A lot of the loans being for roads, ports, mines, etc. that are to be manufactured using Chinese labor and equipment and then to export raw materials to China. It might vary, though.Except nowadays, China is the world's largest creditor and Africa is an increasing recipient of Chinese loans with Zambia being the first to default on debt mostly owed to China. China, UAE, and India are also the top three export destinations for Africa:
For sure, I was talking about the sentiment. Regarding the map itself or the accuracy of how it depicts potential events, the less said the better.I'm sympathetic to the view that western aid and economic entanglements, while perhaps abating suffering in the short term, may be holding these countries back from developing and ultimately doing more harm than good.
However - in the short term there would be a tremendous amount of upheaval, and it's unlikely that the exact boundaries of the post-colonial states would survive. The only change to colonial borders I can make out in sub-Saharan Africa is in Nigeria with its absorption of Cameroon, though Cameroon has just been absorbed wholesale within its boundaries.
EDIT: Also Mali absorbed Mauretania, but again it's just a 1:1 incorporation.
View attachment 886500
the British Isles in Looked Better in Gold, aka what if everything went wrong (or right, depending on your viewpoint) due to there being no ww1
i like thisView attachment 886500
the British Isles in Looked Better in Gold, aka what if everything went wrong (or right, depending on your viewpoint) due to there being no ww1
- Belfast and Gibraltar are the only 2 UKs, with belfast being pro-russia, and Gibraltar being pro-argentina (long story)Are Belfast and Gibraltar governments the only UKs or are there more? And what is the difference between them (Going by the flag UK Gibraltar seems to be run by the Royal Navy)?
Do either of them actually still have a monarchy? Is it the same monarch?- Belfast and Gibraltar are the only 2 UKs, with belfast being pro-russia, and Gibraltar being pro-argentina (long story)
- belfast is more orangeist and conservative, and Gibraltar is more liberal (and belfast committed treason while the government was trying to calm down ireland), with a strong farmer-labour offshoot mainly in Newfoundland and the Falklands
- Gibraltar is essentially a navy with a state, with them having the ~10th largest navy in the world
Someone cooked here. Is the POD earlier or Argentina manage to exploit its development to become a world power with a 1914 POD?Gibraltar being pro-argentina
both of them do still have a monarchy, although Belfast's is effectively a hostage (with him being the first one not to be a member of the Orange Order since the 1920s), and Gibraltar's more of a humanitarian than a leaderDo either of them actually still have a monarchy? Is it the same monarch?
the pod's 1868, with Andrew Johnson's impeachment succeeding, leading to the democrats collapsing (although they last ran a candidate in '84, they only won arkansas) and the various republican factions becoming the political partiesSomeone cooked here. Is the POD earlier or Argentina manage to exploit its development to become a world power with a 1914 POD?
A world stuck in a very long 19th century sounds very interesting. Do you have any more maps/graphics/documents from this timeline?
Old map I found in my documents folder, premise was a US that never formed and a world stuck in a very long 19th century, the former Dukedom and current United Provinces of the Carolinas
For a second that flag got me very confused, "oh Islamic Carolina".Old map I found in my documents folder, premise was a US that never formed and a world stuck in a very long 19th century, the former Dukedom and current United Provinces of the Carolinas
I also find the concept of a world stuck in a very long 19th century to be very interesting.A world stuck in a very long 19th century sounds very interesting. Do you have any more maps/graphics/documents from this timeline?
For the Duke Jackson I Wyle is the letter in the middle an initial (though I suppose then it would have a dot after it, unless it is like with Harry S Truman) or is it saying he is the first Jackson Wyle? Then again, since this is an old map you probably would not remember it. Still, i find it interesting how they would either use the full name or a different numbering system for their monarch.
Old map I found in my documents folder, premise was a US that never formed and a world stuck in a very long 19th century, the former Dukedom and current United Provinces of the Carolinas
For the Duke Jackson I Wyle is the letter in the middle an initial (though I suppose then it would have a dot after it, unless it is like with Harry S Truman) or is it saying he is the first Jackson Wyle? Then again, since this is an old map you probably would not remember it. Still, i find it interesting how they would either use the full name or a different numbering system for their monarch.
I am wondering where, as it does not seem like something that would go on either contemporary articles, serious historical books, or even children’s books, especially not for Henry VIII. Though perhaps if it was a chart or something showing various kings from multiple kingdoms, and translating ever Karl and Caroline and Charles etc to the same word (and Henrys and Heinrichs) then maybe it would work. And of course you have other unusual thighs, like sticking Cardinal between two names, so there is also always the possibility that the honors of naming order used to be different.It is quite normal?
Henry VIII Tudor or wording like that is a style I have seen before elsewhere.