Thanks for the last change, Tanner151. It's a nice touch that Italy transfers its rights on the Oran region to Spain
Egypt has managed to keep Sudan?
If United Nations will exist after this alt WW2, which will be the permanent members of its Security Council? Indeed, in view that will surely be the main countries of the three ideological alliances (eg: Germany, USA, UK, USSR, China -if it unifies by the forthcoming referendum on Chinese unification, probably observed by UN- Italy and other, could be a Latin American country (otherwise, it could be Spain, for there is some representation of the Spanish-speaking world -after all, France was able to be a permanent member in the OTL Security Council when for almost the entire war was a collaborator state of the III Reich-), Turkey, Free France or an independent India), I support each of these states had a right of veto, but will only be truly effective when one (if the permanent members of UN Security Council are seven) or two (if they are nine) other of the permanent members also exercise their right of veto. That way there would be more room for diplomatic solutions to international conflicts during this rare Cold War.
Will we soon see a world map after the WW2?
PS: I hoped that Hitler had decided the annexation of a larger part of Denmark (Jutland, plus Danish Frisian islands and others islands west of Great Belt/Little Belt), reducing the Danish state to the Baltic islands east of Great Belt/Little Belt -if he not order the full German annexation of Denmark, citing the Aryan/Germanic similarity between both peoples-. Thus Germany had a higher margin to control the entrance to the Baltic Sea and "protect" the Scandinavian countries.
Denmark divided into regions (the island colored in red and marked in a square is Bornholm)
Egypt has managed to keep Sudan?
If United Nations will exist after this alt WW2, which will be the permanent members of its Security Council? Indeed, in view that will surely be the main countries of the three ideological alliances (eg: Germany, USA, UK, USSR, China -if it unifies by the forthcoming referendum on Chinese unification, probably observed by UN- Italy and other, could be a Latin American country (otherwise, it could be Spain, for there is some representation of the Spanish-speaking world -after all, France was able to be a permanent member in the OTL Security Council when for almost the entire war was a collaborator state of the III Reich-), Turkey, Free France or an independent India), I support each of these states had a right of veto, but will only be truly effective when one (if the permanent members of UN Security Council are seven) or two (if they are nine) other of the permanent members also exercise their right of veto. That way there would be more room for diplomatic solutions to international conflicts during this rare Cold War.
Will we soon see a world map after the WW2?
PS: I hoped that Hitler had decided the annexation of a larger part of Denmark (Jutland, plus Danish Frisian islands and others islands west of Great Belt/Little Belt), reducing the Danish state to the Baltic islands east of Great Belt/Little Belt -if he not order the full German annexation of Denmark, citing the Aryan/Germanic similarity between both peoples-. Thus Germany had a higher margin to control the entrance to the Baltic Sea and "protect" the Scandinavian countries.
Denmark divided into regions (the island colored in red and marked in a square is Bornholm)