Elaborate Title Name: SR Question Thread
In the AH business, we talk about pulling a Meiji quite often, about what if certain nations could have somehow advanced almost miraculously to becoming European or near-European technologically/economically/militarily advanced. But what about another model for historically colonized nations to survive and flourish? While I'm no longer much of a fan of his, Orson Scott Card brought it up quite interestingly in his Shadow trilogy, to wit:
So is it a possible alternate model for discussing how countries could have done better than in OTL?
In the AH business, we talk about pulling a Meiji quite often, about what if certain nations could have somehow advanced almost miraculously to becoming European or near-European technologically/economically/militarily advanced. But what about another model for historically colonized nations to survive and flourish? While I'm no longer much of a fan of his, Orson Scott Card brought it up quite interestingly in his Shadow trilogy, to wit:
It is hard to imagine a nation that has been more lucky in the quality of its leaders as Thailand and its predecessor kingdoms, which managed to survive invasions from every direction and European and Japanese ambitions in Southeast Asia, all the while maintaining its own national character and remaining, more than many kingdoms and oligarchies, responsive to the needs of the Thai people.
'I got fascinated with Thailand. A nation of survivors. The ancient Tai people managed to take over vast reaches of the Cambodian Empire and spread throughout southeast Asia, all without anybody noticing. They were conquered by Burma & emerged stronger than ever. When other countries were falling under European domination, Thailand managed to expand its borders for a surprisingly long time, & even when it lost Cambodia & Laos, it held its core... the Thai are not easily conquered, and, once conquered, not easily ruled.
So is it a possible alternate model for discussing how countries could have done better than in OTL?