The Italo-German border is fine, but I really have to protest, what the heck Romania is doing with Transylvania and Dobruja and Yugoslavia (???) with Croatia, Macedonia, and Bosnia ?? This is unfeasible. When the Hapsburg Empire breaks down and is partitioned, Bismarck would surely ensure that German ally Greater Hungary gets Slovakia, Transylvania, and Croatia. And they most likely get Bosnia later, as well.
Also, since judging from the Franco-Belgian-German border this looks like a post-WWI map, then Italy ought to have Tunisia as well. Italy most likely gets Montenegro (it had a vague dynastic claim on it) and Bulgaria gets Macedonia and Dobruja from Romania. France ought to have lost French Flanders to Belgium and Belgium Flanders to Netherlands. Also, the Russian border is all wrong, they ought to have lost Finland (likely with Karelia), the Baltic states, Belarus, Congress-Austrian Poland, and Galicia-Bessarabia-Ukraine, which ought to be CP puppets by now. Romania ought to get Bessarabia and Odessa if they eventually went CP.
Alternatively, this is a pre-WWI, post-Balkan Wars map, then the Russian border is fine, but Greater Hungary still has to own Transylvania, Croatia, and Bosnia. Albania to Italy is quite reasonable, Montenegro ought to be either an independent Italian puppet or annexed to Italy. If Bulgaria has annexed Eastern Thrace, then it has won the Balkan Wars with CP support (expect WWI to erupt within weeks or months when Serbia cries aid to Russia). Therefore it ought to have Macedonia and Dobruja and Serbia to be contained to Serbia proper and Kosova. Likewise Romania ought to be limited to Moldavia and Wallachia. As it concerns the Western border, it is feasible as the result of France losing the 1870 war to the Italo-German alliance (born ironclad when they partitioned the Hapsburg Empire) and getting an even harsher peace: they lost the whole of Lorraine as well as Alsace to Germany (substantial French minority but the Germans as quite able to keep them into line, like Czech and Posen Poles) and Savoy, Nice, and Corsica to Italy. Luxemburg was likely annexed by Germany after the war (possibly it was the casus belli, when France tried to annex it, instead of the Spanish succession). France has surely spent the last 40 years foaming at the mouth at the thought of Germany and Italy. The Belgian border has no sense as the result of the 1870 war (Belgium was neutral in the Franco-German war, nor would have Bismarck messed with it, at the sure risk of drawing Britain in the conflict). Therefore, Germany ought not have Eastern Wallonia. However, that border may make sense if the Great Powers agreed to partition Belgium instead of setting it up as a neutral buffer state in 1831: therefore Netherlands got Flanders, France got Western Wallonia and Prussia Eastern Wallonia. The restoration of Belgium may be another provision of the Treaty of Frankfurt, but in that case Belgium ought ot get French Flanders as well to make it more viable.
France is getting a truly harsh peace here, probably it was even more stubborn to concede defeat than OTL (maybe Napoleon III was not captured at Sedan, which delays the Republican Revolution and the Commune) and the Italo-Germans had to fight their way through most of France to subdue it; revanchism must have been overwhelming, possibly France went to a rigthtist authoritarian regime sometime in the 70s or 80s; it must have been itching for a war, but too weak until Russia committed to an alliance and declared war about the Balkan mess. It is a little strange that such a weak, isolated France still managed to beat Italy to Tunisia and Germany to Morocco, but maybe Britain pulled weight here and supported French claims as a counterbalance to the Italo-German-Hungarian alliance, and/or the Franco-Russian alliance was already in force and the Triple Alliance chose to back down.
