The Fascist Republic of India: An alternate history of Independent India

As decolonisation happens, the new countries will look upto India even more than they did OTL. It will only have pariah status from the UK and some American factions. And the Nazis in India has not been much publicised. The spies would be there but everyone wants to have India on their side. The British had one card to play to weaken India and that was to divide it into many states. That has not materialised and now the erstwhile British Raj is under the heavily centralised rule of a dictator.
Admittedly Indian economy is really "too big" to become a pariah state, the British and Indians hate each other and it will remain that way for many years to come.



Now unless the Americans and Soviets are able to somehow come to an agreement in the UN that India most hand over the war criminals (with or without evidence). Then I see no chance of any of the nations being able to successfully isolate India and turn it into a pariah state because of the existence of the Cold War and both sides fighting for influence across the planet.

For example if the Soviets ruin the relationship they have with India then America will happily replace them and their naval port in Karachi, even with internal resistance and condemnation from the Jewish peoples and others that suffered from the holocaust.

If America instead ruins their relationship with India then the Soviets vice-versa will replace the Americans and take over their naval port in Kolkata. Even if the KGB continues to attempt to assassinate the Nazi's and the Communist Party is unhappy with the existence of the man who created the Einsatzgruppen...

There is certainly going to be International sanctions happening and nations that refuse to trade or allow Indian ships and aircraft the rights of passage, but it won't be enough to turn the nation into a International pariah.
 
UCC does not imposition of Hindu law. Far too many muslims of OTL pak and Bangladesh in India now.
That's the catch-22 with UCC. There is really no middle ground enrage all with something completely foreign like a Christian like code or other European laws, basically a highly modified Hindu Code and enrage Muslims and a significantly modified Muslim Code that enrages Hindus and to an extent the Muslims. There is practically no middle ground that can satisfy all but plenty of way to make everyone unhappy.
2.)Nukes estimate Bhabha is only an estimate
Dr. Bhabha gave a two year estimate to Nehru in 1962 which was considered optimistic despite India have operational Uranium Mines, Nuclear Reactor and starting work on a power station the following year and a nuclear test for "peaceful purposes"being on the cards from at least 1958.
It is a euphemism for Bose wanting to establish a working navy so he could take those islands. This will be the source of conflict between the states and India. By the time Truman goes and the next administration comes, India will get closer to the soviets but as the Chinese commies win, both India and USA will have to reevaluate their choices.
Building a navy from the scratch would take decades and certainly not a couple of years. The officers corp is practically non existent. Ships need to be purchased. Officers and technicians trained, docks and ports developed, shipyards made. It certainly cannot happen by the time Admiral Nimitz comes whenever that is. Again US asking for a naval base in Kolkata is odd as it's a river port. A far more suitable place would be Waltair(Visakhapatnam) with its excellent natural harbour like Karachi has for the Soviets.
The railway line is not government project it is being undertaken by the Jammu and Kashmir princely state. India claiming that infrastructure has been built does not mean that it is reliable. In a conflict with the Chinese(who have a similar infrastructure), these roads and the rail line will play a crucial role.
Look the airport is quite feasible at Damsung or with significant work at Gonggar but a road isn't and certainly not with the J&K state budget they can hardly afford to build a line into the valley. The 1902 or the 1907 proposal can be done probably but no more and even that would take years to build. 1800+ kms is just the distance from leh and at least a decade of work is needed before any line reaches Leh. Again developing the mountain tracks to all weather roads to Ladakh will itself take at least a couple of years. Maintaining 40000 troops in Tibet is going to cost more than maintaining 150000 troops in the plains due the logistical challenge. The best strategy is to open routes through Ladakh (Demchok), Mana pass in now Uttrakhand, Nathula in Sikkim, Tawang and another in eastern North East Frontier Agency towards the Amdo region of Tibet. U-Tsang is the only region that can be held on against the eventual Chinese onslaught. Kham has to be abandoned and the deciding theatre would be Amdo. In case Amdo becomes untenable then the Tsangpo watershed with its snow clad mountains would be the ideal and excellent defensive position guarding the Brahmaputra valley and the U-Tsang region. The exact border North of the Tsangpo watershed is upto you but it would be at a point in where the Chinese and Indian power projection capabilities reach its limits (likely the point beyond which the other power can deploy greater air power possibly just north of the band of Tibetan lakes) If Nepal agrees then the Korala border crossing, the lowest and widest of all would later become the main artery connecting Tibet and most able to support the movement of mechanized forces. Only Demchok would nearly as capable as this crossing. Holding onto Karakoram in the North, North of the Tibetan lakes in the middle and the Brahmaputra watershed in the east gives an excellent defensive position for India and the rump Tibet.
Lastly buddy, I am greatly appreciative of constructive criticism.
See the pace at which India is developing infrastructure and making reforms is too too much too too fast. Time would be needed to get back into international financial system, achieve internal stability and make economic progress. It is very possibile that it happens significantly faster than OTL but not that fast. Your India is probably doing a decades worth of work in within the short wartime period.

Bose wasn't a totalitarian unless he contracts the syndrome of "absolute power absolutely corrupts" and even ITTL he is acting like a consensus builder. Hopefully India will become a democracy otherwise inevitable corruption would rot the system. People show that China, South Korea and Taiwan developed under Totalitarianism but that actually wasn't the case. South Korea and Taiwan was received the access to Western markets early due to being an ally and their educated populace developed economically and the growth was sustained under democratic rule. China had that meteoric growth due a specific set of circumstances where the US relocated it's industry at the end of the cold war. Bose's India is just him, no party, no military just him and the other groups coalescing around him for the time being and that's a dangerous combination.
 
You know I'm curious how the movements like the Mau Mau rebellion or the Algeria,Angolan Wars of Independence etc will go. From the OP's comments it seems that India's Independence will inspire many more violent uprisings which India will actively support. Also seeing how India overthrew it's European overlords, the reaction of South Africa will be Interesting, will they double down on Apartheid or will they slowly phase it Out?
 
See the pace at which India is developing infrastructure and making reforms is too too much too too fast. Time would be needed to get back into international financial system, achieve internal stability and make economic progress. It is very possibile that it happens significantly faster than OTL but not that fast. Your India is probably doing a decades worth of work in within the short wartime period.

Bose wasn't a totalitarian unless he contracts the syndrome of "absolute power absolutely corrupts" and even ITTL he is acting like a consensus builder. Hopefully India will become a democracy otherwise inevitable corruption would rot the system. People show that China, South Korea and Taiwan developed under Totalitarianism but that actually wasn't the case. South Korea and Taiwan was received the access to Western markets early due to being an ally and their educated populace developed economically and the growth was sustained under democratic rule. China had that meteoric growth due a specific set of circumstances where the US relocated it's industry at the end of the cold war. Bose's India is just him, no party, no military just him and the other groups coalescing around him for the time being and that's a dangerous combination.
Functionally speaking, USSR breaks all these myths by having extremely high levels of growth over a short period of time and all on its own without any support. India here has support of not one but both the superpowers as well as a Dictatorial leadership that would help in growth. Bose of a Dictator, something like Ataturk, where he felt that India must be a dictatorship atleast until it developed basic social and economic structures. It is not out of character for him to do so here
 
You know I'm curious how the movements like the Mau Mau rebellion or the Algeria,Angolan Wars of Independence etc will go. From the OP's comments it seems that India's Independence will inspire many more violent uprisings which India will actively support. Also seeing how India overthrew it's European overlords, the reaction of South Africa will be Interesting, will they double down on Apartheid or will they slowly phase it Out?
All the colonised peoples now want their own Bose.
 
That's the catch-22 with UCC. There is really no middle ground enrage all with something completely foreign like a Christian like code or other European laws, basically a highly modified Hindu Code and enrage Muslims and a significantly modified Muslim Code that enrages Hindus and to an extent the Muslims. There is practically no middle ground that can satisfy all but plenty of way to make everyone unhappy.

Dr. Bhabha gave a two year estimate to Nehru in 1962 which was considered optimistic despite India have operational Uranium Mines, Nuclear Reactor and starting work on a power station the following year and a nuclear test for "peaceful purposes"being on the cards from at least 1958.

Building a navy from the scratch would take decades and certainly not a couple of years. The officers corp is practically non existent. Ships need to be purchased. Officers and technicians trained, docks and ports developed, shipyards made. It certainly cannot happen by the time Admiral Nimitz comes whenever that is. Again US asking for a naval base in Kolkata is odd as it's a river port. A far more suitable place would be Waltair(Visakhapatnam) with its excellent natural harbour like Karachi has for the Soviets.

Look the airport is quite feasible at Damsung or with significant work at Gonggar but a road isn't and certainly not with the J&K state budget they can hardly afford to build a line into the valley. The 1902 or the 1907 proposal can be done probably but no more and even that would take years to build. 1800+ kms is just the distance from leh and at least a decade of work is needed before any line reaches Leh. Again developing the mountain tracks to all weather roads to Ladakh will itself take at least a couple of years. Maintaining 40000 troops in Tibet is going to cost more than maintaining 150000 troops in the plains due the logistical challenge. The best strategy is to open routes through Ladakh (Demchok), Mana pass in now Uttrakhand, Nathula in Sikkim, Tawang and another in eastern North East Frontier Agency towards the Amdo region of Tibet. U-Tsang is the only region that can be held on against the eventual Chinese onslaught. Kham has to be abandoned and the deciding theatre would be Amdo. In case Amdo becomes untenable then the Tsangpo watershed with its snow clad mountains would be the ideal and excellent defensive position guarding the Brahmaputra valley and the U-Tsang region. The exact border North of the Tsangpo watershed is upto you but it would be at a point in where the Chinese and Indian power projection capabilities reach its limits (likely the point beyond which the other power can deploy greater air power possibly just north of the band of Tibetan lakes) If Nepal agrees then the Korala border crossing, the lowest and widest of all would later become the main artery connecting Tibet and most able to support the movement of mechanized forces. Only Demchok would nearly as capable as this crossing. Holding onto Karakoram in the North, North of the Tibetan lakes in the middle and the Brahmaputra watershed in the east gives an excellent defensive position for India and the rump Tibet.

See the pace at which India is developing infrastructure and making reforms is too too much too too fast. Time would be needed to get back into international financial system, achieve internal stability and make economic progress. It is very possibile that it happens significantly faster than OTL but not that fast. Your India is probably doing a decades worth of work in within the short wartime period.

Bose wasn't a totalitarian unless he contracts the syndrome of "absolute power absolutely corrupts" and even ITTL he is acting like a consensus builder. Hopefully India will become a democracy otherwise inevitable corruption would rot the system. People show that China, South Korea and Taiwan developed under Totalitarianism but that actually wasn't the case. South Korea and Taiwan was received the access to Western markets early due to being an ally and their educated populace developed economically and the growth was sustained under democratic rule. China had that meteoric growth due a specific set of circumstances where the US relocated it's industry at the end of the cold war. Bose's India is just him, no party, no military just him and the other groups coalescing around him for the time being and that's a dangerous combination.
At this point of time, the people will do anything Bose asks them to. Dont compare it with today's India. Muslim League endorsed Bose so muslim separatism is dead(or on the backburner at least). Regarding Hindu majoritarianism, Bose is a strict secularist and his policies and speeches reflect that. Even if people might be initially unhappy with UCC(which will not directly affect religious practices), they are going to do what Bose says.

I'll take your points regarding Tibet into consideration.

Well the thing is that while that work is being sanctioned at a very quick pace, completing it will certainly take time. But approval is going to be quick. And regarding reforms, I disagree there. Reforms are going to be implemented much more quickly than infrastructure.

Um, Bose has about 2 million soldiers ready to do his bidding. Add to that the entire Indian population which is endeared to him, since he has the approval endorsement of both Gandhi and Jinnah. Bose's intention was to bring in democracy at a much later point since now he intends to remove British-era practices and devise Indian ones. Regarding the navy, Bose has picked up a beef with the Americans over the ports not being immediately handed over. While the navy will take quite a lot of time to develop, he has benefactors(the Soviets or the next American administration) which will help maintain control of the islands.
 
You know I'm curious how the movements like the Mau Mau rebellion or the Algeria,Angolan Wars of Independence etc will go. From the OP's comments it seems that India's Independence will inspire many more violent uprisings which India will actively support. Also seeing how India overthrew it's European overlords, the reaction of South Africa will be Interesting, will they double down on Apartheid or will they slowly phase it Out?
It would seem to me, India might trade assimilation for its citizens in Pretoria, for an Enemy of my enemy is my friend, alliance
 
Functionally speaking, USSR breaks all these myths by having extremely high levels of growth over a short period of time and all on its own without any support. India here has support of not one but both the superpowers as well as a Dictatorial leadership that would help in growth. Bose of a Dictator, something like Ataturk, where he felt that India must be a dictatorship atleast until it developed basic social and economic structures. It is not out of character for him to do so here
Exactly. Bose wants shit to happen. He has the resources(from both the Soviets and the Americans) to make it happen and he has virtually no opposition(at least for now).

One key thing about Netaji's dictatorship is that it is not personal glory for him. He is all-in to build up India. No interest in power for power's sake.
 
At this point of time, the people will do anything Bose asks them to. Dont compare it with today's India. Muslim League endorsed Bose so muslim separatism is dead(or on the backburner at least). Regarding Hindu majoritarianism, Bose is a strict secularist and his policies and speeches reflect that. Even if people might be initially unhappy with UCC(which will not directly affect religious practices), they are going to do what Bose says.

I'll take your points regarding Tibet into consideration.

Well the thing is that while that work is being sanctioned at a very quick pace, completing it will certainly take time. But approval is going to be quick. And regarding reforms, I disagree there. Reforms are going to be implemented much more quickly than infrastructure.

Um, Bose has about 2 million soldiers ready to do his bidding. Add to that the entire Indian population which is endeared to him, since he has the approval endorsement of both Gandhi and Jinnah. Bose's intention was to bring in democracy at a much later point since now he intends to remove British-era practices and devise Indian ones. Regarding the navy, Bose has picked up a beef with the Americans over the ports not being immediately handed over. While the navy will take quite a lot of time to develop, he has benefactors(the Soviets or the next American administration) which will help maintain control of the islands.
Perhaps the Parsee community could be coopted as a source of great economic improvement is a quasi-corporatist system.
 
Functionally speaking, USSR breaks all these myths by having extremely high levels of growth over a short period of time and all on its own without any support. India here has support of not one but both the superpowers as well as a Dictatorial leadership that would help in growth. Bose of a Dictator, something like Ataturk, where he felt that India must be a dictatorship atleast until it developed basic social and economic structures. It is not out of character for him to do so here
It doesn't. USSR at the end of the Civil war reached a metaphorical rock bottom from where there was only going up. They claimed a massive 14% growth rate but current estimates place the real growth at 3-5% annually which is a decent rate and what the Weimar republic of the time and Indian sub-continent during the first 40 years of independence experienced. A major section of the growth was the reconstruction and the damage from the Civil War and the economic condition made the limited foreign investments and some state guided growth look impressive. and in the early 30s they were able to import a lot of capital goods and machine tools from the west cheaply due to the slump in their demand in the west due to the Great Depression which was again a certain circumstance thing. The growth was achieved at the cost of millions of deaths with a degree of totalitarianism seen only in North Korea. Ataturk, yes did a great thing by liberating vast swathes of land and then used his political capital to westernize the country and did not do much economically.

Congress before elections were ended in 1953 was the most democratic party in the world and Bose grew up in that ecosystem fighting for people's rights so he wouldn't be totalitarian. He was a consensus builder he left after being forcibly sidelined despite his overwhelming victory in Tripuri Congress session is the most defining characteristic of a democratic personality. He stepped down where he could have formed his own committee without having anything to do with Gandhi. He left as he couldn't build a consensus. After his return he does the same consensus building thing as apparent from the wide range of figures with whom he cooperates ITTL.
At this point of time, the people will do anything Bose asks them to. Dont compare it with today's India. Muslim League endorsed Bose so muslim separatism is dead(or on the backburner at least).
At this point yes but with a heavy hand he would burn through that goodwill and political capital like wildfire. I remember not mentioning muslim separatism in any of my post.
Even if people might be initially unhappy with UCC(which will not directly affect religious practices), they are going to do what Bose says.
Maybe it would be where his Political capital gets ruined. A compromise leaving everyone unhappy.
And regarding reforms, I disagree there. Reforms are going to be implemented much more quickly than infrastructure.
Half the bureaucracy including the officer corps in the police is lost due to the nature of the transition of power so reforms can't be implemented quickly and a piece of paper doesn't change ground reality.
Bose has about 2 million soldiers ready to do his bidding.
An army with a ridiculously small trained oficer corps and not a single high ranking officer trained or groomed for the post. But it can do a great job of beating its own people into submission to do the government's bidding like the Nigerian army during their civil war.
Exactly. Bose wants shit to happen. He has the resources(from both the Soviets and the Americans) to make it happen and he has virtually no opposition(at least for now).
Well the Cold Ear comes and the sides decide not to get played.
One key thing about Netaji's dictatorship is that it is not personal glory for him. He is all-in to build up India. No interest in power for power's sake.
Most dictators had that goal and ambition and fell into the disease called "absolute power corrupts absolutely".
 
It doesn't. USSR at the end of the Civil war reached a metaphorical rock bottom from where there was only going up. They claimed a massive 14% growth rate but current estimates place the real growth at 3-5% annually which is a decent rate and what the Weimar republic of the time and Indian sub-continent during the first 40 years of independence experienced. A major section of the growth was the reconstruction and the damage from the Civil War and the economic condition made the limited foreign investments and some state guided growth look impressive. and in the early 30s they were able to import a lot of capital goods and machine tools from the west cheaply due to the slump in their demand in the west due to the Great Depression which was again a certain circumstance thing. The growth was achieved at the cost of millions of deaths with a degree of totalitarianism seen only in North Korea. Ataturk, yes did a great thing by liberating vast swathes of land and then used his political capital to westernize the country and did not do much economically.

Congress before elections were ended in 1953 was the most democratic party in the world and Bose grew up in that ecosystem fighting for people's rights so he wouldn't be totalitarian. He was a consensus builder he left after being forcibly sidelined despite his overwhelming victory in Tripuri Congress session is the most defining characteristic of a democratic personality. He stepped down where he could have formed his own committee without having anything to do with Gandhi. He left as he couldn't build a consensus. After his return he does the same consensus building thing as apparent from the wide range of figures with whom he cooperates ITTL.
At this point yes but with a heavy hand he would burn through that goodwill and political capital like wildfire. I remember not mentioning muslim separatism in any of my post.
Maybe it would be where his Political capital gets ruined. A compromise leaving everyone unhappy.
Half the bureaucracy including the officer corps in the police is lost due to the nature of the transition of power so reforms can't be implemented quickly and a piece of paper doesn't change ground reality.
An army with a ridiculously small trained oficer corps and not a single high ranking officer trained or groomed for the post. But it can do a great job of beating its own people into submission to do the government's bidding like the Nigerian army during their civil war.
Well the Cold Ear comes and the sides decide not to get played.
Most dictators had that goal and ambition and fell into the disease called "absolute power corrupts absolutely".
Democratic values aren't lost on Bose. Right now, his major concern is to get all the British Raj territories under Independent India. Major social reforms will only be undertaken once the new rule is consolidated . That could take another decade.
Like you continuously mention the point about Netaji's incredible morality, that is exactly how he is ITTL. He has hardly had an year in power and other than Mussolini and Hitler, the world hasn't had any other major dictator. So Bose is going to get the opportunity to set a precedent. Plus the presence of the Mahatma and the entire Congress(which still possesses its internal democracy) is good enough to reign in his, uh Dictatorial leanings.
The army still is strong enough to take on India's immediate neighbours(Iran and China). Internal revolts are not going to happen anytime soon(just as they didn't under Nehru).

You have to see Netaji's rule as comparable to Nehru.
Nehru had Gandhi's endorsement. So does Bose.
Nehru ruled continuously until his death with a very weak opposition. Bose doesn't even have that weak opposition.
Nehru was one of the freedom fighters credited with negotiating independence. Netaji took independence single-handedly.
 
It doesn't. USSR at the end of the Civil war reached a metaphorical rock bottom from where there was only going up. They claimed a massive 14% growth rate but current estimates place the real growth at 3-5% annually which is a decent rate and what the Weimar republic of the time and Indian sub-continent during the first 40 years of independence experienced. A major section of the growth was the reconstruction and the damage from the Civil War and the economic condition made the limited foreign investments and some state guided growth look impressive. and in the early 30s they were able to import a lot of capital goods and machine tools from the west cheaply due to the slump in their demand in the west due to the Great Depression which was again a certain circumstance thing. The growth was achieved at the cost of millions of deaths with a degree of totalitarianism seen only in North Korea. Ataturk, yes did a great thing by liberating vast swathes of land and then used his political capital to westernize the country and did not do much economically.

Congress before elections were ended in 1953 was the most democratic party in the world and Bose grew up in that ecosystem fighting for people's rights so he wouldn't be totalitarian. He was a consensus builder he left after being forcibly sidelined despite his overwhelming victory in Tripuri Congress session is the most defining characteristic of a democratic personality. He stepped down where he could have formed his own committee without having anything to do with Gandhi. He left as he couldn't build a consensus. After his return he does the same consensus building thing as apparent from the wide range of figures with whom he cooperates ITTL.
At this point yes but with a heavy hand he would burn through that goodwill and political capital like wildfire. I remember not mentioning muslim separatism in any of my post.
Maybe it would be where his Political capital gets ruined. A compromise leaving everyone unhappy.
Half the bureaucracy including the officer corps in the police is lost due to the nature of the transition of power so reforms can't be implemented quickly and a piece of paper doesn't change ground reality.
An army with a ridiculously small trained oficer corps and not a single high ranking officer trained or groomed for the post. But it can do a great job of beating its own people into submission to do the government's bidding like the Nigerian army during their civil war.
Well the Cold Ear comes and the sides decide not to get played.
Most dictators had that goal and ambition and fell into the disease called "absolute power corrupts absolutely".
But USSR did survive the great depression and did become a world power. Compared to weimer republic which crumbled and OTL India, which has not done anything remarkable. And the other important aspect is that India will get foreign aid, much higher than OTL because of allowing USA AND USSR bases.

Bose was a consensus builder, but if you look at his writings, he very much wanted a dictatorship in the initial years for basic nation building. Which he felt was not possible with a democracy. He as also fascinated with Soviet Industrialization and German Militarism and wanted to combine both into India.

I do agree that India holding Tibet is far reaching. Probably loose it but soldify the border against China during the process
 
Last edited:
In regard to the Indian Navy, I believe that India may receive some Italian/German/Japanese ship as a form of reparation transfer from the US or the USSR. Even if some of these ships are already obsolete in 1945, it is better to have them than having none at all, but it is only my opinion. I think that the USSR would be really willing to lay hands on any ships available and then transfer them to India in exchange for political or economic gains.
 
In regard to the Indian Navy, I believe that India may receive some Italian/German/Japanese ship as a form of reparation transfer from the US or the USSR. Even if some of these ships are already obsolete in 1945, it is better to have them than having none at all, but it is only my opinion. I think that the USSR would be really willing to lay hands on any ships available and then transfer them to India in exchange for political or economic gains.
Its far more cheaper to get US Navy surplus vessels than whatever the heck the Axis powers had left floating around this time.

It should be noted that Japanese would have probably sent India some of their blueprints and licensing on how to build their cheap Kaibōkan (Coastal defense ship) type Diesel powered ships and other small vessels such as No.13-classs Submarine chasers and cheaper Submarine designs.
 
In regard to the Indian Navy, I believe that India may receive some Italian/German/Japanese ship as a form of reparation transfer from the US or the USSR. Even if some of these ships are already obsolete in 1945, it is better to have them than having none at all, but it is only my opinion. I think that the USSR would be really willing to lay hands on any ships available and then transfer them to India in exchange for political or economic gains.
And wouldn't the RIN be also a thing here?
 
Just a suggestion.

The Bay of Bengal, especially the area around the Andaman Islands holds one of the largest oil reserves in the world. So, exploring that resource should accelerate India's growth. Using the oil to forge a deal with the US will be very beneficial. I'd recommend the deal Saudis signed with the US for the short term. American companies extract the oil and American banks hold the money in their banks in USD for the Indian gov. While India might not be accepted as a NATO member, this deal should cut out Britain's hostility as the US will be looking at India as a valuable ally due to energy security. Entering the OPEC forum when it is formed in the 1960s should also be an advantage. @Aj chahal

Also, increase diamond mining. The Uranium deposits in Southern India should also be explored. There are also so many underperforming gold mines in the country. Increased productivity of gold should increase the purchasing power of India as gold and oil were very expensive at the height of the Cold War.
 
Last edited:
Just a suggestion.

The Bay of Bengal, especially the area around the Andaman Islands holds one of the largest oil reserves in the world. So, exploring that resource should accelerate India's growth. Using the oil to forge a deal with the US will be very beneficial. I'd recommend the deal Saudis signed with the US for the short term. American companies extract the oil and American banks hold the money in their banks in USD for the Indian gov. While India might not be accepted as a NATO member, this deal should cut out Britain's hostility as the US will be looking at India as a valuable ally due to energy security. Entering the OPEC forum when it is formed in the 1960s should also be an advantage. @Aj chahal

Also, increase diamond mining. The Uranium deposits in Southern India should also be explored. There are also so many underperforming gold mines in the country. Increased productivity of gold should increase the purchasing power of India as gold and oil were very expensive at the height of the Cold War.
Wait what? Oil in the Bay of Bengal? I have never heard of this.

Diamond and uranium mining should be done.
 
Tibet is a MAJOR geopolitical strategic area of interest for all powers in Asia specifically India and China because the 50% of the water from the Himalayas goes to India also 20% of the entire worlds population is supported by the Himalayan waters it’s a MASSIVE Strategic advantage and CCP China marched an army into Tibet in 1950 just for this reason declaring it an Integral part of China so I believe it’s important enough to fight china for it also I would think they Tibetans would see the benefits of Indian rule compared to a Communist Atheistic China in the coming years
I do not disagree with this as Tibet is really an important geopolitical area, I just think that India can not really hold Tibet especially if China does make a move on them
 
They still have 5 years till the Chinese Civil War is over and with Soviet and American helping India will be significantly more powerful than they are now and with a population that is pushing 340 Million and a dictatorship with fast efficient decisions, No politics, Stronger Economy, and less crime rate India will grow exponentially in the coming years and China being in a war against itself and Japan for 20 years will be war ridden and a war on this scale could cost china millions more lives
China would also have a benefactor, either USA or USSR depending on who wins the Civil war, It would have a much larger and more experienced army due to the civil wars and the Japanese invasion. It would also have a geographic advantage compared to India in regards to Tibet.

Its not that India cannot hold Tibet, its just that it is very difficult
 
Top