Ah so it sounds like the events of the first trilogy are very much carried to their natural conclusions for the most part ?Yes, I did.
In my biased view (freshly read third book colours reminiscences of previous one) world is a simmering cauldron, with quite hot Cold War going on. Also, all kind of governments and factions (mostly in background od the story) try to adopt parts of the future they like, while stopping parts they do not like from existing, and making usual muddle of things.
So any readers have a nice spoiler landed summary ? I'm asking because Wikipedia only has the first trilogy covered .
You mean the original 3 books ?The books do eventually lead to what John BIrmingham has said is another trilogy.
The Ebooks are set in the 1950s, and the new trilogy will take place directly after the end of Stalin's Hammer ParisOh that's good news- so sometime between the 70's and modern day ?
You're probably right,but I like the minor changes in alternate history,like Ho Chi Minh staying in Boston and starting his own restaurant,or the Shah going crazy on the ayatollahs in the fifties or what the nuclear industry looks like with foresight of environmental damage,same as chemical industryIt would be cool if stuff like Newfoundland staying independent happens, but that's the sort of minor butterfly that no one pays attention to.