The Union of Soviet Sovereign Republics, 1991-96

OTL the USSR was in a state of pretty much complete collapse by the summer of 1991. All the republics had declared "sovereignty", the Baltic States were out the door, and nobody was paying much attention to the central government in Moscow any more.

As we all know, Gorbachev made one desperate last-ditch effort to save something from the wreckage: a treaty of union, which would join some of the republics in a loose confederation. The New Union Treaty would create a "Union of Soviet Sovereign Republics" which would be unique in the world -- a supernational confederation of sovereign states. The member states would be full nations, with seats in the UN and complete control over internal affairs, but there would be one economic space, a common currency and a unified defense force. In theory, it would be something like today's EU.

In practice, it was almost impossible. The republics were reluctant, seeing little benefit from watering down their new sovereignty. Russia, in particular, was restive -- Boris Yeltsin was already veering towards economic liberalism and Russian nationalism, and he saw no point in keeping a decrepit Soviet center looking over his shoulder. And Ukraine didn't even join the Treaty, which made it almost certain of failure. Just to get Russia, Belorussia and the Asian republics to agree, the treaty language had to be watered down and weasel-worded to the point where it would have been almost impossible to administer.

In any event, it was never tried. The USSR had become a man dying of sickness to whom medicine was poison. Kremlin hardliners found the treaty unacceptable; the day before it was to be signed, they staged a coup. The coup lasted only a few days, but it completely discredited Gorbachev and caused the republics to lose what little interest they had. The USSR staggered on for four more months, formally surviving until December 1991, but it had effectively ceased to exist within a week or two after the August coup.

So, POD: make the New Union Treaty happen.

I think this needs two things. One, Gorbachev has to move faster. The USSR decayed very fast -- almost explosively. OTL the first draft of the treaty was submitted to the Supreme Soviet in November 1990, but it was unacceptable; it was really just a weakened Soviet Union, and didn't acknowledge full sovereignty in the republics. Precious weeks were lost debating it, and an acceptable draft wasn't produced until March.

So, let's say that TTL, Gorbachev forces a more liberal draft through by the end of 1990. That's a stretch, because Gorbachev wasn't convinced of the confederal arrangement until far into 1991 -- he saw it as just a way station on the road to complete breakup. But let's say he has a glimpse of the future, and decides that a crust of bread is better than no loaf at
all.

Two, Ukraine has to be brought on board. I'm going to handwave that. [handwave] Kravchuk was a strange dude, and Ukrainian internal politics were pretty weird at this time (not that they're what you'd call straightforward today), so let's just say it happens.

So with a stretch and a handwave and a furious bound forwards, we have a Union Treaty presented to the republics in January and approved by May.

Ta daa! The Union of Soviet Sovereign Republics is born. It's a supernational federation of nine sovereign states: the old Soviet Union minus the Baltic States, Moldova, Armenia and Georgia. It has a common currency -- still the ruble -- and no internal barriers to trade. The individual states have their own armies, but there's also a USSR military (which theoretically controls the strategic nuclear force, though in practice I think this will be firmly under Russia).

There's a Supreme Court which sits in Moscow. In theory there is a common foreign policy; in practice, not so much.

It's rickety as hell, and doesn't work very well. But I could see this surviving in a metastable sort of way for a few years, until economic crises and irresistable nationalism tore it apart.

Thoughts?


Doug M.
 
It sounds good and it will have some effects on the world stage, however I am not sure what those effects will be.
 
It sounds good and it will have some effects on the world stage, however I am not sure what those effects will be.

Maybe all these countries would recover faster economically from the fall of the old Union because economical ties are not severed.

Also they have the common military force and cannot enter other military alliances (read NATO) without agreement from other participants.
 
I'm not sure it would have much of a real impact: it doesn't create an equal association, but binds to Russia lots of places Russian would like to conquer. It doesn't solve or address the status of the Old Warsaw Pact, which would likely have had the wave of "color" revolutions, undermining USSR prestige.

Does this USSR practice state socialism/communism or does Gorbachev completely open Russia to capitalism and democracy? Given your name, it sounds like the answer is yes. If so, it's probably still a non-starter, unless glastnost and perestroika come to resemble a fully-fledged economic opening a la China (at least on the economic side). If the answer is no, why wouldn't the military attempt a coup and thus catapult Yeltsin to prominence and sound the deathnell of the USSR?

In the early years of the Russian Federation, Yeltsin experimented with giving the regions as much autonomy as they liked, sparking fears of a Balkanization of much of Russia (hence, Chechnya). Perhaps the USSR provides a way for these regions to become indepedent, but not completely undermine the power of the Russian/USSR state aparatus. If so, it may thereby become a more potent international body, since it would be less the tool of Russia, making countries like the Ukraine less uneasy about remaining a part of the USSR.

Overall, I can't see your USSR being too terribly different in function from OTL Commonwealth of Independent States.
 
4 questions:

1) Since Azerbaijan stayed in the union but Armenia didn't, what does this mean for the Nagorno-Karabakh War?

2) In connection to the question above, is there a mutual defense clause in the treaty?

3) Also in connection with question 1), have you considered the possibility of Elcibay or some other pro-Western nationalist coming to power in Baku and taking Azerbaijan out of the union, possibly under the pretext of a lack of military support? This could be the catalyst of the USSR's break-up.

4) How will the union react to the inevitable requests from some of the autonomous republics to be raised to full membership?

Wikipedia mentions that the scheme was renamed the "Union of Sovereign States" in later stages. I recall Britannica mentioning a "Union of Sovereign Republics" or something like that in connection with Gorbachev, so this is probably accurate.
 
4 questions:

1) Since Azerbaijan stayed in the union but Armenia didn't, what does this mean for the Nagorno-Karabakh War?

That's a big one. I think this forces Russia to tip more towards Azerbaijan, and away from Armenia.

OTL, the Karabakh war was a seesaw thing, but Armenia mostly had the upper hand. However, there was a window of opportunity in 1992 when Azerbaijan might have overrun the territory. Of course, this by itself might not have ended the war... but TTL, I think Azerbaijan's chances are better; they may be able to get military control of Karabakh, and then appeal to the USR for a ceasefire.

2) In connection to the question above, is there a mutual defense clause in the treaty?

Yes. But it's going to be liberally interpreted, especially since each nation controls its own military.

3) Also in connection with question 1), have you considered the possibility of Elcibay or some other pro-Western nationalist coming to power in Baku and taking Azerbaijan out of the union, possibly under the pretext of a lack of military support? This could be the catalyst of the USSR's break-up.

As I think about it, the half-life of the USR is likely to be around five years. There are several possible breaking points; Karabakh, Chechnya, economic crisis... it's going to be hard for it to last the decade.

4) How will the union react to the inevitable requests from some of the autonomous republics to be raised to full membership?

Badly. This is mostly a Russian problem, but Azerbaijan and Kyrgyzstan also have restive minorities in autonomous oblasts, and most of the 'stans will be run by conservative ex-Party bosses. So, there will be a consensus against allowing this.

I do think we get a Chechen war, and this may contribute to the disintegration of the USR in the mid '90s.


Doug M.
 
So what happens to the authority of the central government in this scenario, for the few years that it holds together? OTL, my impression was the authority of the central government and the Communist party essentially collapsed after the coup attempt, allowing Yeltsin's Congress to take over as the government for Russia. Here, the central government is still theoretically the "highest" level of the government, above Yeltsin's Russian republic government: how bad do the turf wars get between the Russian Congress and whatever is left of the Congress of Soviets?

How long does Gorbachev maintain any real authority in Russia proper, much less in the other republics? How does the Communist government apparatus separate from (or merge with) Yeltsin's Russian government? Does Gorbachev one day simply find that nobody is returning his phone calls, and does this happen before the Final Crisis hits?

The economy - will the continued economic unity of the remaining republics soften the economic crunch, or will things be even worse than OTL as quarrels between the different republics and political turf wars in Russia make it impossible to agree on a serious course of economic reform, even the fairly disastrous shock-therapy effort of OTL? Do we see conflicting and perhaps mutually destructive local efforts?

After said Final Crisis, does the Union still have a ghostly after-life, say as a loose union of Russia, Belorus, and, I dunno, Kazakhistan?

And, whatever becomes of Transnistria in this scenario? :)

Bruce
 
Top