Alternate Wikipedia Infoboxes II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quebec 1962: Lesage's radical liberalization quickly becomes very popular in urban areas, mostly popular in suburban areas while rural Quebec remains loyal to the GOP. Former DNR Commissioner Daniel Johnson has assumed leadership of a rudderless GOP, but faced against a popular Democratic incumbent and a divided party his cause is hopeless. The second televised gubernatorial debate (Barrette had refused in 1960) is held, which is widely seen as a huge Lesage victory. Earlier that year Lesage had attempted legislation to nationalize the private electricity sector. Filibustered by Republican legislators and lacking the supermajority required for cloture, both parties agreed to schedule a concurrent ballot proposition titled Question 2. It passed 63/37, and by year's end enabling legislation would be enacted. As a result, Democrats gained an Assembly supermajority. Johnson faced 4 years of arduous rebuilding and many pundits believed the state would be solidly Democratic for the foreseeable future. However Johnson and the most astute GOP strategists, such as Young Republican chairman Brian Mulroney, believed otherwise.

attachment.php



1966: Johnson had finally imposed a lasting peace between GOP factions and updated the party platform to reflect what all realized were the new realities in 1965. As the GOP leader predicted, Lesage's boldly progressive legislation sparked an intense rural and to a lesser extent, suburban backlash which was missed by many national and state pundits. In the administration, only DNR Commissioner Rene Levesque, an antiestablishment progressive and native Gaspésien, sensed potentially serious political problems. Yet even he felt Lesage was moving too slowly rather than too fast, a viewed widely shared by administration progressives. Like the national party Democrats were almost openly warring between progressives and establishment wings, which caused Lesage considerable grief later in his term. In the meantime advocates of Quebec independence had formed the National Independence Rally (NIR/RIN). Johnson quickly made a secret deal with their leader, journalist Pierre Bourgault, to cooperate in exchange for mutual policy goals. They debated allowing NIR candidates to run as fusion candidates, but instead decided to remain separate to avoid scaring each other's base. This would prove an important element in the general election. An imperious Lesage, oblivious to the offence taken by swing voters at his arrogance, buoyantly accepted renomination in June. Lapalme decided to retire after 20 years in politics, and Lesage replaced him with Education Commissioner Paul Gerin-Lajoie. This was done to reconcile progressives and lay a marker for future education reforms in a third Lesage term. The general election was as ideologically polarizing as 1962, but Johnson also reassured independents that he would govern as a moderate conservative while extending some of Lesage's reforms. Combined with superior GOP organization and candidates, this was enough for Johnson to narrowly wrest the governorship from Lesage. The incumbent was both despondent and angry at his loss, promising he would be back and blaming the media for his loss. Now it was Democrats cast into opposition with bitter recriminations among publicly warring factions. Democratic leadership would pass to Assembly Minority Leader Gerard D. Levesque.
The Assembly was 58/50 Republican and the Senate 15/9 Republican.

attachment.php
 
Here's a PoD for the expanded US:

No Quebec Act. The Quebecers are not amused, to put it mildly, and when the Americans rebel, they join them...
 
1970: Gov. Johnson, despite continuing health issues, became popular fairly quickly and won grudging respect from his adversaries for enacting his agenda without excessive controversy. After inheriting a nearly bankrupt government, Treasurer Paul Dozois and the GOP Legislature had managed to stabilize the economy through severe spending cuts and fiscal reforms. By 1969 they had projected a small surplus, enabling them to reduce the prohibitive personal tax burden which had been a Democratic anvil in 1966. The looming issue was language, with voters in an increasingly nationalistic mood demanding Francization of both public and private squares. Johnson had begun grappling with this question in late 1968, urging his administration to preserve minority rights for the Anglophones whom the GOP had a historically good relationship. His proposals got bogged down in legislative committees, with intense negotiations set to resume in the new year. Johnson was ill that Christmas, managing to rally for his State of the State address Jan. 8. It would be one of his final public appearances. Two weeks later he died of a massive heart attack in his sleep, elevating Bertrand to the governorship. With Johnson having barely completed half his term, Bertrand would serve the remainder. The Lieutenant-Governor, well-intentioned if entirely mediocre in intellect and talent, was like Barrette ill-equipped to control the Organization. Unlike Barrette, the party remained more loyal than not. He managed to enact SB63, which guaranteed freedom of linguistic choice in K-12 schools. This split the GOP along nationalist/federalist lines, which combined with Bertrand's attempt to unilaterally impose federalist moderation as the party's platform enraging nationalists and right-wing conservatives. Many joined Rene Levesque in his quest for independence with his newly formed PNQ, which had split from the Democrats in 1968. Education Commissioner Jean-Guy Cardinal challenged Bertrand in the primary, with Bertrand winning 59/41. The fact that over 40% of Republicans wanted to replace their sitting governor was an ominous sign for November, though polls did not capture this at the time. Democrats had nominated sophomore Assemblyman Robert Bourassa, their financial expert, for Governor and Gerard D. Levesque as his running mate. Levesque had picked lawyer Jacques-Yvan Morin as his ticketmate in August. By late September polls showed a double-digit Bourassa lead with Bertrand and Levesque well behind. GOP-leaning independents switched to Bourassa in hopes of preventing a sudden surge for Levesque. In November Robert Bourassa would win 45%, enough to trigger a runoff election under the Constitution. This provision had not been used since the 19th century, and Levesque, knowing the result would not change, declined to contest. Bourassa was now Quebec's youngest Governor at 37. Levesque's private motive was to deny Bourassa a chance to rally a majority coalition, and help squeeze him in the subsequent election. Having received less than 20%, the GOP lost their major party status. Rather ironically the higher threshold had been enacted by Republicans: Duplessis and Sauvé in 1937 had wanted to deny ND rebels potential ballot access. Democrats swept to supermajorities in both houses and controlled all constitutional offices. Due to FPTP quirks, Republicans retained minority status in the Legislature.

attachment.php
 
Ontario 2014 Gubernatorial Election (sorry for don't put running mates)

I think we can just say these states don't have Lieutenant Governors. Quite a lot of US states went long periods without them before eventually creating that position. Even right now 5 states plus some territories don't have an official LT. Gov position.

Alberta 1967 and 1971.

I would have just kept the party name as Social Credit, not to get it mixed up with the earlier Populists (unless that's what you were going for). State third parties can flourish an last for some time.

I personally think Layton would probably belong to some social democratic party (maybe an Ontario wing of a hypothetical, relatively small NDP, as Nofix talked about a bit in the original infobox), instead of the Democrats.

Right now I'm imagining that the OTL areas where the Progressives, the Farmer-Laborers, the Nonpartisan League all flourished had one big Federal equivalent (Name Undecided) while keeping their state parties unique and oriented in the states interest. Cooperative started to creak in the 90's and merged with the weak state Democrats, as the New Democrats, and when they failed altogether they accepted a federal bailout and assistance by the Federal Democrats in exchange for disbanding and joining them wholesale.
 
Last edited:
I've concocted a list of Saskatchewan Governors and their time in office. My only concern is what is the national stage looking like? I need to know if I should have President Laurier (Democatic?) appoint Haultain (an OTL Conservative and here a Republican).

T.) Frederick Haultain (1897-1905) [Republican] (Territorial Governor under President Laurier)
1.) Thomas W. Scott (1905-1917) [Democratic]
2.) William Melville Martin (1917-1921) [Democratic]
3.) Charles Avery Dunning (1921-1925) [Democratic]
4.) James G. Gadiner (1925-1929) [Democratic]
5.) James T. M. Anderson (1929-1933) [Republican]
6.) William John Patterson (1933-1945 [Democratic]
7.) Tommy Douglas (1945-1961) [Cooperative] (First Governor from Cooperative Party, first and so far only 4 term Governor)
8.) Woodrow Lloyd (1961-1964) [Cooperative] (Constitutional change to elections in years before Presidential elections, as a ploy to weaken Cooperative turnout)
9.) W. Ross Matcher (1964-1972) [Saskatchewan] (de facto Republican affiliate)
10.) Allan Blakeney (1972-1984) [Cooperative]
11.) Grant Devine (1984-1992) [Saskatchewan]
12.) Roy Romanow (1992-2000) [New Democratic]
13.) Lorne Calvert (2000-2008) [New Democratic/Independent] (New Democratic Party completely disintegrated, Democrats reemerged as major left wing party)
14.) Brad Wall (2008-2016?) [Saskatchewan]
 
Right now I'm imagining that the OTL areas where the Progressives, the Farmer-Laborers, the Nonpartisan League all flourished had one big Federal equivalent (Name Undecided) while keeping their state parties unique and oriented in the states interest. Cooperative started to creak in the 90's and merged with the weak state Democrats, as the New Democrats, and when they failed altogether they accepted a federal bailout and assistance by the Federal Democrats in exchange for disbanding and joining them wholesale.

Yeah, I think nowadays there would be two major parties (the Democrats and the Republicans, of course), while there would be a smaller big-tent regionalist political alliance (probably composed of a Hawaiian nationalist political party, the Nacionalistas, the Puerto Rican Independence Party, the PNQ, a Texas and Louisanan regionalist groups, a Chiapas nationalist group, a Cuban nationalist party and the Partido Santo Domingo as I already indicated in the Leonel Fernandez infobox) with seats in the House and Senate, but never governing beyond the state level, called the National Alliance, again as I indicated in the Leonel Fernandez infobox.
 
Yeah, I think nowadays there would be two major parties (the Democrats and the Republicans, of course), while there would be a smaller big-tent regionalist political alliance (probably composed of a Hawaiian nationalist political party, the Nacionalistas, the Puerto Rican Independence Party, the PNQ, a Texas and Louisanan regionalist groups, a Chiapas nationalist group, a Cuban nationalist party and the Partido Santo Domingo as I already indicated in the Leonel Fernandez infobox) with seats in the House and Senate, but never governing beyond the state level, called the National Alliance, again as I indicated in the Leonel Fernandez infobox.

Hey, that's my idea! :p

And you forgot the Alaskan Independence guys.
 
The series where you had the agrarian Greens, Republicans and the regionalist alliance is what gave me the inspiration for the regionalist group.

Oh yeah, those guys too. The Alaskan Independence guys would definitely join.

Well, it also has states' rights, which may become a non-dogwhistle word in this world as well. Libertarianism too, but that's covered by the GOP in this one.
 
Well, it also has states' rights, which may become a non-dogwhistle word in this world as well. Libertarianism too, but that's covered by the GOP in this one.

I more imagine the NA as being very big-tent (ranging from socialists in Chiapas to ultra-conservatives in Texas and Alaska). The NA would probably support more autonomy, though probably most of the parties would be secessionist (PNQ, AIP, PRIP, Nacionalistas, etc.) rather than autonomists (probably exemplified by the Texas and Louisiana groups).
 
Not that I'm not loving these gubernatorial boxes, but should this become a formal Shared World? I mean, that's basically what it is

That is a good point...I'm busy with other projects (and very lazy to boot) so I'd only be able to take backseat contribution to it if it's launched.

I do know one thing, the first thing we need to do is figure out how we got all of North America, what the national politics were, and then work downward.
 
List of Presidents of United States of North America

01. 1789-1797: George Washington (Indep-Virginia)
02. 1797-1801: John Adams (Federalist-Massachusetts)
03. 1801-1809: Thomas Jefferson (Democratic/Republican-Virginia)
04. 1809-1817: Gordon Drummond (Democratic/Republican-Quebec)
05. 1817-1825: James Monroe (Democratic/Republican-Virginia)
06. 1825-1829: John Q. Adams (National/Republican-Massachusetts)
07. 1829-1837: Andrew Jackson (Democratic-Tennessee)
08. 1837-1841: William H. Harrison (Whig-Ohio)
09. 1841-1849: Martin van Buren (Democratic-New York)
10. 1849-1853: Lewis Cass (Democratic-Michigan)
11. 1853-1857: Louis-Hippolyte Lafontaine (Whig-Quebec)
12. 1857-1861: James Buchanan (Democratic-Pennsylvania)
13. 1861-1869: Abraham Lincoln (Republican-Illinois)
14. 1869-1877: Ulysses Grant (Republican-Illinois)
15. 1877-1881: John A. Macdonald (Democratic-Ontario)

16. 1881-1881: James Garfield (Republican-Ohio) [1]
17. 1881-1885: James G. Blaine (Republican-Maine)
18. 1885-1891: John A. Macdonald (Democratic-Ontario) [2]
19. 1891-1893: Grover Cleveland (Democratic-New York)
20. 1893-1901: Edward Blake (Republican-Ontario)
21. 1901-1901: William McKinley (Republican-Ohio)
22. 1901-1909: Theodore Roosevelt (Republican-New York)
23. 1909-1913: William H. Taft (Republican-Ohio)
24. 1913-1921: Wilfrid Laurier (Democratic-Nova Scotia)
25. 1921-1922: Warren Harding (Republican-Ohio) [1]
26. 1922-1927: Calvin Coolidge (Republican-Massachusetts) [1]
27. 1927-1929: Nicholas Longworth (Republican-Ohio)

28. 1929-1933: Herbert Hoover (Republican-California)
29. 1933-1946: Franklin Roosevelt (Democratic-New York) [2]
30. 1946-1949: W. L. M. King (Democratic-Ontario)
31. 1949-1953: Harry Truman (Democratic-Missouri)
32. 1953-1961: Dwight Eisenhower (Republican-New York)
33. 1961-1963: John F. Kennedy (Democratic-Massachusetts) [1]
34. 1963-1965: Juan Bosch (Democratic-Santo Domingo)
35. 1965-1969: Lyndon Johnson (Democratic-Texas)
36. 1969-1974: Richard Nixon (Republican-California)
37. 1974-1975: Gerald Ford (Republican-Michigan) [1]
38. 1975-1977: Erik Nielsen (Republican-Yukon)

39. 1977-1981: Pierre Trudeau (Democratic-Quebec)
40. 1981-1989: Ronald Reagan (Republican-California)
41. 1989-1993: Brian Mulroney (Republican-Quebec)
42. 1993-2001: Bill Clinton (Democratic-Arkansas)
43. 2001-2009: Joseph Estrada (Republican-Manila)
44. 2009-: Barack Obama (Democratic-Illinois)

[1] Assassinated
[2] Died in office
 
Last edited:
List of Presidents of United States of North America

01. 1789-1797: George Washington (Indep-Virginia)
02. 1797-1801: John Adams (Federalist-Massachusetts)
03. 1801-1809: Thomas Jefferson (Democratic/Republican-Virginia)
04. 1809-1817: Gordon Drummond (Democratic/Republican-Quebec)
05. 1817-1825: James Monroe (Democratic/Republican-Virginia)
06. 1825-1829: John Q. Adams (National/Republican-Massachusetts)
07. 1829-1837: Andrew Jackson (Democratic-Tennessee)
08. 1837-1841: William H. Harrison (Whig-Ohio)
09. 1841-1849: Martin van Buren (Democratic-New York)
10. 1849-1853: Lewis Cass (Democratic-Michigan)
11. 1853-1857: Louis-Hippolyte Lafontaine (Whig-Quebec)
12. 1857-1861: James Buchanan (Democratic-Pennsylvania)
13. 1861-1869: Abraham Lincoln (Republican-Illinois)
14. 1869-1877: Ulysses Grant (Republican-Illinois)
15. 1877-1881: John A. Macdonald (Democratic-Ontario)

16. 1881-1881: James Garfield (Republican-Ohio) [1]
17. 1881-1885: James G. Blaine (Republican-Maine)
18. 1885-1891: John A. Macdonald (Democratic-Ontario) [2]
19. 1891-1893: Grover Cleveland (Democratic-New York)
20. 1893-1901: Edward Blake (Republican-Ontario)
21. 1901-1901: William McKinley (Republican-Ohio)
22. 1901-1909: Theodore Roosevelt (Republican-New York)
23. 1909-1913: William H. Taft (Republican-Ohio)
24. 1913-1921: Wilfrid Laurier (Democratic-Nova Scotia)
25. 1921-1922: Warren Harding (Republican-Ohio) [1]
26. 1922-1927: Calvin Coolidge (Republican-Massachusetts) [1]
27. 1927-1929: Nicholas Longworth (Republican-Ohio)

28. 1929-1933: Herbert Hoover (Republican-California)
29. 1933-1946: Franklin Roosevelt (Democratic-New York) [2]
30. 1946-1949: W. L. M. King (Democratic-Ontario)
31. 1949-1953: Harry Truman (Democratic-Missouri)
32. 1953-1961: Dwight Eisenhower (Republican-New York)
33. 1961-1963: John F. Kennedy (Democratic-Massachusetts) [1]
34. 1963-1965: Alexander Bustamante (Democratic-Jamaica)
35. 1965-1969: Lyndon Johnson (Democratic-Texas)
36. 1969-1974: Richard Nixon (Republican-California)
37. 1974-1975: Gerald Ford (Republican-Michigan) [1]
38. 1975-1977: Erik Nielsen (Republican-Yukon)

39. 1977-1981: Pierre Trudeau (Democratic-Quebec)
40. 1981-1989: Ronald Reagan (Republican-California)
41. 1989-1993: Brian Mulroney (Republican-Quebec)
42. 1993-2001: Bill Clinton (Democratic-Arkansas)
43. 2001-2009: Joseph Estrada (Republican-Philippines)
44. 2009-: Barack Obama (Democratic-Illinois)

[1] Assassinated
[2] Died in office

Unfortunately due to the fact that I decided not to add Jamaica in my area calculations Jamaica is not part of the USA (not actually called the USNA. Just still the USA), so Bustamante wouldn't be VP, though I could see someone like Juan Bosch becoming President instead.

Also I highly doubt that no Presidents would be elected from any of the Mexican states (which would probably be U.S. states, though Mexico City would obviously be part of the State of Mexico) and that the Philippines, being as massive as it is, would just be one state (probably three or four, though they'd probably still have a common identity, similar to New England). That's just my opinion though.
 
Unfortunately due to the fact that I decided not to add Jamaica in my area calculations Jamaica is not part of the USA (not actually called the USNA. Just still the USA), so Bustamante wouldn't be VP, though I could see someone like Juan Bosch becoming President instead.

Also I highly doubt that no Presidents would be elected from any of the Mexican states (which would probably be U.S. states, though Mexico City would obviously be part of the State of Mexico) and that the Philippines, being as massive as it is, would just be one state (probably three or four, though they'd probably still have a common identity, similar to New England). That's just my opinion though.

Taking the choice of Jamaica, I tried to fit some historical figures in this "OTL" United States. The four Filipino states would be Luzon, Manila, Visayas and Mindanao?
 
List of Presidents of United States of North America

01. 1789-1797: George Washington (Indep-Virginia)
02. 1797-1801: John Adams (Federalist-Massachusetts)
03. 1801-1809: Thomas Jefferson (Democratic/Republican-Virginia)
04. 1809-1817: Gordon Drummond (Democratic/Republican-Quebec)
05. 1817-1825: James Monroe (Democratic/Republican-Virginia)
06. 1825-1829: John Q. Adams (National/Republican-Massachusetts)
07. 1829-1837: Andrew Jackson (Democratic-Tennessee)
08. 1837-1841: William H. Harrison (Whig-Ohio)
09. 1841-1849: Martin van Buren (Democratic-New York)
10. 1849-1853: Lewis Cass (Democratic-Michigan)
11. 1853-1857: Louis-Hippolyte Lafontaine (Whig-Quebec)
12. 1857-1861: James Buchanan (Democratic-Pennsylvania)
13. 1861-1869: Abraham Lincoln (Republican-Illinois)
14. 1869-1877: Ulysses Grant (Republican-Illinois)
15. 1877-1881: John A. Macdonald (Democratic-Ontario)

16. 1881-1881: James Garfield (Republican-Ohio) [1]
17. 1881-1885: James G. Blaine (Republican-Maine)
18. 1885-1891: John A. Macdonald (Democratic-Ontario) [2]
19. 1891-1893: Grover Cleveland (Democratic-New York)
20. 1893-1901: Edward Blake (Republican-Ontario)
21. 1901-1901: William McKinley (Republican-Ohio)
22. 1901-1909: Theodore Roosevelt (Republican-New York)
23. 1909-1913: William H. Taft (Republican-Ohio)
24. 1913-1921: Wilfrid Laurier (Democratic-Nova Scotia)
25. 1921-1922: Warren Harding (Republican-Ohio) [1]
26. 1922-1927: Calvin Coolidge (Republican-Massachusetts) [1]
27. 1927-1929: Nicholas Longworth (Republican-Ohio)

28. 1929-1933: Herbert Hoover (Republican-California)
29. 1933-1946: Franklin Roosevelt (Democratic-New York) [2]
30. 1946-1949: W. L. M. King (Democratic-Ontario)
31. 1949-1953: Harry Truman (Democratic-Missouri)
32. 1953-1961: Dwight Eisenhower (Republican-New York)
33. 1961-1963: John F. Kennedy (Democratic-Massachusetts) [1]
34. 1963-1965: Alexander Bustamante (Democratic-Jamaica)
35. 1965-1969: Lyndon Johnson (Democratic-Texas)
36. 1969-1974: Richard Nixon (Republican-California)
37. 1974-1975: Gerald Ford (Republican-Michigan) [1]
38. 1975-1977: Erik Nielsen (Republican-Yukon)

39. 1977-1981: Pierre Trudeau (Democratic-Quebec)
40. 1981-1989: Ronald Reagan (Republican-California)
41. 1989-1993: Brian Mulroney (Republican-Quebec)
42. 1993-2001: Bill Clinton (Democratic-Arkansas)
43. 2001-2009: Joseph Estrada (Republican-Philippines)
44. 2009-: Barack Obama (Democratic-Illinois)

[1] Assassinated
[2] Died in office

I would expect a significant other party in the early 20th century. We were talking of something to represent the various left parties. And Mexico had a Laborist Party too, sooo....

And this list is way too convergent.
 
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top