Assassination attempt on Queen Victoria successful

What if the assassination attempt on Queen Victoria, in 1887, was successful?

How does Britain react let alone the rest of the world?

More to the point, how is history changed with such a POD?

Discuss.
 
What if the assassination attempt on Queen Victoria, in 1887, was successful?

How does Britain react let alone the rest of the world?

More to the point, how is history changed with such a POD?

Discuss.

There is a theory now that the 1887 "Jubilee Plot" was a set up by British Intelligence to discredit the Irish Nationalists.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jubilee_Plot

A better "Victoria gets assasinated" POD might be 10th June 1840 when Edward Oxford fired two shots at Victoria. He was tried for high treason the next month but was acquited on grounds of insanity.

None of Victoria and Albert's children has been born at the time of Oxford's attempt so if Victoria was to die without issue that could change a lot of things
 
1840 would be extremely interesting. It was Victoria who carried the dorment haemophilia gene was it not? If she doesn't survive to have children this could have big ramifications, especially in Russia.
 
1840 would be extremely interesting. It was Victoria who carried the dorment haemophilia gene was it not? If she doesn't survive to have children this could have big ramifications, especially in Russia.

That's right.

Tsarevich Alexei's mother Alexandra was born Princess Victoria of Hess and Rhine and was the daughter of Queen Victoria's 2nd daughter Alice.

If I remember right in the event of Queen Vicky dying without issue the British throne would have passed to her cousin, Prince George, the Duke of Cambridge
 
Last edited:
Victoria was (4 months) pregnant at the time of the June 1840 assination attempt with her first child Victoria. Her heir at that time was her uncle Ernest Augustus (King of Hanover and Duke of Cumberland &Teviotdale). He was an unpleasant and ruthless individual.
 
Victoria was (4 months) pregnant at the time of the June 1840 assination attempt with her first child Victoria. Her heir at that time was her uncle Ernest Augustus (King of Hanover and Duke of Cumberland &Teviotdale). He was an unpleasant and ruthless individual.

Does that mean there is a chance of union between the UK and Hanover if he becomes King?
 
Does that mean there is a chance of union between the UK and Hanover if he becomes King?

Well presumably they would be in personal union just as they were from George I to William IV. Victoria couldn't inherit the throne of Hanover because Hanover used Salic law so it passed to William's closest male relative, Ernest Augustus.

Personal Union, however, means that the two countries are separate sovereign states which simply share the same monarch (just like the UK does with Canada, Australia &c. today). I'm not sure if actually incorporating Hanover into the UK would be possible.
 
Well presumably they would be in personal union just as they were from George I to William IV. Victoria couldn't inherit the throne of Hanover because Hanover used Salic law so it passed to William's closest male relative, Ernest Augustus.

Personal Union, however, means that the two countries are separate sovereign states which simply share the same monarch (just like the UK does with Canada, Australia &c. today). I'm not sure if actually incorporating Hanover into the UK would be possible.

Nevertheless, a possession of the Crown in mainland Europe would hinder any "Splendid Isolation"-type policies, as any action threatening the Hanoverian domains would demand British intervention, lest Hanover rebel and find a better monarch, or even a republic.
 
Nevertheless, a possession of the Crown in mainland Europe would hinder any "Splendid Isolation"-type policies, as any action threatening the Hanoverian domains would demand British intervention, lest Hanover rebel and find a better monarch, or even a republic.
I Think The BIGGEST Butterfly will be The Fortunes of Prussia ...

With a Stake in TTL's Version of The Austro-Prussian War, Britain will Declare for Austria to Counter-Balance The Intervention of Italy ...

Even if this Doesn't Lead to a General European War Hot on The Heels of The American One, Prussia will NEVER be able to Unify Germany if it Can't Even Enlarge itself!

:eek:
 
What if the assassination attempt on Queen Victoria, in 1887, was successful?

How does Britain react let alone the rest of the world?

More to the point, how is history changed with such a POD?

That assassination attempt was to be explosives at Westminster. If it's like other historical examples, some of the bystanders will be killed as well, and in this case the bystanders include much of Victoria's family and of British nobility. How big a change occurs depends on who else dies.

If Edward VII survives, he would have had a lot more time to try to soothe the tensions in Europe. If he dies, his son Albert Victor becomes king until his death in 1892, after which George becomes king at 27 instead of 45, like in OTL. If Edward's wife dies, who will he remarry?

If Victoria's son-in-law Frederick of Prussia dies, his son Wilhelm gets the thone a year earlier. If Wilhelm dies in the explosion, his younger brother Heinrich was a lot more level-headed and pleasant, but also a fan of naval expansion.

If Salisbury is killed, who becomes Prime Minister?

1842 might be an interesting divergence point, too. It leaves Prince Albert as an unpopular regent, with only Princess Victoria and the infant Edward VII having been born. England is no longer tied to as many royal houses as OTL, and Queen Victoria has not passed on the gene for hemophilia.
 
Victoria was (4 months) pregnant at the time of the June 1840 assination attempt with her first child Victoria. Her heir at that time was her uncle Ernest Augustus (King of Hanover and Duke of Cumberland &Teviotdale). He was an unpleasant and ruthless individual.

Would you mind elaborating on this? Why do you characterize him as unpleasant and ruthless?
 
Would you mind elaborating on this? Why do you characterize him as unpleasant and ruthless?

From wikipedia:

The Duke of Cumberland had a reputation as one of the least pleasant of the sons of George III. Politically an extreme Tory, he opposed the 1828 Catholic Emancipation Bill proposed by the government of the Prime Minister, the Duke of Wellington. He was a founder member of the Orange Order - one of the first Orange Lodges formed bears his signature on their warrant. He also opposed the 1832 Reform Bill.

Rumour strongly suggested that he had murdered his valet, although the accepted version, as found by a coroner's verdict, is that the valet had attempted to assassinate him and then had cut his own throat. Other horrific stories told about the Duke included rumors of incestuous relations with Princess Sophia, his sister. He is also alleged to have made an indecent assault on Sarah, Lady Lyndhurst, the wife of Lord Lyndhurst, three-times Lord Chancellor. Many of these tales are attributed by historians to Whig politicians (the Duke was a Tory) attempting, with some success, to discredit him.

A recent biography, "Wicked Ernest", suggests that Cumberland did indeed murder his valet and had a son by his sister. Other historians have not yet taken this position.

I'm not sure about the veracity of the rather gossip-esque rumours regarding his personal life, but his politics were certainly reactionary.
 

Susano

Banned
Personal Union, however, means that the two countries are separate sovereign states which simply share the same monarch (just like the UK does with Canada, Australia &c. today). I'm not sure if actually incorporating Hanover into the UK would be possible.

As it was before Victoria IOTL, too. Even further apart than Canada and the UK, because Canada started out as not being independant, whereas Hannover has always been independant (well, as long as all German territorial states). But try to explain THAT to SOME Britwankers here:rolleyes:;)
 
Top