To be fair, If it wasn't for you and other british members I wouldn't think it was odd. Your years of EU hating and General Dislike of Europe had made how ASB that idea is.
So I have a question, what was the UK like in the 50s? Fallout America was pretty much "The 50s, but with tech that the 50s thought they would have by 2000, and everyone is kinda insane" So I imagine Fallout Britain would be somewhat like 50s britain.
Right, apologies for the delay in replying to this, but my internet literally broke as I was trying to reply to it several days ago, and it has only just been restored. I like lecturing about the UK in the fifties, you see.
Now the UK in the fifties was defined by a number of things. Firstly, everything was scarce; rationing continued after the war and my dad, born in 1952, still remembers some things being rationed in his lifetime. Secondly, that whole national-pulling-together attitude from the war was still around to some extent. When Labour nationalised most of the industries after 1945 they hit the national mood well. People had a relatively high opinion of the government, government-run services and national institutions. Remember George Orwell wrote 1984 in 1948 and was partly inspired by his worry that people were becoming too trusting of the government. It says a lot that the Conservatives, even under the arch anti-Socialist Churchill, accepted that they had to maintain these nationalised industries if they wanted to be elected. It is a strange thing that from 1951 to 1964--so in other words throughout almost all the fifties--the UK was run by the Conservatives, who won three bigger majorities at subsequent elections, something never seen before or since--yet the Conservatives run the country on a more left-wing economic position than Labour did in the Noughties. This was known as the socialist consensus or 'Butskellism'--because Labour Chancellor Hugh Gaitskell and Conservative Chancellor Rab Butler had had basically exactly the same economic policies. I think perhaps that the usual right and left economic positions broke down somewhat due to that whole 'national feeling' I mentioned left over from the war. People like Thatcher (who was already around at the time, remember) were cross that the Conservative leadership acted as though the left had won the debate about economics and that their role was simply to give way gracefully to socialism. Perhaps it can be argued that Thatcher's election in 1979 in part represents how the national feeling of the war had finally started to break down--younger people were around, the sixties had tarnished patriotism, punks, far right, and so on.
The fifties in the UK were also a very optimistic time as far as science, technology and international relations were concerned. Every boy's magazine contained detailed diagrams and statistics about the latest breakthroughs in marvellous new vehicles like helicopters and hovercraft, jet fighters, faster, better, and so on. It's the kind of attitude that programmes like Top Gear try to recapture now. It was a time when you see the stereotypical paleofuture predictions about how science will revolutionise our lives, while failing to realise that society would change (the housewife in her flying silver lemon etc).
In international relations, everyone was convinced that the United Nations were the best thing since sliced bread, conventional nationalism was considered thoroughly discredited by the war, and views on race and colonialism were at this weird halfway stage where (educated) people believed that non-whites had the same potential as whites, but required some stewardship in order to reach it. A lot of people had a fairly naive attitude towards the Eastern Bloc's intentions. Also it was easily the most enthusiastic period for European unity in the UK, so obviously that was the time when they wouldn't let us
in thanks to de Gaulle's veto, as opposed to the other way around.
Because of the rationing and scarcity, and America's period of conspicuous consumption, America was idolised to a ridiculous degree by Britain in this time, and to some extent this has never gone away: if you ask a Briton to come up with a positive vision of America, it will be based on a stereotypical version of the fifties. In fact a lot of "American-themed" things in the UK today basically resemble Fallout itself without the apocalypse part--the fifties turned up to eleven. This would be the hard part for you to incorporate if you want to draw on this, because obviously it makes no sense for the UK to idolise America considering the dire straits America is in in the Fallout universe.
While the 'national feeling' aspect also doesn't translate well to Krall's patchwork of different states, perhaps it could be done as state control and intense patriotism within some of the states, such as the Wiltshire government he mentioned.
Does any of that make sense?