I'm sure Russian nationalists and Yellow Peril paranoids will love the new status quo in Northeast Asia.
If you meant this sarcastically, then you're correct .
I would have thought the assault on Tsingtao would have been comparably bloody for the troops engaged. The Germans would be dug in with machine guns, and the Chinese, lacking artillery but awash in manpower, would resort to frontal attacks. The Japanese at Port Arthur got badly chewed up by the Russian defenses in a similar situation.
True, and the Chinese did suffer. The difference is that on the front near Ypres they enjoy no such thing as numerical superiority.
Right, my bad .With the CEF in action almost entirely in the British sector of the front, wouldn't Chiang learn English better than French?
I did assume that none-white male-white female unions would be considered more controversial than the opposite.But France didn't really have such a taboo, compared to the anglosphere. Of course what I've heard of has mostly been white male-non-white-female unions, so the reverse could be a factor. But then also France was very short of men after the War.
Wouldn't that also depend on the region though? Some parts of France were more conservative than others.Also, religious conversions wouldn't be a big factor. France was once intensely Catholic, but by this time, laïcité was dominant. A large proportion of marriages were civil only. Any French woman who would marry a Chinaman would be pretty much secular.
All I can find is that they sprang up in the early 20th century, but not exactly when.London's "Chinatown" in Limehouse dated back to about 1890; but that was because London was a seaport. Wiki sez Paris had a Chinese district before the war, in the 3rd Arrondissement.
Dunno, Hitler spent a lot of his time reading during WW I. And a pamphlet doesn't take much resources to publish. All you need is to find someone who'll lend you his printing press.There seems to be sequence error here: if Mao is KIA in 1918, he can't be among the postwar intellectuals. Also, it seems unlikely that as a junior combat officer he would have leisure to read and write, or resources to publish.
And Japan does nothing and just lets things pass?
Well, war against somebody who was your ally a week ago wouldn't be looked upon positively. Besides that, they just got a huge piece of real estate in eastern Russia to digest, about five times the size of the Japanese Home Islands in fact. Picking on Russia, I imagine, would do much to ameliorate Japanese dissatisfaction about not getting Tsingtao.
Indeed.A wise move - they were an endless source of intrigue in OTL.
At this point, I imagine they'd be more Han than Manchu.Han or Manchu outsiders?
The Japanese are though, and it'd give them an excuse to beat up China.If China decides to check the bluff of Western powers, Britain and France are in no position to re-enforce the Boxer protocols.
Nobody gave a shit when Hendryk did the same thing in his Superpower Empire TL, which happens to have a PoD in about the same timeframe.Why is the Japanese policy towards China completely reversed to OTL? They did have proponents of a cooperative policy with a strong China, but in OTL Japan had the power to disintegrate the whole country - here they just somehow stay put and ignore everything that happens in China?
Especially since China - correctly - fears the Japanese reaction that somehow never materializes through these stunning foreign policy coups.
Also, the difference is that China has been an ally in WW I and the Japanese have seen the capabilities of a resurgent China. Besides that, declaring a war on someone you fought and bled with might be frowned upon. That could lend more weight to those "proponents of a cooperative policy with a strong China." At this point, a Japanese kick to the door won't cause the entire structure to come down anymore.
Besides that, I'd hardly call Yakutian independence a foreign policy coup. Picking on a country that's mired in civil war is easy to do. IOTL the Japanese did the same to warlord era China.
Hmm, interesting. We have a revanchanistic Russia that is going to want to take back what it lost to China. My question is, wouldn't Kolchak be viewed as a traitor by Russian nationalists, as opposed to their icon? An interesting scenario here would be a less crazy Fascist Germany, Italy, and Russia vs the European allies and China. The wild card here is Japan... might I suggest a SSJW started by the Chinese? Hell, they could even do a Pacific War against the Brits. I am interested to see where this goes.
The question is who a revanchist Russia wants to take on first. Do they want Finland, the Baltic states, Poland and Moldova back first, or are their Far Eastern territories more important to them? Sure, they look big on a map, but they're sparsely populated, underdeveloped and economically worthless.
Last edited: