Map Thread XXII

View attachment 884787

In a short summary, France never invaded Russia in 1812 and continued to bog down the British. Eventually, the British were forced to concede in 1816 and the Treaty of Ghent recognized French control over Europe. Napoleon would crush the Spanish guerilla fighters, though animosity between the French and Spaniards persists. Napoleon would continue to rule over France until 1826, when after years of poor health, he died of cancer. Napoleon II would become the new emperor of France, however, his rule was very unstable and due to inexperience, was constantly fought over by various politicians influencing his policies. The other European powers took notice, and so in 1827, a new coalition of Britain, Austria, Prussia, and Russia was launched. They were much more successful in this war with a divided and less powerful France, however, Napoleon II was able to prevent any invasion of France proper and made a peace treaty to the new coalition, recognizing Portuguese, Naples, Sardinian and Dutch independence (Although the Netherlands would be ruled by a Napoleon), hand over some land to Austria, Prussia and Russia, and reduce France territory to its sister states. As of 1836, France still reigns supreme over Europe, however, its rule is still shaky, with various nationalist movements, a coalition that keeps an eye on France, and a divided government, it still remains to be seen how long can France retain its control over the continent.
Wonder how unstable the situation in the Confederation of the Rhine is.
 
As I sit in holy contemplation 'neath th'old dogwood tree,
A melody of liberty the angels doth sing to me;
The hevn'ly host cries out for glory, honor and liberty—
For Virginia do we sing!
Oh,
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
And,
Glory, glory, to Virginia!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
For freedom do we sing!

— Excerpt from "Old Glory," a common Virginian marching song during the Second War of Nullification (or, the "Crusade for Liberty")
(1886; set to the tune of a traditional American hymn)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Remember ole Virginny,
how she flew her field of blue,
O'er Baltimore and Cincinnati,
comrades tried and true;
Remember dear old Providence,
remember too her crew!
Our Union marches on!
Oh,
Glory, glory to our Union!
Glory, glory to our Union!
And down with,
Gory, gory ole Virginia!
To Richmond we march on!

— Excerpt from "Letter to Richmond," a satire of "Old Glory" especially popular among the Armed Forces of Pennsylvania and Ohio
(1887; as published in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette )

View attachment 884785

A little scenario I knocked out between reading for classes. Based on the long-term consequences of an amended Articles of Confederation. Let's say Roger Sherman couldn't make it to the so-called "Constitutional Convention." Instead of the Convention as we know it, the framers instead merely established a stronger taxing power for certain enumerated powers, but remained strictly a Congress of listed, enumerated powers to ensure internal commerce and provide for mutual defense (rather than a central federal government with sweeping implied powers). Additionally, any power delegated to the Congress remained delegated by the States, rather than by the people of the states.

Depicted is the moment of the seminal Fourth Amendment, issued after a vicious industrial war between the states. The Fourth Amendment would (a) forbid secession and (b) establish the powers of Congress as "non-contradictable." While the Amendment itself was narrow in scope, it had vast implications for the nature of the relationship between Congress and the States, and would serve as the basis for future amendments' creation of a true federal system further into the century.
whats that Louisiana nation about?
 
Which POD is this? since I can see Austria-Hungary in there.
PoD for that is 1940s where the Iron Curtain in the Balkans is slightly further east and south and AH is reunified by Otto with the support of Britain and France to be a strong central European buffer between the two blocs.
 
Very handsome map, but aside from maybe Swedish Pomerania, I don't see anything gained by Prussia vs OTL 1812 borders, and I'm not spotting any Russian gains, either.
For Prussia it was Swedish Pomerania, for Russia now that I think about yeah they didn't gain anything. I probably should have had both of them expand even further into Poland and the Confederation of Rhine.
 
Last edited:
PoD for that is 1940s where the Iron Curtain in the Balkans is slightly further east and south and AH is reunified by Otto with the support of Britain and France to be a strong central European buffer between the two blocs.
Good luck getting Tito and the Yugoslavs (with Soviet backing) to let that happen
 
Posting my contribution to the recent Telephone Map Game, featuring what's left of the Roman Republic after the Sertorian War and Third Servile Revolt go much more poorly for it:

TMG-13.png
 
whats that Louisiana nation about?
A different French Revolution meant that France ended up with Louisiana as well as other Spanish colonies like Santo Domingo (Cuba was acquired later). However, with further internal turmoil in France and an attempt to reimpose slavery in the colonies, sometime in the late ninteenth century the colonies voted to declare their independence as the Confederated Republic of Marianna with assistance of the Royal Navy. Haiti originally went its own way, but its history is sad as always.

Really, the French government is more than happy with the arrangement; it's a very Canada-esque situation that most in politics saw coming from a mile away as the mainland grew more heavily populated, especially as non-French immigrants flooded into the Great Plains.
 
PoD for that is 1940s where the Iron Curtain in the Balkans is slightly further east and south and AH is reunified by Otto with the support of Britain and France to be a strong central European buffer between the two blocs.

Tito (and any other Yugoslavian government) and Soviet Union never would accept that.

And how did Canada get Alaska?
 
Good luck getting Tito and the Yugoslavs (with Soviet backing) to let that happen
Tito (and any other Yugoslavian government) and Soviet Union never would accept that.

And how did Canada get Alaska?
There's actually not much lore for the map that I've developed but I'll say that Tito died during the war and a better performance by the UK and France resulted in Croatia and Bosnia being firmly in the western sphere.

Alaska was sold to Canada by the US after the rather poorly thought out Second Pacific War (with the Chinese vs the Americans and Japanese) turned into a second Vietnam and ended up bankrupting the USA.
 
Posting my contribution to the recent Telephone Map Game
Cross posting as well from Telephone Map Game 13th Edition
The map i received was a religious map of Eurasia and parts of North Africa. I saw that the region of the Eastern Roman Empire was protestant and so drew a map based off of the spread of protestantism in the Romantine Empire.

The Romantine Empire was my interpretation of the Holy Roman Empire, plus a great wall of Rome to keep the pesky Bulgars out. Which in the next map after me made by @Epsilon Tauri ironically saw the Bulgars conquer the Romantine Empire.

dg4sdyk-414b95d7-4923-45b7-88d1-acee06cddc98.png
 
View attachment 885016
The Weimar Republic in 2024.

Just call it Brandenburg, having "Prussia" and East Prussia (with the former not being West Prussia, which presumably is a part of Poland) doesn't make much sense.

I understand reasoning for getting rid of the overall Prussia to make Prussian provinces into German states, and some annexations and border changes happening does make sense. But this still somewhat feels like too much of a divorce from original Weimar states rather than a really believable evolution of them, atleast in my opinion.

Why Euromark anyway?
 
Just call it Brandenburg, having "Prussia" and East Prussia (with the former not being West Prussia, which presumably is a part of Poland) doesn't make much sense.

I understand reasoning for getting rid of the overall Prussia to make Prussian provinces into German states, and some annexations and border changes happening does make sense. But this still somewhat feels like too much of a divorce from original Weimar states rather than a really believable evolution of them, atleast in my opinion.

Why Euromark anyway?
I like your reasoning, I and i'll definitely consider it.
There was significant state reform in the 1990s, after the Prussian socialist dominance ended, which led to the decline of Prussia and its breakup.
The EuroMark is a product of a more German-Centric EU. (The Netherlands, Luxembourg, Belgium, Austria, Switzerland,Poland, Czechoslovakia)
 
For Prussia it was Swedish Pomerania, for Russia now that I think about yeah they didn't gain anything. I probably should have had both of them expand even further into Poland and the Confederation of Rhine.
Or possibly take it off the map altogether. Given that it is entirely surrounded by French enemies, for Poland to continue to exist as anything other than a Russian or Austrian puppet, France needs to Win A Lot.
 
Top