On January 22, 1917, in an address to the Senate, Wilson appealed for a “peace without victory.” However, since he believed that Germany had wrongfully invaded neutral Belgium and unjustly used submarines, his dream of an “equality of nations upon which peace must be founded if it is to last” excluded Germany.

On January 31, 1917, Germany announced that its submarines would freely attack shipping opposed to its interests; no American ship would be safe. Germany gambled that a full-scale assault on the western front combined with unrestricted submarine warfare would defeat the Allies before the United States could build a war machine to support them. Wilson severed relations with Germany but expressed the hope that U.S. ships would not be attacked. He also asked Congress to approve a bill to arm American merchant vessels. Alarmed senators, speaking for those who thought the war was not a U.S. affair and fearful of any step that might start war with Germany, fought to stop the bill.

On March 4, 1917, Charles Evans Hughes was inaugurated to find himself at the helm of a ship irreversibly headed for war. Hughes and a vast segment of the American people, however, still hoped to stay out of the war. Their hopes vanished when the British presented Wilson with the Zimmermann note, a secret message, which British agents had intercepted and decoded, that advised the German minister to Mexico to seek a German-Mexican alliance against the United States. The publication of this note infuriated the American public and convinced them that war with Germany was necessary. On April 2, 1917, only a month into his term, President Hughes asked Congress for a declaration of war against the German Empire.

Hughes spent the summer of 1917 rallying the entire nation to war, attempting to gain the support of the populace. It was, however, slow going with a large section of the American public. On the other hand, industrial and military mobilization toward war production went rapidly, guided by such executives as Bernard Baruch and Herbert Hoover. Hughes gave them authority to act, supported them against their critics, and recognized their achievements. The first American troops reach the tired Allied lines in June of 1917.

In October of 1917, a Communist Party uprising and a new regime headed by Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky began the Russian Revolution. The new regime was opposed to all warring nations and was eager to undermine them. Hughes was shocked and dismayed by the Revolution and did as much as possible, short of sending troops, to support the foundering Tsar. Hughes was disillusioned to learn that the Allies had been plotting the dissolution of the German Empire. Relatively new to international politics, he was unaware of the extent that Allied leaders were primarily concerned with national self-interest.

In June of 1918, the Vice President of the United States, Charles Fairbanks, died of a heart attack at the age of 66. The Secretary of State, George Harvey, a former supporter of President Wilson who had jumped ships with the election of 1916, succeeded Fairbanks as the Vice President of the United States. Harvey was replaced as Secretary of State by Nicholas Butler.

In July, American-supplied, White Russian forces approach Yekaterinburg in the Ural Mountains. Due to quick movements and the overwhelming firepower supplied by the American weapons, the White Russians arrive in time to save Alexis Romanov, the heir to the throne of the Russian Empire. The fourteen year old is found living, among the bodies of his slain family. One sister, Anastasia Nicholaevna, is never found and is presumed to be dead.

Through the course of 1918, American troops helped to hold the Allied lines against the attacking Germans. Finally, in September of 1918, the new German chancellor, Prince Max of Baden, decided that Hughes’ Eleven Intentions gave his government a way to surrender without admitting defeat. On October 10, an armistice was signed by Wilson and his discontented Allies, who would have preferred total military victory. In November, Hughes finally received the gift he had been waiting for, when the American public replaced the Democratic Congress of Wilson’s Presidency with a new, Republican Congress.

Meanwhile, Secretary of State Butler, accompanied by Vice President Harvey, sailed for Europe to attend the peace conferences. The two Americans, however, were not successful in lessening the extremely harsh reparations and punishments placed upon the new German Republic. When they return to the United States in 1919, they are greeted by the American public as relative failures.

In order to distract the public from his negotiating failures, President Hughes boldly stood against the both the Treaty of Versailles and admission into the new League of Nations. Congress sided with the President and the Americans neither sign the Treaty of Versailles nor enter the League of Nations. Also, President Hughes boosts the aid sent to the White Russian forces.

With actual American troops (albeit in rather small numbers) and American munitions flowing into the White Russian ports of Arkhangelsk and Murmansk, the Whites manage to drive the Reds south of a line running from Lake Peipus, to Lake Ilmen, to Lake Rybinskoye, and then east along the Sukhona River. At this point, the two forces come to a stalemate. The White Region to the north will become the Russian Empire, headed by Tsar Alexis.

Come November of 1920, Charles Evans Hughes was up for reelection. His opponents, Democrats “Colonel” Edward House and Franklin D. Roosevelt, announced that the nation needed “not nostrums but normalcy.” The slogan “return to normalcy” expressed the yearning of some Americans for the unrestrained free enterprise, the untaxed incomes, and the high import tariffs of the past. It also meant a nation isolated from troublesome world affairs or, as House put it, “not submergence in internationality but sustainment in triumphant nationality.” Hughes and Harvey were defeated and “Colonel” Edward House became the 30th President of the United States.

COMING NEXT: President Edward Mandell House​
 

Grey Wolf

Donor
I am thinking that if German policy remains with Bethman-Hollwegg he may well act differently than OTL

For a start he may wait for Hughes to be inaugurated and repeat or rephrase the peace terms of late 1916

And then even if not, could unrestricted submarine warfare be delayed or be made exclusive of US ships as a fillip to see if Hughes will bite

I dont think you can change one thing without looking for a change in the reckoning of the other side

Grey Wolf
 
Philip Dru President

Walter--I suspect (hope I'm wrong) that you're being disingenuous with this TL. Hughes is a secondary concern here. I'm not sure the war ends 11/11 in this case. Hughes would probably not issue a Grandiose Fourteen Points for the Germans to latch onto as an Acceptable Peace.

But what you really what to talk about is Philip Dru Administrator and what a vile creature Col House (never served a day in the military BTW) was and how he wanted a Socialist America.

Went with a friend about two years ago to see a really funny Jewish comic named Henry Kissinger. Had me in stitches. At the end of the speech there was a QA period. Some of them were hostile and some were obsequious but Kissinger seemed to handle them well. But when my friend asked him to comment about what Philip Drew Administrator told us about House and his polciies, Kissinger who admiited to knowing a great deal about House said he knew nothing about a book of that name.

So tell us what's in the book.

Tom
 

Grey Wolf

Donor
Walter_Kaufmann said:
In October of 1917, a Communist Party uprising and a new regime headed by Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky began the Russian Revolution. The new regime was opposed to all warring nations and was eager to undermine them. Hughes was shocked and dismayed by the Revolution and did as much as possible, short of sending troops, to support the foundering Tsar

Um this is wrong - the Tsar was overthrown by the February revolution which brought the liberal democratic element headed by Kerensky to power after Michael was coerced into refusing the crown until it was offered to him by the people

The October revolution overthrew this attempted democratic Russia

Grey Wolf
 
Tom_B said:
So tell us what's in the book.

I believe that book is about a "patriot" who leads a military coup against the government of the United States in order to recreate the nation along the lines of Marxist ideals. In it, from what I've heard, House anonymously proposes the ideas later followed by Woodrow Wilson and, some say, Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal. I believe the idea of the "League of Nations" (even referred to by that term) is in the book, which was published before the 1st World War. House attempts to portray the perceived socialist legislation of the 1900's as nothing but a scam perpetrated by Big Business to consolidate power. I believe it outlined what later became the Council of Foreign Relations. It's a conspiratal blueprint, somewhat along the lines of the "Turner Diaries".

Am I correct?

Nevertheless, whether House was a dirtbag or not (he was), he wielded a LOT of power within the Democratic Party, usually staying in background, however. I know about "Col." House and am attempting to make this a radically different TL. If it suits you better, though, I can remove House and put Cox in instead. That'll make it more mainstream but not as interesting, in my opinion. I know that the US is, in all likelihood, not going to be a great place in the 1920s. But House is only going to serve one term.
 
Degrees of Dirtbag

I certainly do not like House but in my old age I've come to the conclusion that there are different degrees of Dirt in history's dirtbags and I am thinking my level is not as severe as yours. He was undoubtably a worse Anglophile than Wilson. He wanted the US in the Great War immediately after Lusitania but did not get his way so his power is not what some pretend. Wilson and House eventually had a falling out.

I haven't read Philip Dru Adminsitrator. You can easily purchase it on the web. People who like to make a big deal about it are usually into Conspiracy Theory. It get's linked to the Council on Foreign Raltions (a House creation), the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergers and pretty soon the illuminati show up in black helicopters. Oops I forgot New World Order.

My friend Steve is into a convoluted Left Wing version of it. Steve thought Kissinger was lying when he said he knew nothing about the book. Do you?

House was the quintessential power behind the throne type. He lacked the charisma to take power directly. Cox would seem a much more conventional choice but Alt Histories don't like to deal with him. Cox was a major player in his day but nowadays he's become very obscure unless one goes to Ohio and finds something named after him. So I don't recall seeing a TL with him as President. I've seen way too many where FDR's trajectory gets accelerated.

Actually one person who might make an interesting Alt Hist President to consider is Elihu Root.

One last point is Hearst's influence in this period gets understated in a lot of AH. It was largely his antipathy for Wilson that shifted WRH from a Bryan Democrat to supporting Republicans. So Hearst will be moving more slowly to the Right in this TL. He would endorse Cox (not House though).
 
Tom_B said:
My friend Steve is into a convoluted Left Wing version of it. Steve thought Kissinger was lying when he said he knew nothing about the book. Do you?

Not really. I've always liked Henry Kissinger and I'd like to think he wouldn't lie about something like that. But then again, he might.

Tom_B said:
House was the quintessential power behind the throne type. He lacked the charisma to take power directly. Cox would seem a much more conventional choice but Alt Histories don't like to deal with him. Cox was a major player in his day but nowadays he's become very obscure unless one goes to Ohio and finds something named after him. So I don't recall seeing a TL with him as President. I've seen way too many where FDR's trajectory gets accelerated.

Actually one person who might make an interesting Alt Hist President to consider is Elihu Root.

One last point is Hearst's influence in this period gets understated in a lot of AH. It was largely his antipathy for Wilson that shifted WRH from a Bryan Democrat to supporting Republicans. So Hearst will be moving more slowly to the Right in this TL. He would endorse Cox (not House though).

Okay. So lets say that Cox is elected. Scratch Edward House. My thinking was not to accelerate Roosevelt's career, but to end it. I've never really cared for FDR, to put it politely (oops, my prejudices showing through) and I was thinking that Cox could rule over the prosperous 20s. That would leave FDR to be elected in 1928, just before the Great Depression, which was (relatively) inevitable. Thus, FDR stands no chance of reelection in 32 against the Republican candidate. Maybe Hoover, maybe Bob Taft, maybe Root like you suggested, I'm not sure yet.
 
I have mixed opinions about FDR (net negative). I would be interested in your take on President Cox. If you can find a way to the 1920's less superficial that would be a bonus.
 
Top