That seems the best outcome, but would anyone consider it?That, or there is an independent Filipino state, backed up by U.S. military force.
I assume securing US trade in Asia,and other economic reasonsThat seems the best outcome, but would anyone consider it?
Was there any reason behind the annexation beyond 'uplift the savages'?
That seems the best outcome, but would anyone consider it?
Was there any reason behind the annexation beyond 'uplift the savages'?
That seems the best outcome, but would anyone consider it?
Was there any reason behind the annexation beyond 'uplift the savages'?
You give far too much moral credit to colonial regimes in assuming that "uplifting savages" ever served as a motivation.
Except that when you start :"uplifting savages", you often end up "uplifting" them by hanging them by the neck.Well, uplifting savages was definately a part of colonialism. But, I suppose in the end most of those types would have been classified as useful idiots by the state, if such terminology and mechanistic modes of thought weren't so patently out of time and place. In period parlance, they were mostly Christian Missionaries, or Liberals or Conservatives who were actually more able and willing to commit to the demands of their ideology than most of their counterparts.
Ensure stronger trade links in Asia, secure coaling stations for the Navy for operations in the region, etc...