In a sense. Mainly this reflects a problem in selecting someone for a leadership position based on their performance as a staff officer. Phillips also benefited from coming into Churchill's attention.Peter principle, I guess.
In a sense. Mainly this reflects a problem in selecting someone for a leadership position based on their performance as a staff officer. Phillips also benefited from coming into Churchill's attention.Peter principle, I guess.
So...like Eisenhower?In a sense. Mainly this reflects a problem in selecting someone for a leadership position based on their performance as a staff officer. Phillips also benefited from coming into Churchill's attention.
How many ships are in ATL Force Z?
IOTL, it was just PoW, Repulse and 4 Destroyers.
I "liked" this post, but, this is a gray area for me. Sending them to the US suggests 5" 38cal; these vessels were top heavy with 8 4"HA OTL, the best they could hope for is a HMS Delhi-like refit with 5 guns. How about concentrating on increasing the top speed to vic of 32 kts, improve the electronics suite, radar, directors, etc, and keep the UK type AAA upgrade, pending the arrival of VT fuses for 4" shells? Or, even, US 90mm/Brit 3.7" AA guns? Suspect the latter has logistic consequences...What I feel would be useful and acceptable to the Admiralty would be deploying the C-Class AA cruisers to the Far East as escorts, or even get them refitted/rebuilt in American ports as potent anti-aircraft platforms.
Not threadmarked?November 14, 1941 RAF Kallang, Singapore Island
.
I "liked" this post, but, this is a gray area for me. Sending them to the US suggests 5" 38cal; these vessels were top heavy with 8 4"HA OTL, the best they could hope for is a HMS Delhi-like refit with 5 guns. How about concentrating on increasing the top speed to vic of 32 kts, improve the electronics suite, radar, directors, etc, and keep the UK type AAA upgrade, pending the arrival of VT fuses for 4" shells? Or, even, US 90mm/Brit 3.7" AA guns? Suspect the latter has logistic consequences...
Always felt that whoever said, "Bombers are a real threat to our fleet, how about converting those old light cruisers to a kind of AAA ship?" is one of the unsung heroes of WW2...imagine their contribution to "supplies" getting through was tremendous.Agreed, I don't know a lot about the subject, and the C-Class AAs seem to be little researched. What could be done to cut down the masts/superstructures/funnels, reducing topweight and silhouette? Did they still have the torpedo tubes? Additional ballast? Or have they reached their zenith as war-fighting ships? For their age, they served with distinction in the many less glamorous tasks that were the purview of the cruiser, and sadly have so little recognition for their crucial contribution to the war, in which six of the thirteen ships and over six-hundred men paid the ultimate price, a VC being awarded to a member of Coventry's crew (some scumbag stole it in 1990). Truly, until she was decommissioned in 2011, I'd never heard of Caroline.
Always felt that whoever said, "Bombers are a real threat to our fleet, how about converting those old light cruisers to a kind of AAA ship?" is one of the unsung heroes of WW2...imagine their contribution to "supplies" getting through was tremendous.
Agreed, I don't know a lot about the subject, and the C-Class AAs seem to be little researched. What could be done to cut down the masts/superstructures/funnels, reducing topweight and silhouette? Did they still have the torpedo tubes? Additional ballast? Or have they reached their zenith as war-fighting ships? For their age, they served with distinction in the many less glamorous tasks that were the purview of the cruiser, and sadly have so little recognition for their crucial contribution to the war, in which six of the thirteen ships and over six-hundred men paid the ultimate price, a VC being awarded to a member of Coventry's crew (some scumbag stole it in 1990). Truly, until she was decommissioned in 2011, I'd never heard of Caroline.
Did they still have the torpedo tubes?
My thoughts on this, the torpedo tubes were removed at conversion to AA Cruisers, looking at photos, the only weight reductions could be cutting down the mainmast, and possibly lowering the tripod mast. imo the biggest weakness at this time, was minimal light AA aft, the quad pompom wad in the B mount,and 2 x4 .50 cal Vickers were just aft of the bridge structure, and the 20 mm's , were not yet mounted in all. A trip to American Yards could have resulted in an overhaul of machinery, and improvements in AA fire control. Question is could this have been accomplished in the time frame prior to the outbreak of the war.
. TheHaven't found anything to indicate that the TT were ever replaced.
There was originally a second quad pom pom aft, but they were removed due to shortage of this system, and replaced by the 2 quad Vickers .50s.
I must dig out Winkle Brown's autobiography.Half an hour later, the Martlet pilot had been dismissed from the bridge after a perfunctory dressing down for risking his aircraft, his convoy and his life, in that order for a stupid stunt. Audacity’s captain waited until the young, hostilities only pilot had cleared the bridge before allowing himself a smile.
As a writing note, I am entering where this story originally started in my mind November 1941-March 1942. Some of the updates are some of the earliest chunks written of this saga, so please be aware of changes in style and continuity issues. If you see a continuity issue, please tell me so I can update.
I really need to go back through my Malayan and Luzon campaigns so there are probably going to be errors here. I appreciate your patience on this.
Is it worth putting a temporary hiatus on this, and going through your previous posts to check them? Could even publish a timeline-only thread as you work your way through it.