Map Thread VI

Status
Not open for further replies.
My first attempt at a map that is in any way "fancy"- the Themata of the Eastern Roman Empire towards the end of the eighteenth century. Tips on how to improve these clumsy first tries would be much appreciated. I'm using PaintShop.

cut out Rhomanian governance of the 18th century 65.png
 
Here is my final version of MONGOLWANK, or rather Mongliwank.

In 1281 the combined Mongolian-Korean forces manage to gain a foothold on the Japanese islands during their second attempt at an invasion instead of being crushed by a typhoon like OTL (so there is no kamikaze). The Mongols not only continued their conquest from that point on, they also managed to keep most of their Asian possesions, minus those in China, India and inbetween. From the Japanese islands, they even reached the Americas, after it was discovered by the Europeans, and conquered large parts of Northern America.

The world now is very interesting in the Chinese sense:

In Europe, France became the dominant power with strong support from its allies, the Scots, Florence, Poland-Prussia and Venice. The Empire of Spania is also an important French ally, so is Muscowy.

Germany has been united in the early 17th century by a nationalist movement known as the Hannoversche Bewegung, which gained strong support from many minor nobles, as well as the liberal king of Brunswick, Friedrich III. of Wettin, who became the first emperor after the end of the Holy Roman Empire after the German Civil War. Now Germany is allied with various European nations, including a strong bond with Hungary, England and the Dutch. Austria, which caused the German Civil War, is considered to be neutral.

In the north, Scandinavian Socialists proclaimed the United Scandinavian Socialist Republics, or USSR for short, after decades of suppression of the poor farmers and workers from the decadent aristocracy. Now Socialism is gaining popularity, especially in the Middle East and *South America.

ITLs Americas, called Atlantis, were first discovered by a Moor captain named Alexander of Cordoba, who converted to Christianity and sailed for the Spaniards. From that moment on, the Spaniards and the English heavily colonised the continent, with the Dutch, French and Germans gaining relativly minor holdings. Most colonies here already declared independence. However it should be noted that the Aztecs and the Maya were defeated by the English and gained incredible autonomy afterwards, while the Incan Empire and Chimor were never conquered. The most powerful Atlantican nations today are the Republic of Colombia (in OTLs Argentina), the Federal Republic of Georgia, the Empire of Altántida and the formerly Dutch state of Riverienland. Kébec is a weird nation, while it is technically independent from France, it still sees the French king as their head of state.

Asia and Oceania are very different because of the Mongolian hegemony, with only Delhi, the Madras Union and China rivaling the Mongols. Indonesia and Oceania were heavily colonized and almost evenly split between France and Spania. However, Bruneian pirates and the Sultanate of Acre, as well as the Mongol-influenced Majapahit Empire, resisted the invaders. India is mostly free, with only the French and English controling more than simple trading ports.

In the Middle East, Socialism spread recently, but there are also classic Islamic monarchies like Persia, Germiyan, Syria and Oman. The most interesting country still is, by far, the Bedouin Federation, whose nomads essentially discovered Anarcho-Communism. Other Socialist states are Trebizond and Georgia. Also, there currently is a civil war going on in Iraq between the Kurds in the North, the Royals, the Socialist Party and the Shi'a Free State in the south.

Africa is almost entirely colonised, except Ethiopia, which is a French puppet.

Socially the world is on the brink of a world war between the German-led International League and the French-led Imperial Entente. Radio and the telephone have been discovered and are widely used, so is the cinema. Regarding the mental attitude, it is very similiar to OTLs 1920s.


Last but not least I would like to thank B_Munro for both his inspirational value and his suggestions towards the concept of this world, especially the Cossack state and Brunei.

etwas merkwuerdiges B_Munro-style.PNG
 
Last edited:
Thanks, Iserlohn!

(Bedouin Anarch-Socialists? The mind boggles. Presumably they're all about redistributing property among themselves - other people's property).

Here's a map I did for this thread:
https://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=157194&page=2

Which I thought I'd post here. Basically, the US never gets into WWI, a somewhat better prepared *Michael fails, and things drag on until it becomes a matter of "who collapses first". (Italy essentially does, and requires large number of British Empire troops to keep the country afloat). The Left is increasingly radicalized, and things finally collapse into revolution. France and the UK are too exhausted (and in the case of France, at the point of social revolution itself) to pursue the "liberation" of Germany beyond the Rhineland. Eventually, an armistice of sorts is worked out with the US working as a neutral in-between, which leaves nobody really happy.

Turkey implodes in 1919, and gets a more ruthless carve-up than OTL, which as of 1925 is looking a bit unwise. Mussolini is even more than OTL hailed as the man who saved Italy from Red Revolution, and with a bit more justification.

Meanwhile, in Russia, the Whites have managed to emerge on top, and a shaky new Russian Empire with a figurehead Czar, an uneasy balance of power between military and Duma, and continued unrest in Central Asia and among the urban poor struggles to consolidate itself.

(The Association of Nations is a League of Nations equivalent, and usually just as ineffective, although the Association control of the Danzig-Polish corridor area does have the benefit of pissing off both sides equally...)

Bruce

RedGermany.png
 
Procrastination!

My take on potential NCAA College Football conference realignment. Big 12 breaks up in 2010 when Texas, Texas A&M, and Texas Tech accept an invitation to the Pac-10 followed quickly by Colorado, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma State. The Pac-10 renames itself the Pacific West Conference and aligns itself into two eight-team divisions; east and west with flexible home and home conference scheduling so that each team cycles through the league every six years and is able to maintain historic rivalries every year (Texas/A&M, USC/UCLA, Washington/Washington St., etc.).

The sudden breakup of the Big 12 leads to Nebraska and Missouri accepting invitations to the Big 10 followed several days later by Kansas who receives a belated invite based on its basketball program and to create an even 14 team league that still bears the ironic name "Big 10".

The sudden break up of the league is a crushing blow to Iowa State, Kansas State, and Baylor who suddenly find themselves without a conference, despite the best efforts of school administrators and state legislatures. Every attempt was made in Austin to have Baylor tacked onto the Texas schools going to the Big 12 but that move failed while at the same time there were high hopes at Iowa State that they would be the 14th Big 10 school when it appears Kansas was bound for either the Big East or even the SEC which began making overtures in order to not be left behind. In the end KU went to the Big 10, while Kansas State and Iowa State went to the Mountain West who extended an invitation to Boise State that same year as was awarded the Big 12's old BCS berth. Baylor was the last school to align with a conference, flirting with independence before taking a spot with the WAC to fill Boise State's vacant position. The Big 12 became a lame duck conference with great tensions between the schools and some of the most heated football games in conference history in the years 2010 to 2015 (when the ESPN contract ended and the league could be dissolved without major penalty), including Baylor's historic 2011 campaign where they nearly took home the Big 12 title, defeating both Texas and Oklahoma in the same season for the first time in decades.

The breakup of the Big 12 led to much jockeying amongst the other conferences to outflank the moves made by the Pacific West, Mountain West, and Big 10. In 2011 the SEC extended invitations to Florida State and Georgia Tech after their famous 2010 flirtations with Kansas resulting in the announcement that Florida State would be joining the SEC in 2014. When Georgia Tech declined followed by a rejection from Louisville and Texas Christian the SEC, desperate to maintain divisional balance, began talks with schools it normally never consider; South Florida (rejected by Florida and Florida State), Miami (again rejected by the two Floridian SEC schools), SMU (which refused for competitive and administrative reasons), and Houston (rejected by Arkansas and LSU while mocked in the media) before coming to an agreement with Kansas State. While K-State was hardly "southeastern" they were competitive on the field, were a large public school, and frankly was the only school that fit the mold willing to make the jump. Thus Kansas State bailed from the Mountain West before even playing a game. The Mountain West responded by entering into talks with Houston, SMU, and Baylor but the invite went to Baylor at the urging of Baylor politicians who wished to see the Bears in a respectable conference again.

With the loss of Florida State the ACC began a year long search for a replacement school for the 2014 season culminating with the 2012 agreement that South Florida would join the ACC. In response the Big East extended an invitation to Memphis whose basketball program remained second to none and could also replace South Florida on the football schedule since only a select few Big East schools also play football. Once again Houston got the shaft in those talks but decided to join the WAC along with intercity rival Rice that year when Conference USA's potential TV deal with ESPN yielded less than spectacular results with the loss of Memphis basketball from the conference.

By 2015 the stage was set and the Big 12 completed its final season, 20 years after the start of that conference with the collapse of the Southwestern Conference and subsequent merger of select Texas schools with the Big 8. All in all 18 major schools would move conferences from 2010 to 2015 in the biggest college football shakeup since the SWC collapse and independent migrations of the early 90's.

Yet the landscape seems to always be on the verge of changing to this day. The Big 10 benefited greatly from the realignment, both on the gridiron and the hardwood, but even the addition of Nebraska, Missouri, and Kansas didn't seem to breath new life into a conference that remains bound to old traditions and simply unable to "keep pace" with the faster and more change driven Pacific West and SEC. The Pacific West benefited the greatest from the realignment, adding Texas and Oklahoma to a conference that already boasted USC but also Oregon, Oregon State, and California who continue to be factors and Washington who returned to prominence in 2012. In addition Oklahoma State continued its athletic momentum thorough the 2010's while Texas A&M's football program successfully reinvented itself under Mike Sherman then Art Briles who bolted Baylor in 2012, culminating in back to back Pacific West Championships in 2018 and 2019. The Mountain West should also be considered a winner in the reshuffle as Baylor, Boise State, and Iowa State brought the competitive edge TCU, Utah, and BYU needed to be taken seriously on the national scale. Boise State capped its great run in 2016 with a national championship appearance (it lost to Ohio State in a thriller while TCU won the Orange Bowl over USC.

Realignment was not all winners though. The Big East never recovered from the loss of South Florida from a football perspective and that league has been a de facto football monopoly between West Virginia and Pittsburgh (Cincinnati and Louisville are the only other schools to win conference titles). The SEC continues to be a dominant conference matched only by the Pacific West and the Big 10 (on a good year). However Florida State and Kansas State continue to be mocked by pundits as irrational, rapid, overreactions to the Pacific West and Big 10 expansions. With the exception of Kansas State's 2017 SEC Championship appearance season (losing to Florida in overtime before their coach took the job at Oklahoma) neither have been a factor in that league to the detriment of the SEC. The biggest loser though is the ACC which failed to lure, or even be seriously considered by a major program. The loss of Florida State still stings to this day. Though South Florida has been better on the field over that period of time, Florida State was the biggest ACC school in terms of enrollment and the sheer revenue its football program produced. On the Harcourt the league is sound but outside of the Big East the ACC is the biggest loser when it comes to the amount each member school brings in from TV, bowl, and other revenue deals.

I love the map, but there are some problems in it. The biggest is that Kansas and Kansas State are not allowed in be in different conferences. They would have to stay together and I don't think the Big Ten would want K-State. Also I think if the Big Ten is going to expand by more than one they are going to grab Rutgers. The whole goal is add new media markets because they get 51% of all Big Ten Network Revenue. Getting Rutgers means New York City which means 51% of all those cable subscribers.
 
Here's a map I did for this thread:
https://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=157194&page=2

Which I thought I'd post here. Basically, the US never gets into WWI, a somewhat better prepared *Michael fails, and things drag on until it becomes a matter of "who collapses first". (Italy essentially does, and requires large number of British Empire troops to keep the country afloat). The Left is increasingly radicalized, and things finally collapse into revolution. France and the UK are too exhausted (and in the case of France, at the point of social revolution itself) to pursue the "liberation" of Germany beyond the Rhineland. Eventually, an armistice of sorts is worked out with the US working as a neutral in-between, which leaves nobody really happy.

Turkey implodes in 1919, and gets a more ruthless carve-up than OTL, which as of 1925 is looking a bit unwise. Mussolini is even more than OTL hailed as the man who saved Italy from Red Revolution, and with a bit more justification.

Meanwhile, in Russia, the Whites have managed to emerge on top, and a shaky new Russian Empire with a figurehead Czar, an uneasy balance of power between military and Duma, and continued unrest in Central Asia and among the urban poor struggles to consolidate itself.

(The Association of Nations is a League of Nations equivalent, and usually just as ineffective, although the Association control of the Danzig-Polish corridor area does have the benefit of pissing off both sides equally...)

Bruce

Neat map! I like international control of the Danzig Corridor, and I feel sad for Turkey :( . I like the French-puppet Rhineland, as well. I wonder, though, why no French attempt at a Christian Lebanon like IRL?
 
I love the map, but there are some problems in it. The biggest is that Kansas and Kansas State are not allowed in be in different conferences. They would have to stay together and I don't think the Big Ten would want K-State. Also I think if the Big Ten is going to expand by more than one they are going to grab Rutgers. The whole goal is add new media markets because they get 51% of all Big Ten Network Revenue. Getting Rutgers means New York City which means 51% of all those cable subscribers.

I agree, though honestly they'll probably just grab Nebaska, leave Mizzou out in the cold and have an even 12 team conference with a championship game. Only two teams can call their shots on entering the Big 10; Notre Dame and Texas. Since Texas will never happen and Notre Dame won't do squat as long as they have their NBC deal and all those sweet independence perks...they'll be content with Nebraska for now.

The Kansas' were more to make the map interesting :D
 
Neat map! I like international control of the Danzig Corridor, and I feel sad for Turkey :( . I like the French-puppet Rhineland, as well. I wonder, though, why no French attempt at a Christian Lebanon like IRL?

No US participation in the war, no Wilson's 14 points: Syria is all under direct French control (the Association of Nations does not give out Mandates) and therefore no need to seperate Lebanon from a Syria less securely in their ownership.

Bruce
 
No US participation in the war, no Wilson's 14 points: Syria is all under direct French control (the Association of Nations does not give out Mandates) and therefore no need to seperate Lebanon from a Syria less securely in their ownership.

Bruce

Makes sense. Is "Northern Arabia" or whatever then a British puppet under Faisal, or is it a full on British colony? (I assume Palestine is some variety of colony).
 
Makes sense. Is "Northern Arabia" or whatever then a British puppet under Faisal, or is it a full on British colony? (I assume Palestine is some variety of colony).

Puppet monarchy and colony, respectively. (The Hejaz is also a puppet, but the British are currently wondering if propping it up is more trouble than it's worth.)

Bruce
 
From my current project;

The War Aims of the Axis.


* Colored nations represent the Axis nations and places where their was major Axis support*.
* Light grey nations are puppets.
* White-Grey nations are places that the Axis did'nt care about so long as they were'nt trying anything funny.
* The English channel was to become 'Axis waters', that is a zone controlled by the Axis where the British,
French and a few others were forbidden from having anything but civil ships in.



Notes;
1. Colombia, Chile, Imperial China and Thailand were Axis members, and their were pro-Axis movements in India,
however they are'nt shown as, with the exception of Chile, the core Axis had no intention of actually supporting them.

Axis War Aims.png
 
Last edited:
From my current project;

The War Aims of the Axis.


* Colored nations represent the Axis nations and places where their was major Axis support*.
* Light grey nations are puppets.
* White-Grey nations are places that the Axis did'nt care about so long as they were'nt trying anything funny.
* The English channel was to become 'Axis waters', that is a zone controlled by the Axis where the British,
French and a few others were forbidden from having anything but civil ships in.



Notes;
1. Colombia, Chile, Imperial China and Thailand were Axis members, and their were pro-Axis movements in India,
however they are'nt shown as, with the exception of Chile, the core Axis had no intention of actually supporting them.
Switzerland decided to stop being neutral?
 
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top