That was at the start. No campaigns. Specific engagement/battle. Lasts max of 5 days.How are we defining battle? Like Leyte Gulf for example; is it a single battle or is it a campaign composed of at least 4 battles?
That was at the start. No campaigns. Specific engagement/battle. Lasts max of 5 days.How are we defining battle? Like Leyte Gulf for example; is it a single battle or is it a campaign composed of at least 4 battles?
British counterattack at sea? Destroyers and smaller warships in the middle of barges, with damage done by weaponry and big wakes. Crusiers and battle line blasting away on the perimeter. Submarines from both sides firing torpedoes in several directions.Dare I suggest Sea Lion? That is an awful lot of barges.
The RN wouldn't step back from that fight. That would be part of their raison d'etre
British counterattack at sea? Destroyers and smaller warships in the middle of barges, with damage done by weaponry and big wakes. Crusiers and battle line blasting away on the perimeter. Submarines from both sides firing torpedoes in several directions.
I would define it as the manpower out on the waves in the surface ships of both sides. Aircraft specifically designed for naval combat would also count towards the total. Tonnage, weight doesn't concern me too much. But the scenario cannot involve people deciding to build 100 times as many boats as they did IOTL. Too be fair. I'm not anything of a naval historian. Maybe this isn't the best way to measure it? It was the best I could think of.How does one measure largeness? Tonnage of Capital Ships including strike aviation, Cruisers (Battle) and Cruisers (Large)? Inches or mm of weapons 9.2" or greater (summed as calibre per barrel)? Hulls (ship)? Hulls (ship + boat)? Navally oriented aircraft aloft? Engines aloft? Tonnes of TNT equivalent of air carried munition?
It seems to be
With the quibbling about what is "capital" to the battle once one is declared.
- Numbers
- Inches
- Weight
* * *
Post war I'd argue it is area of ocean denied to OPFOR's uncontested use regardless of the method of effect.
yours,
Sam R.
Could you give me a link to your timeline? Sounds really cool!My weird timeline where I had the PoD be the Great People's Revolutionary Hammer (800 megaton nuclear bomb) from For All Time explode over the heads of the Entente armies marshalling for the Hundred Days Offensive, after much shenanigans most of Europe (France, Germany, the Low Countries, Poland, and the former Russian Empire up to the Urals) assembled as a huge socialist federation with massive industrial strength and with the expertise of all those nations built a defensive armada made for keeping the United States and the Royal Navy from being able to get a toehold on the European continent.
GASPDare I suggest Sea Lion? That is an awful lot of barges.
I'm not sure that would be larger then Jutland. Anything post the WNT scrappenings is losing out on a lot of hulls. Moreover, I suspect that it'd be a series of actions; The UK can't exactly deploy their whole fleet to the Caribbean, and the Americans have the whole Pacific to worry about.War Plan Red????
War Plan Red kicks off and both USN & RN fleets meet north of Bermuda!
Wasnt there an e-boat attack on the D-Day landings. Surely that must be the largest battle then - if a bit one sidedGASP
The unspeakable sea mammal!
Advancing the start of World War One is easier than delaying the introduction of dreadnoughts. An Agadir Crisis triggered war would have the war kick off in 1911. That gives Germany 7 dreadnoughts commissioned, all triple expansion powered and the RN 10 dreadnoughts commissioned. Germany would have 3 battlecruisers while the RN would have 3 or 4 I class battlecruisers. With these low number the pre-dreadnoughts would have to be involved in the main fleet actions, and the armoured cruisers would have a bigger role.Maybe the numbers in Jutland could be increased by delaying introduction of Dreadnoughts by a few years [1], so there are more predreadnoughts in use. The Jutland action then requires closer range engagement and more numbers, so it's more like a big Tsushima where the short distances and lower speeds mean once in contact there's little choice but to engage. And if anyone does try to break off, the few dreadnoughts can help the light cruisers run them down.
alt-Jutland becomes far more destructive, uses a few more ships, and everyone there gets fully involved.
[1] Needs some perceived barrier as it was a technology of its time with several countries heading that way at the same time, perhaps preferring secrecy over dominance.
Could you give me a link to your timeline? Sounds really cool!
Wasnt there an e-boat attack on the D-Day landings. Surely that must be the largest battle then - if a bit one sided
Can I offer an alternative? A later War and perhaps delay Dreadnought for a couple of years so we have two years of more & better semi-dreadnoughts and more super-dreadnoughts. A delayed war will not show up the pre-dreadnoughts as floating death-traps until they actually show up. Jutland on steroids?Advancing the start of World War One is easier than delaying the introduction of dreadnoughts. An Agadir Crisis triggered war would have the war kick off in 1911. That gives Germany 7 dreadnoughts commissioned, all triple expansion powered and the RN 10 dreadnoughts commissioned. Germany would have 3 battlecruisers while the RN would have 3 or 4 I class battlecruisers. With these low number the pre-dreadnoughts would have to be involved in the main fleet actions, and the armoured cruisers would have a bigger role.