King Americana: If the USA Had a King

Prologue
Hey all. I've been a lurker for a good while, and only recently joined this forum. So, I want to give this whole AH thing a shot. If you have any comments or concerns, feel free to share, as I've never done something like this before. Now, on to the show.


King Americana: If the USA Had a King
Prologue

The year is 1783. The still brand new United States of America had just achieved a feat most people couldn't do: defeat the British. After 8-or-so years of fighting the Redcoats, the US had signed the Treaty of Paris. In the treaty, the British had to accept and recognize the independence of the United States. They also had to cede territory all the way to the Mississippi River, giving them access to its resources. This was a giant win for the Colonists.

For the next few years, the US would follow the Articles of Confederation, which treated the states more like their own countries. The people feared that if the central government was too strong, it would remind them of the British government, so the Articles had lots of restrictions. The powers of this central government were not much: war, diplomacy, and resolving disputes between states. It didn't have the power, however, to pass legislation regarding the economy, so that caused economic decline. Also, for a law to pass Congress, it needed a very high majority of the states, and for an Amendment to pass, every state needed to approve.

Basically, governing the country was left to the states. This confusing government lead to mutinies in Pennsylvania and NJ in 1781, soldiers marching on the capital in 1783, and the Newburgh Conspiracy, which would've overthrown George Washington.

The unrest lead to Shays' Rebellion in 1786 and 1787, which called for a better Constitution. Would the people get it? Yes.

Scene at the Signing of the United States Constitution

Scene at the Signing of the Constitution of the United States, made by Howard Chandler Christy in 1940.

Between May and September, 1787, delegates from the 13 states convened, initially to reform the Articles, but in the end, to create a new Constitution.

This Constitution would describe how states would be admitted, and how borders would change. It outlined how the Constitution could be amended. It made federal laws superior to state laws, and it stated that to ratify the Constitution, a state needed to host a ratifying convention, where they would vote on the subject there. But, the most important part were the 3 branches of the government. They knew Congress would make up the legislative branch, and the Supreme Court the judicial branch, but what about the executive branch? Who would lead such an important part of the country?

This question lead to a slight delay, as the delegates bickered about what title this person would have. In the end, after about 6 days of this bickering, the delegates decided... that it would be a King.

Some people did not like this decision. Of course, one of the reasons why this wasn't a good choice to some was simple: the country gained independence from a kingdom, and they didn't want to be a kingdom. Others believed this would give the person too much power. As a result, on September 24, 1787, the day the delegates were to sign the Constitution, a mob of people who didn't support a King surrounded Independence Hall, preventing them from entering. The delegates had to postpone the signing to the next day, September 25. The mob arrived after the delegates, so they were successfully able to enter the building and get the signing over with.

So now, it was up to the states to ratify it. The first state to ratify, making it the first US state, was Delaware. They were followed by Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and by 1789, 11 of the 13 states had already ratified it (the other 2 were North Carolina and Rhode Island).

A new question lied upon the people: Who will be the King? Which of the millions of Americans will be chosen to lead the country and pass on his legacy to his children and their children, and on and on? This was a good question, and it required the decision... of Congress.



On January 14, 1789, in a special session, Congress would decide who becomes the King of the United States.

For 13 long, grueling hours, the choice as to who would become the King came down to 3 people: former General George Washington, Founding Father John Adams, and Founding Father Thomas Jefferson.

The entire Congress was required to cast a single vote. In the end, the results would be read out, and whoever had the most votes would be crowned as the first King of the United States.

It took 11 minutes, but they finally had a decision:

George Washington, Virginia3162%
Thomas Jefferson, Virginia1326%
John Adams, Massachusetts612%

They voted overwhelmingly in favor of the former General of the Continental Army, and with that, on March 4, 1789, Washington would officially be crowned as King George I of the United States.

Now, George had to ask himself a question, as the days to him becoming King came closer: Is he up for the challenge? Is he capable of leading an entire country with millions of people who could become angry if you make a single bad choice? Most importantly of all, does he feel like this whole King thing won't be so bad after all?

We'll just have to wait and see.
 
Chapter 1: Coronation, Massacre, and Laws
LET'S GO! ALL HAIL GEORGE I !
Yep. Obviously, he would be chosen to lead the country as a King, same as in OTL. To me, not choosing him just feels... weird.


Chapter 1: Coronation, Massacre, and Laws
undefined

George Washington at Freedom Hall in New York City, being inaugurated as President in 1789.


On April 30, 1789, in New York City, George Washington was officially crowned as King George I of the United States. This was met from most with jubilee, as the famous war general who beat the British is now the one who gets to rule over the country. The country was in a weird situation, and George was ready to fix it. The road to recovery would be slow and steady, however.

George had to deal with one big thing first: protests. Throughout a good bit of the country, protests have popped up, with people showing their displeasure for having a King. The biggest was in Philadelphia. This might've been fueled by the exact same thing, happening just across the pond, in France. More on that later.

On May the 3rd, the Philadelphia protests reached a breaking point. At first it was about a hundred people rioting, but now, it was hundreds of people. George ordered for a Pennsylvania militia to deal with the issue. He knew what could possible happen: people get too rowdy, soldiers shoot, people die. But, George has been through it as a general. He understands that this could end up being a massacre. All he had to say was, "If it's a massacre the people want, it's a massacre the people will get."

The large crowd was described by some as "rowdy, drunk, and ready to explode." Yes, the crowd was very rowdy, and maybe they were drunk, but they sure were ready to explode. The soldiers met the crowd of protesters near Independence Hall. The people began pelting the militia with pebbles, which turned to rocks. This was starting to look like the Boston Massacre, but instead of the British, it's the state militia.

However, the militia stood strong, as they also knew that things could potentially get bloody, so they let the people continue to pelt them with rocks. Chants of "Out with the King!" could be heard for miles.

The militia general, however, had it. He ordered the soldiers to fire... and they did.


11 people died, and another 8 were wounded. The people ran away as the shots were fired, but if they didn't, that could've meant further casualties.

In a speech made after said event, on May 4th, George showed some sympathy to the people, but stated that he did it to protect his power:

"I do send my condolences to the families of those who were wounded, and of those who were killed. However, it was in the best interest to send the troops because of the possibility that these civilians could group together and overthrow the government, and replace said government with a republic. I did not order them to shoot, the general did."
Now that a potential coup was out of the way, George could get to business.

Since gaining independence, there has still been a lot of British exports in America, while there weren't much American exports in Britain. George wanted the US to be less British and more American. So, he signed a law which would heavily tax British exports, like tea. Within the first month or so, tea consumption per person per month in the States dropped considerably, by about 25%. This was a very considerable start in the de-Britainization of the United States.


On May 17th, 1789, North Carolina held a convention, and as a result of it, officially joined the US as its 12th state. The only state that has yet to do so... Rhode Island.

The city of Providence was full of Federalists, and they wanted the state to ratify the Constitution so that they can be a state. Some Anti-Federalists wouldn't budge on the Constitution for one reason--- it didn't specify the rights of the people. These Anti-Federalists said they would only support the Constitution if it had a Bill of Rights.

On May 29th, an Anti-Federalist in the Senate, William Maclay, proposed the Bill of Rights. Most of the Senate was pro-Federalist, which meant they might approve. Maclay explained that the Bill of Rights gave the people the right to: freedoms of religion, press, speech, and freedom to assemble; bear arms, fair trial, speedy trial, etc. Most Federalists agreed to it just to keep the Anti-Federalists happy. In a vote of 17-3, the Bill of Rights passed the Senate. It would then make its way to the House of Representatives, where it passed in a vote of 47-11 on June 5th. It was now ready to become Amendments of the Constitution. All that was left was to let the states ratify it.

Chapter 2 coming soon...
 
Keep up the Goodwork!
Thanks for the positivity. It takes quite a lot of thinking to make this, but I'm gonna keep at it.

Sounds interesting.
What is going to be the political system adopted - parliamentary?
Most likely a parliamentary system. The King is still the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, and he can still do some (but not all) presidential duties, but for the most part, he'll be just a simple figurehead. Meaning, yes, there will be a Prime Minister.

As for Prime Minister, I'm most likely gonna say it'll be John Adams (since he was Vice President first). If Adams isn't chosen, though, I'll probably pick Thomas Jefferson.
 
Very good series, I love a King George Washington TL, hopefully these riots and anti-monarchial ideas don't spread. Can't wait to see what France gets up to, keep up the great work 👍👍👍
 
Sounds interesting.
What is going to be the political system adopted - parliamentary?

Just to serve a curveball, is it possible for a monarchical America to develop a political system akin to the one it currently has, i.e. a Presidential system but also with a King?
Is that possible?
The idea being that the King almost exists outside of the political system or exists above the Presidency?
 
It would be interesting if the republicans were to go west and found their own nation. Imagine the challenges if, for instance, Texas were to get Northern abolitionist republicans along with Southern slave-owning republicans. Or if the Republic of California were to survive long enough to actually select a capital. Most of the territory claimed by Spain north of the Rio Grande is absurdly sparsely-populated. Spain isn’t going to be able to hold onto it when the republicans make their move.

I also agree with the sentiment of having the government under the king resemble the OTL US government as much as possible. Naming their prime minister figure the “President” would help to distinguish themselves from Britain.
 
Chapter 2: A Revolution in Europe

Thanks, one and all, for the support. I couldn't do this without y'all.

Chapter 2: A Revolution in Europe

George Washington - Wikipedia

King George, in regular clothing.

As the people begin settling down and accepting the title of King, the people in France aren't too happy about the whole King thing.

You see, after the American Revolution, France was in financial debt, which was being wasted on the nobility and clergy. To find a solution to the issue, King Louis XVI summoned something that hadn't been summoned in over 100 years: the Estates-General.

The Estates-General would vote on matters to help solve the issue of the economy. All the higher estates wanted was to raise taxes on the poor. All the poor wanted was to enforce taxes on the rich. However, they would be outvoted 2-1, and therefore asked to have their power doubled. Louis said he was planning on this, but it was never actually put in place.

Protests were at an all-time high, as they asked for food, lower taxes, and representation. Louis and his wife, Marie Antionette, again stated that they were working on this (they weren't).


When asked on the issue during a speech in Boston on June 11th, King George stated:

"Hopefully their revolutionary ideas won't infiltrate our people. If they're having problems running their own kingdom, that's for them to solve. It is not for us in America to join in on. If the people are protesting, that's for them to solve. It is not for us in America to join in on. Simple as that."

Things were not looking so hot for the French monarchy. Their entire history was at stake, all because of the rich nobility. George did not want for the people to revolt against the monarchy just because the French were.


On June 19th, elections were held to select the 1st Prime Minister of the United States. The person with the most votes would win. The candidates (tried to use photos of them when they were younger):

John Adams | The White House
Thomas Jefferson - Wikipedia
George Clinton (vice president) - Wikipedia
John Adams
Thomas Jefferson
George Clinton
Massachusetts
Virginia
New York

A caveat was that only white people who owned land would be allowed to vote. That only meant roughly 44,000 land-owning white people would be able to vote. Although they came in droves, it was much closer than expected.

The official count:

Candidate NameTotal Votes% of Vote
Adams14,59033.3%
Jefferson14,65233.5%
Clinton14,54033.2%

Demand for all 3 candidates was high, and after a very tense count, it was confirmed that Thomas Jefferson would become the first Prime Minister.

In a ceremony in New York on July 1st, 1789, Thomas Jefferson would officially be sworn in as the 1st Prime Minister of the United States, serving a 4-year term. The Democratic-Republicans (probably called a different name in this scenario) scored a huge win. Jefferson's party promoted equality, liberty, equal rights, free markets, free trade, and sympathy... with the French Revolution.

Some were worried that the Jeffersonian Party (a common nickname for the party at this point) would sponsor a giant revolution that would overthrow the monarchy. George was slightly worried, but he still held his ground against republicanism.

George's main concern was that Jefferson would pass reforms to make the country less of a monarchy, and more of a republic, which would slowly remove the King's power. George didn't want that. Luckily, the Constitution gave him a final say in what laws are passed or not. This meant an Act of Congress would need to be signed by both PM Jefferson and King George to pass. If even one of them vetoed it, it would need to be agreed on by a majority of Congress to pass anyway.

Also at this point, on July 13th, Rhode Island ratified the Constitution, meaning all 13 colonies have officially become states.

So, a prime minister who likes republicanism, growing concerns over the French Revolution, and a crowd gathering at the Bastille in Paris... what'll happen next? We'll just have to wait... and see.

Chapter 3 coming soon...
 
Great chapter, can't wait to see the French Revolution in full swing. Hopefully Jefferson won't go to hard against the Washington Monarchy, he will surely find a good deal of enemies. Will this be threadmarked?
 
Great chapter, can't wait to see the French Revolution in full swing. Hopefully Jefferson won't go to hard against the Washington Monarchy, he will surely find a good deal of enemies. Will this be threadmarked?
Thanks for reminding me. Forgot to add threadmark. It’s fixed now.

Also, Jefferson might be thinking to himself of a way to get rid of the King’s power entirely. He’s just gotta do it secretly, so that nobody notices.

Great work! wish the best for America
Thank you for the compliment. I wish them the best too.
 
Is it " the every generation of king need people vote in order to become king " thing because it will be just a president with the title of king.
 
Speaking of which, considering Alexander Hamilton IOTL wanted an elective monarchy in all but name with the "Governor" system and all that, how much of a role would he have in future American politics ITTL?
 
Top