WW2 after a Central Powers victory in WW1

Discussion in 'Alternate History Discussion: After 1900' started by Rekjavik, Oct 12, 2007.

  1. Rekjavik The 17th Colossus

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2007
    Location:
    Jötunheimr
    There is a list of what I would like to know. Assuming that the Central Powers defeat the Entente in World War 1:

    · What alliances will be involved?
    · What tactics and strategies would be used by the opposing sides?
    · Who would win?
    The reason for this is because at first I thought that a fascist France and Britain, along with Russia, would fight against Germany and its allies. Then I read that France would be too weak for a third round against the Germans, and that only Russia was capable of rebuilding itself and attacking Germany. Then I read of a third option, a communist France and Britain would re-launch hostilities against the Germans.
    There are just so many now that I have lost track. Do help straighten things out.

    P.S: Mentioning possible battles of this World War 2 would is also welcome, but as this is AH and thinking of alternate battles in an alternate war is incredibly difficult, you can drop that one.
     
  2. BrotherToAll Student of G.K. Chesterton

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    In what year do the CP powers claim victory? Because that can make a big
    difference in how things play out.
     
  3. Gaius Julius Caesar Veni, vidi, vici

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Location:
    The Limbo
    well, if Germany won the first world war, who sais there would be a world war two in europe? maybe just war in asia...
     
  4. Rekjavik The 17th Colossus

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2007
    Location:
    Jötunheimr
    For the purpose of this TL let’s say the Germans win WW1 in 1918, after a more successful 1917 offensive against the French, thus knocking them out. Russia will fall as in OTL. Italy fallows France soon after its defeat in 1917. Since there was no real way for Germany to crush Britain without risking being strangled because of the blockade, create a ceasefire in late 1918.
     
  5. Riain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    I doubt there would be anyone strong enough to challenge Germany directly. With a German victory would Britain keep its treaty with Japan, and perhaps end up in conflict with the US?
     
  6. Michael B Doomfarer

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2005
    Location:
    Cair Paravel on the shores of the Shining Sea
    Agree with that.

    Moreover, Germany and the USA will be competing to for world leadership and that it is going to lead to some form of clash. The Americans are going to need a bridgehead in Europe and that is going to have to be France or Russia. I would go for France as the Americans were friendly with them at the time, but White Russia would also be attractive with US industrialist pouring into build factories.

    I
     
  7. Gaius Julius Caesar Veni, vidi, vici

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Location:
    The Limbo
    What happens to the Austrian Empire? If that doesn't fall apart then maybe the Impirialist ambitions of Germany and Austria could result in a conflict between those two, or is that to farfetched?:confused:
     
  8. Homer Comicbookman

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    I fully agree with the potential competition between the German Empire and the US. I do not fully agree, however, with your choice of bridgeheads, although that, of course, depends on how Germany wins.

    The German war goals were to end the French threat once and for all - as was the French goal to end the German threat. Given that Germany knocks France out, I'd bet on even harsher peace terms for the French than those for Germany, since Britain probably wouldn't be defeated by the Germans but rather took an armistice on the status quo. Thus France would be occupied in large parts, Calais would eb German, France would loose most of its colonies, pay a hard tribute, and would be forced into an economic alliance under the control of the Germans. France would probably have no chance to act as a bridgehead for the Americans.

    Considering Russia, the Germans would probably crush the Reds, thus I'm assuming a White Russia, which would probably be a theater of economic competition between the two rivals Germany and USA. It may become an American bridgehead - although I'd assume that the Germans wouldn't hesitate to use preemptive force in such a case.

    The most probable bridgehead would be Britain: The Germans might win WWI, yet they'd never defeat Britain at that time. Thus Britain survives as a great power and the natural rival to Germany. I'd bet on a rivalry between Britain and the US on one side and Germany and its "continental block" on the other side, Russia being between them both.
     
  9. tallwingedgoat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    A CP victory will bring several difficult to resolve problems.

    Probably the biggest is Eastern Europe. The Austro-Hungarian Empire will fall apart and Germany will try to annex the German parts like Austria and probably parts of Czechoslovakia. They will also want Solvenia to get a port in the Med. The Italians will be very unhappy. It will be a "beat them or join them" situation. They will either ally themselves to Germany or form alliances with France and Britain. Either way the Med will become contested waters. Germany and Russia will probably at some point fight over Poland as well.
     
  10. Michael B Doomfarer

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2005
    Location:
    Cair Paravel on the shores of the Shining Sea
    I would disagree with bridgehead point. Imperial Japan's expansion into China and the way they were going about it was eventually going to get up US noses and lead to the sort of embargo that occurred on OTL. In reply, Pearl Harbor was exactly the sort of response one might expect.

    Given that the Anglo-Japanese alliance would still be intact because the German victory in WW1, the USA is not going to be looking to use an ally of an enemy as a bridgehead against a third power.

    Of course a policy shift from an Anglo-Japanese alliance to an Anglo-US would permit a bridgehead. However, why would Britain wish to switch from an alliance of which she is the senior partner to one where she is an equal and which the alliance achieves the same goal, namely containment of the German Highs Fleet?
     
  11. Empror Mike Emperor of the Obscene

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2007
    Germany, Austria Hungary, Turkish Republic, Bulgaria, Italy, East European pro-German states

    vs.

    Britain, the USA, Japan, France, USSR, maybe Balkan states


    I'll assume no German blitzkrieg. Other than that, everythings the same depending on the war's time period.


    The Germans, again.
     
  12. Tocomocho My other car is a steam tank.

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2006
    Why would Turkey go Republican? The Ottoman Empire lasted more years than the Russian, Austro-Hungarian and German ones in OTL. It was abolished in 1922, due to the absurd Treaty of Sevres. If it was the only one of the four empires mentioned that survived a defeat in the Great War, how in hell would it fall after a stunning victory?
     
  13. Datner Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2007
    That would be puppet regimes. Reliance on their comittment to German cause would be based on weak foundations. Polish and Ukrainian forces likely to desert to Russia if Mitteleuropa plan is put forward.
     
  14. BrotherToAll Student of G.K. Chesterton

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    I think not with the full wieght of American industry against them as well as the Russians occupied with the Japanese armed with American weapons in the East (who is not to say America and Japan fought in the 30's so lets add American backed Korean and Chinese troops in the place of Japanese) and the Germans and their weak and disloyal vassle states and allies battling the full force of Anglo-American alliance I just dont see Germany winning also dont you think the various non-German ehtnic groups will rebel and rise up against the Germans? I for one can actualy see Polish and other Slavic troops switching sides my self because no self respecting Slav would ever truly accept the oppresive yoke of the Germans.
     
  15. Empror Mike Emperor of the Obscene

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2007
    It was steadily declining anyway. I dont think the Ottomans had any real chance of holding it together. The only reason the Ottomans held control over certain regions was because there was no nationalist sentiment (or majority group to sense it) in any other region. The best chance for the empire's maintainence is to refuel Turkish nationalism by founding a republic. Maybe then they do have a chance.

    I honestly dont believe anyone seriously considered the racist/colonialist parts of the Mitteleuropa plan. The Germans rather wanted a European Union sort of thing, dominated by Germany who would simply not offer any economic protection for the weaker members.

    As opposed to that of the Russians?
    When German troops marched through Poland, they were cheered and gladly welcomed. Germany was fairly egalitarian (racially), if compared to other European nations at the time. Russia was opressive, primitive, and brutal.
    As said before, I think the Germans and Slavs could make good allies; the Second Reich wasn't an evil Nazi empire bent on world domination. The east European republics would have been 3/4 independent.
     
  16. Datner Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2007
    Before the war German was more racist and discriminatory towards Poles then Russia.
    European Union is based on partnership and protection of minorities, German Empire wanted economic hegemony and German minority as elite class residing over second class citizens.

    Where did you read that ? All relations I read about the event, speak that occupation by Germans was resented due to widescale plunder and forced labour implemented by German Ober Ost, also writers speak about a very arrogant attitude of officals regarding locals. In history of WW1 there was no pro-German faction among Poles, the largest was Endecja pro-Russian(unite all Polish lands) and pro-Austrian(Congress Poland and Galicia as third Kingdom in AH). Germans had nothing to offer, and wanted to gain much from Poland.

    Germans were germanising regions like Wielkopolska or Pomerania, and also planning to expell milions of Poles from annexed regions. This wouldn't make a good ground for any alliance.

    Except:
    German princes as heads of state
    Industry in German hands
    Military in German hand
    Transport network in German hands
    Citizens expelled to make room for German settlers.

    Only culture and teaching would be granted some autonomy but even that was already being limited during short German rule in Poland 1916-1918.
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2007
  17. BrotherToAll Student of G.K. Chesterton

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Though there might not actually be a second war as we know it I think America would fight a war with Japan in the mid 30's the Germans start to loose their grip on what they have taken control of as various ethnic groups fight insurgent wars against their German run governments Russia explodes into another (American supported rebels?) civil war and from there on it all goes down hill for Germany from there. So instead of a major war it could be a number of smaller conflicts lead to eventual melt down of the German empire.
     
  18. Riain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    The biggest problem for this sort of scenario is that what happened IOTL can't be projected ITTL because the fundamental dynamics of world power will be radically different. It's safe to say that Germany will be undoubtably the most, or second most (depending on the actions of the US, with it's small standing army) powerful country in the world. German political actions in the conquered territory will change in over the years, as it adjusts to the reality of hegemony. Some people will resent the new regime, but others will benefit; there will be increased infrastructure and German governence will be miles ahead of Russia or AH, trains will run on time, the mail will be reliable and people will notice and appreciate the difference. The upshot is that Britain, France and Russia will have to look at their performance and lift their game, but I doubt this will be enough to give them the power to challenge Germany.
     
  19. BrotherToAll Student of G.K. Chesterton

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    So ITTL the only country capable of challenging Germany is the US?
     
  20. Riain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    No, certainly not. Russia with 15-20 years peace would become a serious rival to Germany. A strong strategic bond between Britian and France, a customs union between them and their empires and very close military bonds would also be a serious rival to Germany. However they would be at best equals, or more probably close inferiors. Its is only the US which would have a comfortable margin of industrial power over Germany. I doubt that any of these power blocs would lightly risk war with another.