Is it possible that the New Netherlands could've theoretically become its own Republic in the mold of the Dutch Republic?
New Holland is Australia. New Netherlands was the name. And yes I meant the Dutch controlled areas of what would become New York.The Dutch Republic was acon-federation in is pure form. The dis advantege over time was a central government, for daily matters.
All States (Provinces) were semi-autonomus exept on foreign affairs.
The best to compare it is with present day European Union only ith a ruling faction or State.
In case of the dutch Republic ths was the State of Holland and the city of Amsterdam, simply because they were contributing the bulk of the Republic finances.
New Holland, I assume you mean New Amsterdam ( New York) and the teritory around the Hudson river up North, was ruled on the same way as Amsterdam. These right were granted in 1656 by the Estates General. The city was ruled by a counsel and a mayor, but could be expended by more mayors, like Amsterdam.
The Colony it self would be governed on a simmilair way.
This could evolve in a democracy but could also evolve in a corrupt inefficien oriarchy like the republic become in the 18th century.
New Amsterdam had a difficult start (compared to the English settlements) mostly due to mismanagement and counterproductive regulations of the WIC, but when the influence of the WIC was removed and a city counsil was established the colony saw a significant economical and population growth. This growth almost never stoped so the influx of new colonist could be a guaranty that a true democratic system emerge or prevent an oliarchy.
Actually I believe that Dutch Brasil was also known as New Holland. (also I think that New Jersey and parts of Delaware and even parts of Connecticut were part of the New Netherlands).New Holland is Australia. New Netherlands was the name. And yes I meant the Dutch controlled areas of what would become New York.
Actually I believe that Dutch Brasil was also known as New Holland. (also I think that New Jersey and parts of Delaware and even parts of Connecticut were part of the New Netherlands).
Sorry, mistake, New York and surroundings was called New Netherlands or Nova Belgica.
Brasil was New Holland and if I am correct Australia was called Terra Australis Holandia or something to give this part of the map a name.
It is just latin for New Netherlands. Belgium and Netherlands used to be synonims.I've never heard of Nova Belgica.
Is it possible that the New Netherlands could've theoretically become its own Republic in the mold of the Dutch Republic?
Simple, make sure the British don't want to or care for it. Make it a British ally for example. Or make it independent when the British aren't suurounding i, because either New England or the southern colonies (or both) are independent. Or make it so Dutch (in language or culture) the British aren't interested in it, but not dangerous enough to make them want to neutralise it.Independence from The Netherlands could be possible....but I don't see how this independent New Netherlands can avoid being swallowed up by British?
Simple, make sure the British don't want to or care for it. Make it a British ally for example. Or make it independent when the British aren't suurounding i, because either New England or the southern colonies (or both) are independent. Or make it so Dutch (in language or culture) the British aren't interested in it, but not dangerous enough to make them want to neutralise it.