Not bad of a nurse eh.Checks notes. 211,579 births TTL as opposed to 119,179 OTL.
Not bad of a nurse eh.Checks notes. 211,579 births TTL as opposed to 119,179 OTL.
I would say here that the paratroopers can be retrieved and used again in Russia if they survive the clash which in German mind they should.The use of paratroopers in the Eastern Front doesn' t seem a waste for me. Indeed, there are more than 8 m. troops deployed there, but we are talking about a vast mass of land, so the density is not high at all. Furthermore, in my understanding, the Germans wanted to repeat what had happened in France. The difference was that the Soviets had way more strategic depth to retreat and regroup, while their major urban canters were much further from the front than those of France. And that means that there should be more high-mobility options for the Wermacht to encircle or bar retreat of the broken Soviet formations, before they can regroup or reach the urban centres. Therefore, a formitable (although light) paratrooper formation, capturing bridges or road and railway junctions against broken retreating Soviet units, with the panzers on their tail, could be succesfull and priceless.
This one is the best idea really here. If you think that this almost is done in Lemnos and Imbros some months before as mentioned ITTL. I would guess that they couldn't be supplied easily so close to the Greek front lines and with their fleet on guard the Turks couldn't support them either. To disrupt the supply line they would need either airfields, which they already have in Lemnos, or coastal artillery which needs ships to be transported. Small boats wouldn't do match due to destroyer escorts that the supply ships would certainly have. Now getting those islands would be a hit but taking them with light infantry and no artillery is a big drawback.(ninja-ed above)2. You didn't address the option of the German paratroopers used in a joint operation with the Turks to capture Chios and Lesvos. Maybe I am mistaken, but these islands, especially after Cythera and the onslaught in Asia Minor itself, shouldn't be that heavily guarded. At least, not heavily enough for the potential risk to outmatch the potential benefits. I doupt that the Greeks can spare enough troops to retake the islands if the Turkish army used some spare (including those sent to Iraq) troops to fortify them. And that means that Smyrna's supply line is doomed either by the airforces activity or even the use of small and fast torpedo boats, not to mention some heavy artilery that could be redeployed there (see Map 1). For how long and with what risk can the Greek and British navies can keep the 50km straight open? And for how long can a 200,000 strong garisson +several hundrend thousand civilians last without enough supplies? A couple of weeks? And after Smyrna falls, the vast majority of the Turkish army can be used elsewhere, taking the initiative instead of being tied down around Smyrna. After all, maybe the Turks have no clue, but the Germans know Barbarossa is comming, and they definatelly could use a few hundrend thousand Turkish troops at the Caucasus front aganst the Soviets. I mean, that any operation at the Asia Minor theatre is risky and hard, but the potential gains are so big that is hard to overlook.
Here I think the problem is the lack of airports to supply the troops. say they take the highlands around all those places in the Geek mainland(Amphilochia, Aitoliko & Antirio), what they do next if the frontline doesn't brake? They are closed behind lines without any hope of escape and with very limited supplies in a very hostile environment a recipe for disaster really. An attack in Euboea is the best operation due to the closeness in German supplies and its flanking capabilities on the Allied front. It would be a good escalation of the front and pressure the allies to breaking point. I give the benefit of the doubt that we don't know the strength of the Euboea garrison.3. For mainland Greece, I also thought of Normandy-like use. Remember that Greece is mountainous and while this is in favour of the defenders, it can be in favour of the attaking paratroopers, too. After all, their job is to capture essential targets and defend their possitions until the main body of their army arives. The mountainous terrain also means that the Greek army will find it really hard to redeploy men and artillery against the paratroopers to the rear of the frontline.
For example, if an Italian force lands near Astakos in Western Greece (Aetolia), while the Fallschirmjäger drop at Amphilochia, Etoliko and Antirrio, how fast and easily could the Greek army send their reserves before the invading army digs in, and how much of their artillery and airforce can they commit without stripping the frontline (see Map 2)?
The same for Euboea. If the Fallschirmjäger secure Chalkida while a landing force lands on the island, how soon could the Greek army sent enough reinforcements and redeploy artillery, before the Axis get control of the island (see Map3)?
I think that while it seems an interesting concept, but the whole idea of drooping paras far from the Front and wait/hope that the friendly forces would be able to connect with them in time. It'd seemed to be assuming that the friendly air forces would be able first to commit entirely to the operation and that, at least, they'd be able to contest the airspace over mainland Greece. Both things that, IMO, 'd be on this war stage, highly dubious...Here I think the problem is the lack of airports to supply the troops. say they take the highlands around all those places in the Geek mainland(Amphilochia, Aitoliko & Antirio), what they do next if the frontline doesn't brake? They are closed behind lines without any hope of escape and with very limited supplies in a very hostile environment a recipe for disaster really.
2. You didn't address the option of the German paratroopers used in a joint operation with the Turks to capture Chios and Lesvos. Maybe I am mistaken, but these islands, especially after Cythera and the onslaught in Asia Minor itself, shouldn't be that heavily guarded. At least, not heavily enough for the potential risk to outmatch the potential benefits. I doupt that the Greeks can spare enough troops to retake the islands if the Turkish army used some spare (including those sent to Iraq) troops to fortify them. And that means that Smyrna's supply line is doomed either by the airforces activity or even the use of small and fast torpedo boats, not to mention some heavy artilery that could be redeployed there (see Map 1). For how long and with what risk can the Greek and British navies can keep the 50km straight open? And for how long can a 200,000 strong garisson +several hundrend thousand civilians last without enough supplies? A couple of weeks? And after Smyrna falls, the vast majority of the Turkish army can be used elsewhere, taking the initiative instead of being tied down around Smyrna. After all, maybe the Turks have no clue, but the Germans know Barbarossa is comming, and they definatelly could use a few hundrend thousand Turkish troops at the Caucasus front aganst the Soviets. I mean, that any operation at the Asia Minor theatre is risky and hard, but the potential gains are so big that is hard to overlook.
I think the British can squeeze more capacity out of Benghazi just by having more suitable merchantmen.Berthing space in Benghazi was given as two large (max. 3,500 GRT, 7 m draft), one small vessel, and one tanker. Only eight Italian and four German merchants fitted that bill in September 1941. Those merchants which fitted Benghazi were further restricted by being able to only take itemized cargo or vehicles, but not both. Maximum realizable capacity was therefore seen as 45,000 tons/month, or 1,500 tons/day, even though recently daily discharge had reached rates up to 1,700 tons – but of course this was dependent to some extent on the types of goods being discharged, and their specific weight. Realistic capacity was assumed to be 1,000 tons/day.
My reply was to Lascaris's passing inquiry about the OTL absence of Ethiopians from the MTO. Nothing to do with TTL.The Greeks already occupied the Dodecanese though I thought? Honestly, I don't know how many more allied troops can fit into the Greek front, at least until they're ready for a counterattack. They're already going to have food and supply problems. Any Ethiopian manpower would probably go to Iraq or North Africa I think.
Lesvos and Chios without long range coastal guns are pretty useless. Even with long range guns at the closest it is 49km in a straight line between the two. Sure artillery of the era on both sides could cover this but at long range accuracy would be problematic...Although an airborne assault on Chios and Lesvos appears logical, there are two points to be made:
1. This will merely serve the Turks, not the Germans. The Germans are not concerned about the Smyrna's pocket, it's the Turks that want it.
2. Supplying paratroopers in Lesvos and Chios would be challenging.
3. Paratroopers alone cannot block the entrance to the Smyrna harbor, all the have is small arms. The Germans would need to bring in artillery and aircraft (which all need to be resupplied) to make a difference.
The Turks have actually quite a bit of leeway with the Germans compared to other axis minor allies, not least due to the crush the German leadership, Hitler included had on the Turkish nationalists in general and Kemal in particular. Which was not reciprocated on Kemal's part but this doesn't mean it can't be exploited to an extend.This would have been the best option but 3 different things work against it.
1) When it would have been most effective; before the Turkish navy was broken ITTL March 30th; Turkey was more co-belligerent than ally. Turkey has joined the war more out of opportunity than any deep affinity for the axis. Had the Allies/Greeks acquiesced to Turkish demands for their territory they would have stayed neutral at least in the short term. So there wasn't the time for pre-war joint planning between Turkey and Germany that would have made this feasible as part of an opening gambit.
The Turkish navy is certainly very much outclassed by the Greeks and British particularly in combination, the Greeks could and did spend a fair bit more money in the interwar for their navy after all. This does not mean the TDK is out of the fight though. They've lost a coastal defence ship, a light cruiser and a single destroyer in the battle of Lesvos. Painful but they still have a panzerschiff, one light cruiser and 11 destroyers plus 14 submarines, though these are of varying qualities and the submarine force rather young the first subs becoming available in 1936. Put differently, the Turks did time their move correctly. But the allies had sufficient force to be able to fight two battles at the same time. With the Italians out of the picture for at least the next few months any similar attempt will need to wait...2) There is now no Axis naval presence capable of operating in the central Aegean now that could reinforce/resupply the paratroopers and as a result any mass drop on the island would be doomed to failure. The time for co-operation to break Smyrna would have been before March 30th ITTL. Now the Turkish navy is decisively outclassed by the Greek/British forces in the region and even a major push by axis airforces would be unlikely to have the same success as Crete because the Greek navy would be willing to take losses far in excess of OTL naval forces defending Crete.
Here lies a much more basic issue with German strategy. If your strategy is based on assuming the Soviets will be broken and forced behind the Urals before the new year, then actions that would look stupid in the expectation of a long war make sense. Like starting said war in the first place while still fighting the west. Which sums up the most common failure mode of Prussian/German strategic thinking, 1941 is just the most glaring example of it.As for Turkish troops being available for the Eastern Front I will just say that per German planning OTL and I assume ITTL Turkish troops are not necessary because the Soviets are going to be broken by the winter
Two miles a day may be too high on average but yes the British are certainly extending the railroad west. It's part of their way of war after all...I would like to make a post on the situation at North Africa.
First of all logistics. From the start of the war, the British were extending the narrow gauge railroad leading to Mersa Matruh. Before the onset of Compass, the railhead reached Qasaba. In TTL there is no interruption of the Sonnenblume and loss of Cyrenaica. To be honest, the progress of railroad building depends on how soon the British will involve the New Zealander contruction units and allocate rails. The rails do exist (Raj) and the construction troops are in the theatre. The New Zealanders managed to work at a superb rate of 2 miles per day.
They had ~400 aircraft in the Balkans and the time of Casibile and roughly similar numbers now, unfortunately detailed data for the whole RA and its casualties between April 41 and late 42 are not readily available but certainly having one more active front in the Balkans hardly helps. On the reverse the allies will also have to divert air forces against Turkey. On the Axis side helping the Bulgarians and Turks produce as many aircraft as possible locally would make absolute sense... and is questionable it will happen. If the Bulgarians and the Turks are building aircraft locally how are we going to sell them our own? Although a healthier Goering may have fun side effects here given his control of the Skoda works...- Illustrious has been damaged. I presume that as in OTL her Swordfish squadron is in Malta further demonstrating its usefulness.
- Regia Aeronautica has bled much worse in the Balkans compared to OTL. They still have an open front over european Greece so they can invest fewer resources in Sicily and Libya compared to OTL.
- With southern Greece and Cyrenaica secure, Cunningham has a corridor safe from air attacks to project power in the relatively open central Mediterranean. Nothing can stop him popping once a fortnight to Sirte and hurling thousands of tonnes of high explosives over the area. With enough minesweepers he can try to bombard Tripoli again.
- The British may have a lot a fair number of tanks between Sirte and El Agheila but they haven't lost the 2nd Armoured and 3rd Indian Motor Brigade as in OTL. Destroyed units are always more difficult to reconstruct and need more resources. Furthermore, they haven't lost their supply dumps in Cyrenaica along with their airfields and shops were damaged aircraft and tanks were being repaired.
I would uhm question the British purchasing commission not acting stupid here given their track record with the export of fighter aircraft to Greece in OTL. Though here the Greeks can pull rather more strings and raise much more of a stink in the British establishment...In OTL the delivered old american artillery was basically unused. It was either used for Home Defence or for training. So, I doubt the British would raise an issue about it. It doesn't even need precious shipping to be convoyed from the Atlantic: straight from California or the Panama Canal. The Americans have more than enough shipping in that part of the world or Dragoumis can sent a few greek merchantmen.
I agree that on average 2 miles per day sustained over many months might be too high. However, 1,5 miles seem very manageable and perhaps a bit more.Two miles a day may be too high on average but yes the British are certainly extending the railroad west. It's part of their way of war after all...
Exactly! In TTL Greece is a much more valuable ally to Britain and one that has proven its worth already in the Battle of Thermopylae. At this point, Dragoumis will have an open line with Churchill and Winston will be very enthousiastic about a victory of such symbolic importance.I would uhm question the British purchasing commission not acting stupid here given their track record with the export of fighter aircraft to Greece in OTL. Though here the Greeks can pull rather more strings and raise much more of a stink in the British establishment...
I just think that in general TTL Greece would be treated better then otl due to them surviving and having competent people leading them. Greece had one of the biggest navies in the region and Britain can't lose that, which means they should be much more invested as any axis attack now would have a bigger response than otl too.Exactly! In TTL Greece is a much more valuable ally to Britain and one that has proven its worth already in the Battle of Thermopylae. At this point, Dragoumis will have an open line with Churchill and Winston will be very enthousiastic
That is true. By the same token TTL the British and French have a need to be expanding the Syrian railroads in view of an active front against Turkey which was not present in OTL, to the same extend at least.Moreover, they can throw more human resources at the construction. The vast majority of construction was done by 2 NZ railroad costruction companies and Palestinian labour. Now, what if they add an Australian Construction Company as well at the mix? They had experience with building and maintaining roads over deserts and rough terrain.
Churchill will be supportive of Greece. So will David Lloyd George who is somewhat more influential TTL. Further down the chain not everyone was as farsighted as seen time and again. Which will be fun to behold on an obvious likely point of friction between Greece and Britain, namely Cyprus. Churchill was the one to propose in 1913 that Britain should offer to Greece the island in exchange for an alliance correctly judging both the unionist sentiment within Cyprus and the effect it would have in effectively securing Greece as an adjunct to the Commonwealth afterwards. He was again favourable to the idea in 1940-41. The Colonial Office and the Joint Chiefs on the other hand...So as I see it, Churchill is Greece's greatest ally in Westminster. Especially after Barbarossa, when the strategic importance of Greece and the Straits skyrockets. The british establishment knew their history and understood the importance of keeping the USSR in the war, the same high strategy their ancestors had against Louis XIV and Napoleon.
75mm as seen hereBy the way, I did not know that in addition to the 30 fighters, the first shipment of Lend-Lease included 50 artillery pieces. @Lascaris do you know what kind of artillery was it? I expect it to have been 75mm, either the american converted 18pdr or the french kind.
I quite agree! Simply, the importance of TTL Greece is quite higher than in OTL.I just think that in general TTL Greece would be treated better then otl due to them surviving and having competent people leading them.
Country | Total casualties |
---|---|
German | 37,435 |
Italian | 60,191 |
Bulgarian | 46,577 |
Turkish | 97,288 |
Hungarian | 3,335 |
Greek | 208,773 |
Yugoslav | 41,283 |
British | 21,765 |
French | 7,642 |
Polish | 18,033 |
Nationality | Thessaly | Epirus | Ionia | Caucasus | Iraq | Syria | Occupation |
Greek | 10 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
British | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
French | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Polish | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Serb | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Soviet | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
German | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Italian | 15 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
Turkish | 0 | 0 | 15 | 11 | 2 | 8 | 2 |
Bulgarian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
Croatian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Hungarian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Casualties in military terms are the number of soldiers taken out of action i.e deaths, injuries missing and prisoners of war.Well in Iraq and Syria the Axis have an advantage greater than 2-1 , not reflecting equipment though, and have open desert to walk across. A possible Syrian revolt is a very obvious threat so maybe the French promise freedom after the war to placate the Syrians? They could be a useful manpower addition really although the tensions since the Syrian revolt could through a wrench on things.
I wonder If the railroad in Cyrenaica will reach the front before the Germans break it. Then in could be used as a retreating road to safely move the supplies to safety so they don't fall to German hands and of course move troops faster to establish new defense lines.
Seeing those casualties I hope it counts POWs and wounded out of action soldiers cause those are some terrifying numbers for Greece.