Alternate Wikipedia Infoboxes II

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can't take this infobox seriously because of That Picture. Also, who in their right mind would name a seat "Thieves' Quarter"?

Well, in that part of Crownport, the Thieves' Guild is extremely powerful and bribed a civil servant to name it Thieves' Quarter as a sort of boast to the other guilds.
Also, it's a nod to the popular fantasy trope of having thieves' quarters called such.
 
You really need to get an extension to your browser or an app on your device to copy and paste all the parts of your infobox together so we can see the entire thing. What kind of device do you use for making infoboxes- an iPad or something else?

I use an iPad and I just connect the pics in Photoshop Touch with relative ease.
 
Well, in that part of Crownport, the Thieves' Guild is extremely powerful and bribed a civil servant to name it Thieves' Quarter as a sort of boast to the other guilds.
Also, it's a nod to the popular fantasy trope of having thieves' quarters called such.
Hmm, I would've thought it'd be one of those "it had a different name, but everyone has called it X for so long that the government gave up and made it official" deals.
 
Hmm, I would've thought it'd be one of those "it had a different name, but everyone has called it X for so long that the government gave up and made it official" deals.

It may be like that.
It's just called the Thieves' Quarter. People have called it that for nearly a millennium and there's no other name for that part of town. There's just no other name for the government to call it.
 
A hopeful goal for a thread I am about to post.

BookerTWashington.PNG
 
Why is a Socialist like Eugene Debs a Republican's veep?
Or is Washington left-wing?
I felt that the Republican Party is the most likely to go in a liberal direction in that era. Although I see Booker as more of a moderating Obama-like figure. So you could take it in multiple ways. Either Debs is on the ticket as a Coalition ticket between the Republicans and Socialists, or Debs has experienced an entirely different life since the Socialist Reformation happened while he was still a child.

I think I prefer the latter interpretation.
 
Debs was a Democrat before he was a Socialist, tho. And the GOP was big with the rich capitalists so to claim they're the more likely to go leftist is... well... debatable.
 
ymCLiMF.png


The U.S. Faith Party was founded by Rick Santorum and other members of the New Christian Policy Council (NCPC) in 2021. Having become disillusioned with the Republican party after his failed 2016 presidential run, Santorum announced in 2018, that he "had accidentally marked independent when renewing [his] voter registration, and decided that [he] thought it looked better that way." In 2019, Santorum helped co-found the NCPC, which served as a forum for evangelical leaders to discuss the future of politics in the country, and the role that evangelicals and their allies should search for. The 2016 and 2018 elections caused significant discontent in the evangelical right, who felt used and abandoned by the GOP. With the signs of the breakdown of the two-party system emerging in 2020, Santorum argued that the christian right needed to form its own political engine if religious politics were to remain relevant in the country. In early 2021, the NPEC voted in favor of Santorum's proposal, and the Faith Party came into existence. The Faith Party was originally conceived as to be economically center-left, while socially conservative. Its platform took a vaguely social-democratic stance on most economic issues, while affirming a commitment to evangelical social doctrine. This way, it would be theoretically possible to unite the religious left and right, which could serve as a sizable base. However, throughout the 2020s, both Santorum and the party's economic ideology began to shift noticeably to the left. Part of it had to do with Santorum getting back in touch with his leftist, European relatives, and part of it had to do with Santorum's reading when formulating the party's platform. While the official platform drew upon more modern progressive economics, Santorum also began reading about America's earlier christian socialists, as well as other leftists, and he took a peculiar liking to Karl Kautsky's Communism in Central Europe at the Time of the Reformation, as well as some early Synthesis Marxist writings. By 2025, Santorum was willing to mention in private that he saw himself as a Christian Socialist. By 2028, when he was hospitalized for stomach cancer, Santorum affirmed that he believed, "Jesus would probably have been some type of communist. Not the bad type, but a good one." His reaction to the announcement of the Vienna Consensus in 2029, to which he simply responded, "fuckers," a rare expletive from the former senator. This coarse response, however, was enough to give the Faith Party, which Santorum had centralized around his leadership, a go-ahead to shift farther to the left and become involved in anti-government activities.

In its 2032 platform, the Faith Party explicitly endorsed Synthesis Marxism as an economic and political ideology. In 2033, the Faith Party established its own paramilitary wing, the Sons of Jehu. The Sons of Jehu became one of the founding members of the Revolutionary Alliance when it was formally established in 2035. While the Sons of Jehu and the Faith Party participated in the May 31st Revolution, and were successful in seizing their delegated targets in the early weeks of the rebellion, reports of violence and brutality from across the country made the party leadership rethink their decision to abet the revolution. The Sons of Jehu announced its withdrawal from the alliance, and the Faith Party signed a ceasefire agreement with the American Moderate Party government. In exchange for handing over their weapons and seized equipment to the government, the Sons of Jehu officially disbanding, and turning over intelligence on other members of the Revolutionary Alliance, the Faith Party and its members would be granted political amnesty from their role in the revolution. While this action got the party decried as cowards and traitors by their former allies, and while it forced the party Chairman to personally fly to Cairo and beg Ihsan Farraj himself for entrance to the Fifth International, it did allow the Faith Party to remain a legal party during Reconstruction and the 2040s, where it became the U.S.'s 2nd largest party in the period, with 24% of House and 15% of Senate seats at its peak. However, with the return of free elections in 2052, the Faith Party quickly lost support. Most of Faith's voters are now either ultra-conservatives protest voting against the AMP and the other parties, or those who feel personal loyalty to the Faith party for saving them from experiencing a violent siege by the government. However, with both of these groups now starting to either die off or lose their loyalty, the Faith Party will likely slide into utter irrelevance.

neVm00S.png
 
Last edited:
Real fascinating stuff there, machinekng

Kind of weird to see Santorum become a socialist, but I like it

I've always had a soft spot for Christian socialism/communism, and it's good to see them used more often--even if they are largely irrelevant
 
Real fascinating stuff there, machinekng

Kind of weird to see Santorum become a socialist, but I like it

I've always had a soft spot for Christian socialism/communism, and it's good to see them used more often--even if they are largely irrelevant

Well, with Santorum's rhetoric having shifted towards the left on economic issues, I just decided that it'd be interesting/amusing if this trend continued in a linear fashion towards its' endpoint.
 
Debs was a Democrat before he was a Socialist, tho. And the GOP was big with the rich capitalists so to claim they're the more likely to go leftist is... well... debatable.
So were the Democrats. The Republicans paid lip service to racial issues at least for a time. Both parties also had anti-corruption candidates.
 
Clearly something happened to shatter the duopoly. You mentioned a Democratic Progressive Party in the 2020s, and now this "Faith" Party as well.

Rick Santorum revealing himself for what he truly was, a communist? Interesting. :p (He's probably a real conservative, but it's amusing to think about.)
 
Clearly something happened to shatter the duopoly. You mentioned a Democratic Progressive Party in the 2020s, and now this "Faith" Party as well.

Rick Santorum revealing himself for what he truly was, a communist? Interesting. :p (He's probably a real conservative, but it's amusing to think about.)

Well, technically the Democratic Progressive Party only lasted for a year before they lost the right to the name due to being sued by the Democratic Party for trademark violation. This was enough to burn through the fledgling breakaway party's coffers, forcing them to declare bankruptcy. However, the American Labor Party the was formed later that year ended up including a lot of the same people, so not much difference, I guess. :p

Anyways, I'm purposely keeping the 2010s and early 2020s fairly vague for now, because I don't want to have to rewrite a good chunk of the backstory in year or two down the road.
 
At that time, the parties weren't terrible ideological. You had a broad spectrum of candidates in both parties.
Yeah. In 1934, you had Upton Sinclair running as a Democrat on a socialist platform while Vito Marcantonio was elected to the House as a socialist Republican.
I'm afraid I do not understand. I thought you took issue that I made a Republican Socialist in 1900, but now it seems like you're saying it doesn't matter which party the Socialist is from? Or was it just that I said Republicans were more likely to go left.

That said, the wikibox does need lots of work. Some of the names are place holders, I forgot the "Suceeded by" on the Presidential part, some of the print is too large (big oopsie there).

But on the other hand, a world where Booker T could be elected would have completely unrecognizable candidates to our own. Hmmm...

I think for Vice President I'll put in someone older... Let's say Benjamin Harrison? Then I'll put Daniel DeLeon as his sucessor (while we're having fun here). And that's just the first portion of the wikibox, I'll have to work my way down but I feel like the form itself is pretty good (big text not-with-standing).

We'll call it a work in progress. :cool:
 
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top