Kokoda Day

How could us in Australia have commemorated the Kokoda campaign of Aug-Sept 1942 as a national holiday in the same way as we do ANZAC Day (25th April) today ? WI there'd been less acrimony and controversy in the aftermath of the Australian militiamen's fighting retreat (by the 39th (Vic) and 53rd (NSW) bns from Iorobaiwa), and the consequent allegations by MacArthur and Blamey that they were cowards ? How would Australia develop with 2 such national holidays ?

BTW, this idea comes from James Bradley's erroneous observation in his article @The Boys who Saved Australia@ in MORE WHAT-IF, that we actually do celebrate Kokoda Day as a national holiday today.
 
How can you commemorate a national holiday more than having a day off from work and getting stone drunk? Here in the US a holiday isn't a holiday with a great amount of one-day or 36-hour sales at major department stores. Usually by the fourth year of a holiday's observance everyone forgets what the whole thing is for - aside from those that hold parades.
 
Well, for starters, the federal government could declare such a day a public holiday. But I don't see them even discussing the idea let alone getting ready to declare one.
 
The actual date could be the 26th September, the day that the Japanese were ordered back from Imita Ridge, just south of Ioribiawa, their first retreat of the war. This was actually their first defeat. A national day or rememberance would be appropriate here, but it will never happen. Firstly, Anzac Day holds the national mythology, not Kokoda. Secondly, the New Guinea campaign was a side show, like Gallipoli, but unlike Gallippoli, Kokoda has to contend with how the Americans won the war in the Pacific.

After showing how the Japanese can be defeated, the Australian troops were sidelined by MacArthur, he distrusted any army that did not have the death penalty at the core if its military justice system, he also disliked the lack of formalty and generally egalitarian nature of the Australian troops, believing it to be unprofessional.

MacArthur also had a press corps that was greater in number than the Australian General Staff, how could any word of such a sideshow as Kokoda, which was in his view of no real importance be given any credence anywhere other than in Australia? (It is interesting to note that Chester Nimmitz had an entire press corps of 2, and he directed the Island hopping of the Marines that led to the ultimate defeat of japan, but it was MacArthur who accepted the Japanese surrender on the Missouri. Unbelievable, but true. To be fair though, MacArthur's real accomplishments were formidable, but nowhere near the mythological deeds his press corps made them out to be )

Under those circumtances, with a government that was enarmoured of MacArthur's myths, Kokoda was to be ignored for the achievement it was, not lauded for what it could have been, if MacArthur had been in charge, not Blamey.

BTW, the controversy of the time, Blamey calling the troops cowards and sacking Rowell was more about appeasing MacArthur's ego than anything else. MacArthur dismissed Australian reports from Kokoda and refused to aid the Australian troops believing that the main assualt on Port Moresby was coming from sea borne landings. Worse still, from MacArthur's view, the US Marines were landing on Guadalcanal, thus upstaging anything that MacArthur was doing. Consequently, for the media of the day, the main action was with the US Marines on Guadalcanal between August 1942 to February 1943 not Australian troops in New Guinea in September 1942. MacArthur certainly did not want to be seen as being behind the action, so it was not until the joint assault on Buna and Gona that the American troops were really into the action, too late for MacArthur to gain too much mileage from it.

Anyway, all of that is why Australia will never celebrate a Kokoda Day, not because it was a small achievement, but because it had no hysterically positive press coverage like Gallipoli. It had no CW Bean to write it up as myth either.
 
Damien Parer ?

Thx for your replies, my fellow Aussies, which are very appreciated- but what about Damien Parer and his presence as official photgrapher during the Kokoda campaign ?
 
Melvin Loh said:
Thx for your replies, my fellow Aussies, which are very appreciated- but what about Damien Parer and his presence as official photgrapher during the Kokoda campaign ?


Well that's half of Parer's problem - he was a camera man. The pictures told the story. Bean, on the other hand, could create a history, not based upon the realism that photos & film produce, but one where the written word was central. Thus a mythology, based upon the events, could be easily created & capture the public's imagination.

And this is an important aspect. Prior to WW1 Australia didn't really have much of a mythology of it's own. Come WW1, though, & Australians could tell stories equal to the epics of ancient Greece. The story of Anzac Cove thus is Australia's equivalent to any tragic heroic epic struggle of freedom verse tyranny from the ancient world. Come WW2, however, & the epic Australian myths had already been well established. Maybe in another 50 years, Kokoda will rank equally with tales of Anzac Cove or the Somme.
 
Top