Not really relevant, but why is Cooper the Greenback's candidate in the first place? He's an extremely wealthy New Yorker industrialist representing...an alliance of poor white farmers and southern blacks? It just seems a little odd to me, is all.
Also, fun-fact: if Cooper wins he'll be the oldest US President (probably ever) - he'll be 86 at inauguration (Reagan, OTL's oldest, was a little south of 70)
Cooper's in the lead. I guess we are showing respect to our elders.
Yup, which is why im pretty okay with ether of them winning.He was one of Americas first philanthropists. He led a pretty humble life even though he was rich. He donated money to alot of good causes and was a national spokesman for most of the Greenback partys goals. He had name recognition.
He was actually a pretty good man, made his money in decent ways.
God damn it.
Well, isnt this amazingly petty of him.
He sent me a PM thanking me for my support of Cooper from the beginning.
I must say, Cooper is the last candidate I would have expected to win due to a corrupt election/ballot-stuffing
The thing is, I don't really care who wins in the pre-1900 series, but I don't want some ass**** deliberately skewing the results with what are in effect political ads.
God damn it.
Could I be the faithless elector if this happens?If Cooper does manage to win (and it does seem he will), you ought to reflect this in the electoral college map by having Cooper win by a faithless elector.
Could I be the faithless elector if this happens?