Rome.png


"Rome dreams of eternity , of a eternal city that will never fall, but the gods have demanded that that prize have been earned? Odysseus had to battle and resist forces both divine and mortal to return home to his wife, through harsh and seas and large monsters. Do not think that Prometheus or Jupiter has marked the Roman empire as anything special painted on the backdrop on the canvas of other nations. Parthia. Armenia. the petty kings of the moors. The Gods can just as easily find a new people as it took to coronate us people above peoples if we are not to be careful. "
-Phosphorous -


Lots of people may tell you that Rome was its own independent cultural identity, but it was really under the shadow of ancient Greece. They worshiped mostly the same gods , and made the same sacrifices. Some participated in Greek festivals, such as the Elysian mysteries and even emperors grew obsessed and fascinated with the culture of this ancient civilisation. Its poetry made its way into the halls of emperors and the senate. Its language dictated philosophy. It dominated the sciences. It conquered the field of medicine. The region was the host of large armies and home to great economic potential, lying on the shipping lanes of trade from the black sea and the eastern nations to Rome and the western tract of the empire. They idolised Greek heroes, Alexander the Great , Hercules, Theseus.

But one man would break the monopoly of Greek over the roman world, unintentionally of course, and would usher a new era for Rome, and brought the greatest change the roman empire had ever seen through its existence. He radically shaped thinking at the time, creating an almost cult like school of thought around him that would dominate Europe for the next thousand years, helping to discredit ideas such as spontaneous generation and fundamentally alter biological sciences in other ways. He sponsored expeditions that would bring new food stuffs and animals to the eternal city and the rest of the empire from all three continents, while creating a scientist method that was so simply, yet so robust. His stubborn refusal to publish his findings , and produce literature in the language of the Greeks, would encourage others in his school and across the western side of the empire to do the same, and his experiments produce results that would even help shatter the upper echelons of roman society. [1]

We find his name everywhere. He was the patron and donor of money of hospitals and leper colonies. We find his statue in Rome, in Corintheus [2], in Valentia [3] , in Valentine [4]. We find university blocs dedicated to him in Italia , Geluland [5] , Natanland [6] . He is credited with the invention of the shopping mall. And provoking Roman interest up north, with explorers staking the flag into lands long riddled with ice. But who was the man? Who, not even a ruler embarking on great conquest, helped shape the world in such divergent and ways that changed history forever?

4b9550dd04117ef8a6263d487134ff31.jpg


His name , is Phosphorus
And the biological revolution , begins here...​


[1] This is in no way designed to be a simple Roman wank. In fact quite the opposite. Rome will fall, as usual, around the same timeframe. New changes and influences to agriculture , zoology and medicine do not in any way combat the heavy imperial administration and rotting corruption that dominated the later years of the empire. Though i do see it leading to a higher population and ability to feed the city of Rome, which will lead to new dynamics of their own. A huge cultural footprint far bigger then before , more complex dynamics with diseases , and perhaps increased importance of the provinces of Britannia , Gaul and Germania.
[2] Corintheus is the former capital of the Roman Province of Britannia, built on the banks of the river Thames.
[3] Valentia , vulgar Latin for Valencia.
[4] Valentine , in Cumbria, Britannia.
[5] Geluland, the orkneys , named for the ice that develops. The harsh climate proved ultimately unappetising to Roman colonisers.
[6] Natanland, the isles of Scilly, named for the diversity of fish caught off their waters. Not to be confused with Nova Natanland.

 
OIP.PdIxG-NinQT1ho9PnqX2bgAAAA


roman-caps.png

roman-caps.png



ACT 1 - His most flawed work, Hypothesi tauri

Phosphorous was one of the most influential teachers and roman citizens of the early roman empire period. He is often hailed as being the most influential scientist in the field of biology since Aristotle himself. Creating new breeds of cattle and forms of life, refuting flawed theories purported bye cultural and scientific tradition of time, and creating new ones himself. He travelled the lands collecting evidence for his hypothesis, and encouraged experiments and dissections to prevent error and invalid conclusions. His achievements are truly staggering, even receiving an estate from Gnaeus Julius Agricola for his contribution to Britannia and Gaul. So what is his story?

Born in Narbo, the provincial capital of Narbonensis in Gaul, he grew up around his family villa, excelling at literature and the Greek epics, due to his great tutor, from Pontus , and pottering around the natural world. His fascination with animal life, would only serve to fuel his future career. But any ambitions of his seemed like they would have to be put on hold after he went to study rhetoric and philosophy in Athens. His family had run out of revenue due to a bad famine that had hit southern Gaul , leaving the family functionally penniless and forcing them to sell off the property . Fortunately for Phosphorous , according to his close friends and great men who wrote about him, he positively exuded charisma. A man he found and made acquaintances with , Lucius , who owned estates that traded and reared cattle, decided to take him under his wing. He would journey to Dariorigum to work on his estate, and in return, would be given a place to stay, and finance his research.

He set to work immediately, jumping at the work, with much vigour which pleased Lucius, who took him across the local area when selling cattle, and used him as a source of advice, becoming a close friend. Phosphorous in those days discovered a pattern, relating to the livestock of southern Gaul on his travels. The small farms and homesteads run bye the native Gaul's had different types of cattle compared to those of the villas. The local cattle were smaller, and less diverse in colour, being mostly greys and browns. They produced less good meat in juxtaposition to the new roman types. There meat was eaten later too, at the end of the bull and cows life, in juxtaposition to the prime age of the roman bulls. Why was this? Phosphorous produced the first, and only attempt to answer this in his first ever text, Hypothesi tauri becoming one of the founders of agricultural science.

The first hypothesis for the size and difference between the cows was that with the introduction of the iron plough to western Europe, the best size to manage the plough was considerably smaller then Roman cattle. Over time, the Celts, through subconscious artificial selection had managed to rear cattle that were better suited to their needs in the workforce. Man had changed and distorted the land , carving new valleys and new hills, why could they not mould life itself, like Prometheus when he blessed each animal , but ran out of traits for man. This made sense because it linked with the tradition to consume the flesh only when the cow cannot work any more, which you would not do if you were rearing them for the best meat.

The second hypothesis was that while Roman cattle were better at surviving the warm Mediterranean climate and found it harder surviving the harsh northern conditions, smaller cattle may instead be better for survival in colder, more frigid environments. However he mentions in his work that he does not believe in this particular hypothesis, for Northern Hispania , despite being warm like mainland Italia, had cattle like those in Gaul, and Southern Britannia according to Lucius and other cattle merchants . The third hypothesis was based on the fact that Gaulic cows produced around 20% less milk, and so he assumed the Roman cattle are just superior to the cattle from the rural homesteaders because they are the ones that have been selected. Only those who where rich , those who dwelt in the villas, and military garrisons , could import the better stock from Italy , or Carthage compared to rural homesteaders and natives , where the more corrupted and lower quality stock bred with themselves , reinforcing their position among the lower echelons of society.

In conclusion, the piece of literature pointed towards the first and third hypothesis instead of the second as most accurate, noting that those had more substantial physical evidence. Though he does note the potential of unreliability of accounts in southern Britannia and the potentially anomalous position of Hispanian cattle, due to constant exchange with Gaul he seemed to stick with his evaluation. He suggested to split 'Cattle' mainly into two separate super groups , one based on larger Italian stock, and off general European smaller stock , with the potential to create a third category for Egyptian populations, though this particular theory never took off. This was because it threatened to shake up the traditional Roman cattle classification. Furthermore of these breeds he suggests to promote the Italian (or what the traditional roman reader would consider Etruscan) populations across the entire empire, and the larger estates, to increase cattle productivity and meat production , while maintaining the other varieties only where it was economically unprofitable too move and transition to the better alternative.

Though it met initially only a somewhat warm reception at Rome, and it was incredibly flawed looking at it from a modern context , it served its goal as intended. It beautifully showed his writing style that would become so distinctive, three competing hypothesis and then a conclusion evaluating the flaws and strength of each Hypothesis. What was more important though, at least in the short term, is that it put him on the map. His book entered imperial library's and helped bolster his reputation, though it did not result in any personal profit. While it was in circulation it became the most read book on cattle at least academically, known for its indepth knowledge on the economic and ecological role of the livestock. Furthermore it promoted the idea of selected cattle breeding through a method called the 'hand of Prometheus' (what could only as artificial selection) that was the culmination of theories and writings developed bye the ancient Carthaginians and romans before him, with the practical application of Phosphorous's . The years of studying cattle meant a more personal development happened with Phosphorous, for not only did he know this animal better then any other, but he now focused the majority of his life on testing his theories on this type of animal, and researching this beast.​
 
Last edited:
Interesting start. Looks like the focus will be on day-to-day life changes in the Roman Empire more than anything.
Yes , hopefully. Though there will still be some focus on geopolitical changes and great men, especially after the roman empire falls (it has too eventually), for the first act of the timeline it is focusing on the changing of greater society, and really what new social changes exert on the aristocracy, emperor and senate, not the other way around.
 

iddt3

Donor
[1] This is in no way designed to be a simple Roman wank. In fact quite the opposite. Rome will fall, as usual, around the same timeframe. New changes and influences to agriculture , zoology and medicine do not in any way combat the heavy imperial administration and rotting corruption that dominated the later years of the empire. Though i do see it leading to a higher population and ability to feed the city of Rome, which will lead to new dynamics of their own. A huge cultural footprint far bigger then before , more complex dynamics with diseases , and perhaps increased importance of the provinces of Britannia , Gaul and Germania.
Increasing its tax base substantially along with agricultural productivity is actually probably enough to get Rome to survive, at least in some form. A major problem for the late empire, especially on the west, was insufficient resources to support the army and administration, as the economy became increasingly schleotic.

It looks like you're fundamentally changing those dynamics here. So even if Rome "falls" the underlying economy and infrastructure is such that it's more likely to end up with a foreign dynasty taking over, rather than the whole thing falling apart, like China.
 
Increasing its tax base substantially along with agricultural productivity is actually probably enough to get Rome to survive, at least in some form. A major problem for the late empire, especially on the west, was insufficient resources to support the army and administration, as the economy became increasingly schleotic.

It looks like you're fundamentally changing those dynamics here. So even if Rome "falls" the underlying economy and infrastructure is such that it's more likely to end up with a foreign dynasty taking over, rather than the whole thing falling apart, like China.
Thats something i had not really thought about in relations with the state having difficulties with financial problems in of themselve, though that is good points. Ive mostly been thinking of the changes on the relation of science and philosiphy, and how the lower masses would interact with it. But i havnt thought of it that much on a national level. Of course ive got some time before i get to the 'fall of the west' or the 400s AD or smth, but do you have any sources , or literature i could research about this?
 
IIRC archaeological evidence indicates that Rome made much greater use of water power in its Northwestern provinces than it did elsewhere. Given Phosphorus' established interest in Gaul and Britainnia, might he also write on water wheels and their utility?
 
IIRC archaeological evidence indicates that Rome made much greater use of water power in its Northwestern provinces than it did elsewhere. Given Phosphorus' established interest in Gaul and Britainnia, might he also write on water wheels and their utility?
The Chances are unlikely, but possible. Phosphorous as a researcher and scholar is most interested in the fields of biology , philosophy and medicine. Hes no practical engineer, and would not have the resources, or know how to really publish or popularise them. However i can imagine how he would indirectly affect this particular technology. I can imagine he will bring scholars and students to wherever he sets up his base of operations (which will be in gaul) which will encourage the skilled production of books and appropriate industries, and a cycle , which attracts different sorts of people who are more likely to comment on them and their utility.

I never have really thought about the application of the water wheel really though. Would the water wheel spreading around have any change on roman society? How things are produced, how water is collected e.c.t e.c.t? What did the romans use it for?
 
Top