But much can the Deacon do for the revolution? Can it make that much of a difference?
Anyhow, enjoyed the update.
Excerpt from “the History of Rumelia”
by Professor Bozhidar Dimitrov
© Balkan Press Ltd., 1994
The Russians did put a provision about Russian troops staying in Bulgaria, but only for two years. Also, the San Stefano Treaty forbade the Tsar or any other member of a reigning dynasty of a Great Power from being elected as Prince. You can read the whole treaty hereI don't know about isolationism, the Deacon was against anyone helping Bulgaria in its revolutionary struggle, saying "Who ever "frees" us, will enslave us in return." and he was mostly right. As the Russians proved it, when signing the San Stefano treaty, they made sure to put provisions about Russian troops staying in Bulgaria and Bulgarians electing the Tsar as the ruler of the new country. That is partially the reason why Bulgaria was cut up in the Berlin Congress, because if the San Stefano treaty was accepted, then Bulgaria will become nothing more then a Gubernya behind the Danube, occupied by Russian troops poised to get to Constantinople to give legitimacy to the Third Rome rhetoric.
But the Deacon is smarter then that, he knows that a country cannot survive on itself in the world, that is why he allowed negotiations with the Serbians and that is why he has agreed to make Bucharest the headquarters of the Central Committee.
-stuff-
Would Bulgaria become a kingdom or a republic if 'Stambolov Squared' emerges as the key figure?
I am thinking over that same issue, you see Levski was a proponent of a "Free and Sacred" republic where everyone is equal and enjoys slimier rights. But it all depends on how the country itself is freed, if the Russians get involved and a San Stefano happens, then anything else then a Principality is out of the question, as far as I know.
I'm a Bulgarian, I don't think it's been translated in English. And regarding parents who may have given their children voluntary, it might have happened (though as I said there is a possibility of confusion of Muslims who wanted to use this as means of advancement), but I really doubt that it was a common occurrence. Also Bozhidar Dimitrov doesn't admit anything like this, though he does mention that Janissaries were taken from older children (you can check it here).Good note on Dimitrov, quite surprised someone else has read it. Have you read it in English or are you a fellow Bulgarian? And yes, taking it in hindsight maybe Dimitrov is not the best author to present this as a historical position, but you cannot argue that in the Early Empire, the Janissary Corps themselves along with many others were considered a way to progress in society and some Christian families where happy to give children up to the Corps. And if you read that book itself, you will notice that even Dimitrov, who is a staunch anti-ottoman, admired that this happened. Now it is true, that Christians wouldn't for the most part give up their children lightly, and I probably should have noted that, since it came off as more Pro-Ottoman that it actually is.
Certainly, though it should be noted that even the most prominent Russophobes like Stambolov and Zahari Stoyanov took a while to reach their views (basically until it became obvious that the Russian Tsar would not settle with anything but total control over Bulgaria). After all, Russian armies did liberate Bulgaria and the Russians were still helpfulltowards Bulgaria in the first few years, for example by training the army. Of course, if Bulgaria owes less to Russia, this disillusionment will happen much faster.And point taken on the second part, my source was the heavily Russophile Simeon Radev, so it might not come with all truths in it and may have included a few "Russia is a monster" notes, but what we can agree on is that Russian influence was generally not a good thing.
-stuff-
BgKnight I have question Could Bulgaria annex Serbia
По-скоро добър вечер and yes, I of course don't mind helping with the time line.А добър ден тогава. Agreed on those parts, you don't mind if I hit you up on a few questions while constructing the timeline, I have a few brewing right now, but I will ask you only if you agree to help. :3
Also, I must note, I called Simeon Radev a Russophile, but he I meant a Russophobe, but you understood me.
Though the Bulgarians would probably have liked to annex the Niš area, which after all had been usually considered Bulgarian until a few years before then and still speaks a dialect that can be considered both Bulgarian and Serbian.Doubt it mate. The only time this was possible, was the Serbo-Bulgarian war and like, even then Bulgarians had no intentions to actually annex Serbia, so even that is off the table.