The 1988 Israeli Presidential Election

(More context will be brought up in the next updates, this is just the opening. I hope you all enjoy it!)

Jerusalem Post
Pre-Election Polling (Second Round):

Aryeh Nehemkin: 50.69%

Rafael Eitan: 49.31%

Haaretz Pre-Election Polling (Second Round):

Aryeh Nehemkin: 52.05%

Rafael Eitan: 47.95%

"Three brigades of have been deployed to Hebron, Ramallah, and Gaza." -Amiram Nir, Channel One

"U.S. military aid to Israel 'probably suspended' if Eitan wins, says Pentagon source." -Steve Lohr, New York Times
 
"Response to Israel's Election Results." -

The Israeli public and the international press were shocked when Rafael Eitan, former Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defense Forces, came in second place at 24.26% of the vote, behind Aryeh Nehemkin at 25.52% of the vote. Eitan's hawkish views gained a considerable share of controversy, but analysts agreed that his populist platform and grounded image resonated with many Israelis. The election now moves into a second round of voting.

Already, several of the candidates eliminated on the first round have provided endorsements. Yitzhak Levy, who won 4.90% of the vote, urged his supporters to vote for Eitan. Levy represented a faction of religious right-wing Zionists, in contrast to Eitan's own secularism. On the other hand, David Zucker backed Nehemkin. His 4.48% of the vote consisted of dovish liberal Israelis.

A poll undertook by Gallup found that 39% of Israelis have "little or no faith" in the Presidential system. Previous polling put opposition to the Presidential system in Israel as low as 26 percent and as high as 32 percent. Depending on the outcome of the election this trend may continue or cease. If the Israelis were to abolish the system, the question is raised whether they would return to the Parliamentary system they abolished more than a decade ago or proceed to create a new one.

Responses to the results in the United States were as divided as in the State of Israel itself. Representative Ralph Reed (R-GA), elected two years ago this November and one of the rising stars in Congress, enthusiastically supported Eitan, "a great man." Senator Nancy Kassebaum (R-KS), the presumptive nominee for 1988, though having given no official endorsement to either candidate, says she was "concerned" about the rhetoric Eitan displayed in regards to security issues, while "impressed" with Nehemkin's diplomaticism.

The election, meanwhile, has seen an upsurge in politically incited violence. Public fights caused by political differences have increased by 13% over the last few days, and police officers around Israel have been deployed in response.
 
Shlomo_Hilel_cropped.jpg


Next update teaser
 
"Terror Still Shapes National Consciousness."

Since 1970, the use of terrorism by political groups has only increased. The Weathermen Underground conducted bombings against government offices, the Symbionese Liberation Army carried out kidnappings, bank robberies, and two assassinations. But if there was one definitive attack predating the 1985 bombing, then it was the assassination of President Fong in 1976.

However, one country that has more experience with terrorism is Israel. Groups operating under, or separately of, the umbrella of the P.L.O. have carried out high profile attacks like the Dawson's Field Hijackings, the Munich massacre and the Ma'alot massacre. Thusly, the Israeli government has taken means to combat terrorism, none of which however are quite as radical as what Mr Eitan is proposing on the campaign trail.

Shlomo Hillel, the Minister of Police, was elected by the Cabinet to succeed Prime Minister Meir in 1974. He would be elected Alignment Leader subsequently. The first Prime Minister of non-European origin, he pursued plans for increasing quality of national security to prevent Israel from becoming so vulnerable after the Yom Kippur conflict, while also pursuing negotiations with the Arab nations.

But a surge of incidents at the Lebanese border with the P.L.O. put pressure on Hillel to assert that the Government would not tolerate terrorism. The Prime Minister knew that any substantial action taken against the P.L.O. would result in President Sadat of Egypt pulling out, and felt that any delay in talks could last without end. Thus, he was initially more cautious.

When the P.L.O. launched a rocket strike, Hillel finally concurred with the hawks and authorized an aerial strike. However, it was considered limited in nature and the National Religious Party announced that it was pulling out of the government, thus forcing an election, the one whose turmoil was credited with the adoption of the State's modern constitution.

Now, Mr Eitan is calling for measures to combat terrorism in the Territories, which have upset many on the left, center, as well as the right. His opponents fear that they will violate liberties and result in agony for all involved, while his supporters believe they can be an effective deterrent. Either way, it shows just how a nation can be changed by terror.
 
Top