Chapter 4 - Muhlenberg's Fateful Decision
Chapter 4
The vote on April 29, 1796 stood at 49 to 49. Madison’s speech had managed to convince some Federalists to oppose the treaty, claiming that a more-competent negotiator could come up with a better treaty in the next administration. These Federalists were weary of the political violence erupting across the country and so, kowtowing to Madison’s pressure and public sentiment, voted “Nay” on the bill.
The final person to vote was Frederick Muhlenberg, who sat in a cold sweat in the House chambers. A Democratic-Republican, he had previously been a key participant in anti-Jay Treaty protests. Muhlenberg had even gone so far as to burn a copy of the treaty on the doorstep of the British ambassador. Nevertheless, he was conflicted. On the one hand, his partisan cohorts demanded he vote against funding the treaty. Madison’s speech and Madison’s pressure had proven too strong to ignore for the rest of the party faithful, but yet Muhlenberg resisted. Now worried about that political violence, especially after an impassioned speech by sickly Federalist Fisher Ames of Massachusetts which laid that violence as well as the merits of the treaty bare, Muhlenberg sat stewing.
Do I vote the party line? he thought. After all, this is a bad treaty, one which will doom the country to become Britain’s lackey once again. On the other hand though, does the House really have a say in this treaty? Won’t our voting it down just stoke more political violence?
Suddenly he heard the speaker’s aide call out again from in front of the podium: “Congressman Frederick Muhlenberg from Pennsylvania, what say you?”
Slowly, Muhlenberg rose from his seat. In another time, another place, he would make a different calculus. One that would lead to the end of his political career and to his brother-in-law stabbing him in defiance of his vote. But here, in this time, in this place, his conscience was clear: “Nay!”
“Mr. Muhlenberg votes nay. The vote stands at 49 to 50. The nays have it.”
And somewhere outside the hall, a lonely butterfly flapped its wings, oblivious to the constitutional crisis about to unfold.
The vote on April 29, 1796 stood at 49 to 49. Madison’s speech had managed to convince some Federalists to oppose the treaty, claiming that a more-competent negotiator could come up with a better treaty in the next administration. These Federalists were weary of the political violence erupting across the country and so, kowtowing to Madison’s pressure and public sentiment, voted “Nay” on the bill.
The final person to vote was Frederick Muhlenberg, who sat in a cold sweat in the House chambers. A Democratic-Republican, he had previously been a key participant in anti-Jay Treaty protests. Muhlenberg had even gone so far as to burn a copy of the treaty on the doorstep of the British ambassador. Nevertheless, he was conflicted. On the one hand, his partisan cohorts demanded he vote against funding the treaty. Madison’s speech and Madison’s pressure had proven too strong to ignore for the rest of the party faithful, but yet Muhlenberg resisted. Now worried about that political violence, especially after an impassioned speech by sickly Federalist Fisher Ames of Massachusetts which laid that violence as well as the merits of the treaty bare, Muhlenberg sat stewing.
Do I vote the party line? he thought. After all, this is a bad treaty, one which will doom the country to become Britain’s lackey once again. On the other hand though, does the House really have a say in this treaty? Won’t our voting it down just stoke more political violence?
Suddenly he heard the speaker’s aide call out again from in front of the podium: “Congressman Frederick Muhlenberg from Pennsylvania, what say you?”
Slowly, Muhlenberg rose from his seat. In another time, another place, he would make a different calculus. One that would lead to the end of his political career and to his brother-in-law stabbing him in defiance of his vote. But here, in this time, in this place, his conscience was clear: “Nay!”
“Mr. Muhlenberg votes nay. The vote stands at 49 to 50. The nays have it.”
And somewhere outside the hall, a lonely butterfly flapped its wings, oblivious to the constitutional crisis about to unfold.
Last edited: