The Axis effectively use Bioweapons on the US

RanulfC

Lost Freeway said:
Maybe you could offer a substantive explanation of the flaws in this scenario instead of simply being dismissive.
Click to expand...

See above the scenario is fatally flawed as given. Crops, animals, people, choose ONE and then figure out how to expand beyond a small target area.

How do the allies react? If the Japanese the entire island chain is bombed into rubble and the "Operation Vegetarian" is engaged until the population is reduced significantly and more "pliable" into a non-aggressive nation. Casualties and or damage is high enough then repeat as needed till the population is reduced to a few thousand people who are easily rounded up and "done away with" and no one says "boo" about it till 40 years later. (They were already on the US's "s***-list for Pearl Harbor)

Germany? They get reduced to a "peaceful and pastoral people with no inclination or desire to practice war EVER again" (a much discussed option before we decided we 'needed' them to fight the Soviets) by ANY means necessary. (Planed methods were starvation, disease, and "suppression" by occupying allied forces) Higher damage or casualties and the "occupying" nations become new colonists in a strangely "depopulated" land.

See the "problem" here? It's the definition of a 'no-win' scenario for the Axis from the start. And THAT "assumes" the effects are limited and localized. If the effects are 'greater' so will be the retaliation. (Imagine the "outrage" over 9/11 with an OBVIOUS target/nation for nations that are already at full war production and have NO issues with applying their own "final" solution to the problem)

Present a credible "scenario" and we'll discuss it.

Randy
 

jmc247

RanulfC said:
See above the scenario is fatally flawed as given. Crops, animals, people, choose ONE and then figure out how to expand beyond a small target area.

How do the allies react? If the Japanese the entire island chain is bombed into rubble and the "Operation Vegetarian" is engaged until the population is reduced significantly and more "pliable" into a non-aggressive nation. Casualties and or damage is high enough then repeat as needed till the population is reduced to a few thousand people who are easily rounded up and "done away with" and no one says "boo" about it till 40 years later. (They were already on the US's "s***-list for Pearl Harbor)

Germany? They get reduced to a "peaceful and pastoral people with no inclination or desire to practice war EVER again" (a much discussed option before we decided we 'needed' them to fight the Soviets) by ANY means necessary. (Planed methods were starvation, disease, and "suppression" by occupying allied forces) Higher damage or casualties and the "occupying" nations become new colonists in a strangely "depopulated" land.

See the "problem" here? It's the definition of a 'no-win' scenario for the Axis from the start. And THAT "assumes" the effects are limited and localized. If the effects are 'greater' so will be the retaliation. (Imagine the "outrage" over 9/11 with an OBVIOUS target/nation for nations that are already at full war production and have NO issues with applying their own "final" solution to the problem)

Present a credible "scenario" and we'll discuss it.

Randy
Click to expand...

The pastoral state plan was a plan that the Soviets had their mole Dexter White push on the Treasury Secretary so that the Germans wouldn't surrender in the field to the Western Allies. Also, to make the WAllies look bad after the war and make Western Germany ripe for a pro-Soviet revolution.

If Germany uses gas much less bio weapons there won't be a German population left in Central Europe. Hitler didn't care about that if Germany lost, but his view was the world was a constant race war and the strong should destroy the weak so Germany being devastated by the Soviets was something he felt they deserved and was just given his own racial thinking that the Slavs were the master race because they proved superior on the field of battle.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top
Top