History lover
Banned
This will be based as a timeline rather than as a story or a journal.Just like a map game.
1772 AD: *The british pass the Bill Of The Rights Of The Colonial which grant the colonials of british of irish descent the abillirty to vote for the english parliament.This however anger the french population in Quebec.
*Johann Friedrich Struensee and Caroline Matilda of Wales,the current queen of Denmark,are arrested.Johann is later executerd while Caroline to Hanover.
*The first partition of poland is agreed upon,and executed by Russia,Prussia and Austria.
*The british vessel of Gaspee is burned by Quebecois in Rhode Island.
*Slavery is abolishied in Great Britain and in all the colonies that are able to vote for parliament.
Good god... where to begin...
Vote for the "english" parliament? Huh? Have boroughs been created in North America? What does that mean for the rotten boroughs still existing? "Descent" is also problematic, what if only a parent or grandparent is British/Irish? Aside from "descent" what other requirements are there to vote? Britain still had property restrictions at the time. About the "irish", why wouldn't they vote for members of the Irish Parliament which still existed at this time instead of the "english" one?
This makes sense, only because something like it actually happened.
This makes sense, again only because something like it actually happened.
Gaspee ran aground and was later boarded at night and burned by locals angered by her captain's zealous and competent enforcement of custom duties. The incident had not been planned in any real sense however.
When news of Gaspee's late afternoon grounding down the Bay reached Providence, the Brown brothers and other local magnates were able to form a raiding party, row several miles down the Bay to the vessel, and board her all before dawn.
While the removal of Gaspee or, more accurately, the cessation of her customs activities had been long desired, no one had been plotting to destroy the ship. Instead, the vessel's grounding merely provided the locals with an immediate opportunity to destroy it.
The suggestion that an armed party of Francophone and Catholic strangers could loiter long enough in New`England to identify a customs vessel and then attack and destroy the same is asinine. The idea that rebellious Quebecois would travel as far as New England to mount an attack on agents of the British Crown is also asinine.
Absolutely ASB. Aside from completely ignoring the many events which led up to emancipation in the Empire, the financially strapped Britain of this period wouldn't even be able to contemplate what was the major hurdle for emancipation; compensation to slave holders.
I'm not even going to bother with the rest. This "time line" is little more than a pretty map with little or no thinking behind it.
And it gets worse... Quebec wins a one-year revolution and gains Michigan... Poles aid Ottomans against Russians...
It's like watching a cancer metastasize.
English (Sorry,i meant for british) and Irish descent means everyone with British or Irish blood and live in a mgority British territory (All territories expect QWuebec and the British East India company's territories).
To suggest that people of Irish descent should vote for the Irish parlamient in unpractical.
What will you do with a person with an Irish mother and an English or Welsh father for example?
Also the rest up until 1774 was taken directly from wikipedia expect from the parts about Quebec.
The british had nforced british law by letting the colonials to vote for the english parliament.The regulations on the right to vote are the same as the UK.It is like Israel letting the palestinians to vote for the Knesset,it is obvious they would also enforce israeli law in the palestinian territories.A man with one British/Irish descent have British blood and therefore can vote unless he violate the regulations that were existed in the UK at the time.Universal manhood suffrage with no gender/religious/property restrictions in the colonies but not in Britain? Sure whatever.
I thought so too, which is why I brought it up to point out how poorly thought out this alleged "time line" is.
Indeed. I even brought that up in my post when I wrote: "Descent" is also problematic, what if only a parent or grandparent is British/Irish?
Yes, I noted that the only parts which made sense were those copied from actual history. As for the rest, it's an absolute mess.
Actually it is two year revolution.
But i retcon that.
Two years? That makes all the difference then.
I mean it only took the Thirteen Colonies with a population over ten times larger and an alliance with a European Great Power EIGHT YEARS to do the same and even then they didn't truly gain Michigan until 1815. Apparently Quebec should be able to accomplish all of that much faster because they put gravy on their pomme frites.
It should be child's play for a Quebec of about 100,000 souls - and not all of them French-descended - in only two years to beat Great Britain alone, subjugate Upper Canada and the Maritimes, and grab the Old Northwest, right? Because the British Colonies on Quebec's southern border aren't going to lift a finger when they see those western lands they fought The French & Indian War to claim and fought the OTL's Revolution to maintain fall into the hands of Quebec, aren't they?
That's simply cosmetic. It's like putting a band-aid on an amputation.
Also the settlers in the thirteen colonies saw themselves as english,so what?