I like what you're doing here. It's original and creative.
But this is kinda getting wanky. Are there any future crises planned?
But this is kinda getting wanky. Are there any future crises planned?
Yes, of course. We're still in the first 100 days. Things go well, before they go bad.I like what you're doing here. It's original and creative.
But this is kinda getting wanky. Are there any future crises planned?
Oh, I meant speed up the story, ya know? I think once we're out of the first 100 days, the pace will speed up and we'll start looking forward to the midterms and all that.Ah. Write at your most comfortable speed. Quality over quantity.
No, I don't think so.I bet Bob Dole will be the Republican nominee in the 1992 election.
Y'all best have more evidence that the member you just painted as a racist actually is one. The fact that he isn't a fan of this thread IS NOT such evidence.Jackson isn't elected because he was almost assassinated. He was elected because he campaigned. Ya'll racism is showing, LOL. Sad. Try again.
Yes, now we're talking. But to be clear, the campaign manager doesn't run the campaign, they "manage" it. She was chosen for the optics. Jackson and Hart truly ran the campaign in this scenario, not even the woman who they hand picked to run it.
Thank you all, I just got home from a rather long walk and will work on an update now. I appreciate all the input, especially the wrong ones.
I do apologize. I was being flippant with the word, without a doubt.Y'all best have more evidence that the member you just painted as a racist actually is one. The fact that he isn't a fan of this thread IS NOT such evidence.
You have two options. Present acceptable proof that the member actually IS a racist. Apologize, publicly, in this thread.
Either way, you have 24 hours from the next time you log on.
After that I have to get involved again. The action for accusing someone of being a racist (Nazi, etc.) is the same as being one
I hope you understand, I haven't made him into a tyrant. I'm considering how the media would portray him, and that's how the conservative members of the Congress would, similar but I feel ultimately to a lessor degree when compared to the right's reaction to President Obama. I feel I have made a strong and compelling character, and feel this will ultimately demonstrate that Jackson is a good guy and deserving of the presidency. He's been very successful thus far. I thought I was getting a reaction that the readers felt this was moving into "wank" direction. Jackson is a bad ass, and I feel in this story he feels a responsibility to correct the Reagan years.Considering that I have previously written a disgustingly biased timeline about Jackson disastrously losing the 1988 election, and that TL serves as a dark reminder of the person I used to be, I was initially overjoyed to see this TL when I was scrolling through the forum. After reading it though I'm disappointed. I was hoping for something that genuinely explored a potential Jackson presidency, and instead he's banning oil tankers, and forcing Supreme Court Justices to resign.
Jackson has his flaws but, you've made him into a cartoonish tyrant and a generic left-wing strawman who doesn't even resemble himself. Jesse Jackson deserves a better TL, where his real strengths and weaknesses are explored.
Thank you for the prompt reply.I do apologize. I was being flippant with the word, without a doubt.
I hope you understand, I haven't made him into a tyrant. I'm considering how the media would portray him, and that's how the conservative members of the Congress would, similar but I feel ultimately to a lessor degree when compared to the right's reaction to President Obama. I feel I have made a strong and compelling character, and feel this will ultimately demonstrate that Jackson is a good guy and deserving of the presidency. He's been very successful thus far. I thought I was getting a reaction that the readers felt this was moving into "wank" direction. Jackson is a bad ass, and I feel in this story he feels a responsibility to correct the Reagan years.
I totally see where you're coming from. I'm approaching this as if it were a biography being written now about Jackson as POTUS in the 90s really. So not everything should be taken as "fact," but rather often times speculation from the "perspective" of the "author." Banning oil tankers is a total rookie move but he's also a rookie politician in a way. He jumped from civil rights leader to POTUS. There are going to be growing pains. Ever listen to the Nixon tapes? His paranoia is so deep and immense it's terrifying. Jackson isn't paranoid, he's trying to do his best. In a moment of anger, a story a biographer might hear about years later after the USSR has collapsed, "threatening" to invade USSR is just that: a moment of anger. Jackson isn't perfect by any means. He's meant to fuck up and grow. I'm not writing Jackson the man could have been, but rather the character he could have been. Edit: 100% FDR wanted to increase the Supreme Court numbers to pack the court with his own guys.I feel I overreacted a little here, let me try to explain though.
It was some of his ITL actions that made me call him a tyrant. I don't know if any president has pressured a Supreme Court Justice to resign, and banning oil tankers seems like a vast overreach of executive power and a strange and extremely heavy-handed reaction. Threatening the Soviets with an invasion over it... is beyond excessive.
I know making a timeline is hell and honestly, I wish you all the best. Good luck with the timeline!
I'm also struggling with the running mate choice. Is there any real evidence Jackson and Collins enjoyed a close relationship? =
It’s possible she could promise him some “favors” in return for being running mate.He wanted a woman. What can I say?
Working on update now.
No, it's not. This is not a situation of her accepting the nomination in order to run in 8 years, or something worse.It’s possible she could promise him some “favors” in return for being running mate.