A New Beginning - Our 1992 Russian Federation
- Thread starter panpiotr
- Start date
-
- Tags
- russia russian federation
They are going up as we took quite pro natal stance, there's also an immigration. But i believe that each third child is a little to much even for Patriarch, especially in country numbering millions and one quite large as Russia. Remember he has entire Russian Ortodox Church to run and even with every third child we are speaking about at least thousands of people.
Chapter Twenty Seven: Wikileaks and The Informational-Psychological War (April 2006 - March 2007)
(Planned Russian Moon base in the future)
In response to the renewed space race with the United States, the Russian government has embarked on a sweeping and ambitious strategy aimed at asserting its dominance and leadership in space exploration. Understanding the critical importance of not lagging behind as it did in previous space endeavors, Russia has committed to a substantial increase in funding for its space program. This decision represents a significant shift, with resources being redirected from military expenditure towards space exploration, capitalizing on the opportunity presented by the USA's focus on conflicts in the Middle East. At the heart of Russia's strategy lies the Moon Base Project. The primary objective is to establish a sustainable human presence on the moon, not only to advance scientific and technological knowledge but also to lay the foundation for future space exploration and colonization endeavors. By concentrating efforts on the moon as a strategic outpost, Russia aims to showcase its unwavering commitment to space exploration and expand its influence beyond the confines of Earth's atmosphere.
To support this ambitious undertaking, Russia intends to revisit and revitalize old space exploration plans that were shelved due to budgetary constraints in previous decades. By updating and modernizing these plans with the latest technological advancements, Russia aims to leverage past research and development efforts, accelerating progress towards its lunar aspirations. The promotion of space conquest ideals from the Soviet era will play a pivotal role in inspiring both national and international talents to join the cause, framing space exploration as a noble endeavor for the betterment of humanity. Concurrently, Russia recognizes the immense potential of investing in robotics technology for space exploration purposes. Emphasizing the importance of robotic systems in paving the way for human conquest of the universe, Russia is prioritizing the development of autonomous systems and robotic vehicles. These sophisticated technologies will be instrumental in scouting, surveying, and preparing lunar terrain for human habitation, complementing Russia's human spaceflight capabilities and enhancing its overall space exploration capabilities.
Furthermore, Russia is actively seeking to attract top-tier talent from both domestic and international sources. With Western powers preoccupied with other concerns, Russia sees an opportune moment to entice skilled scientists, engineers, and space exploration experts to contribute to its space program. Collaborative efforts with other spacefaring nations are also being pursued, with Russia seeking partnerships to share resources, expertise, and technological know-how. Through international cooperation, Russia aims to accelerate progress towards shared objectives in space exploration while fostering a spirit of collaboration and innovation. In summary, Russia's response to the reinvigorated space race is comprehensive and far-reaching. By prioritizing the Moon Base Project, investing in robotics technology, attracting top talent, and promoting international collaboration, Russia is positioning itself as a frontrunner in space exploration. With determination, strategic planning, and a renewed sense of purpose, Russia is poised to achieve significant milestones in humanity's quest to explore and understand the cosmos, shaping the future of space exploration for generations to come.
(Russian made chips and semicondustors challenged the technological domination of the West in those fields)
As Russia earns hundreds of billions of dollars thanks to the ongoing commodities boom, the government is poised to undertake bold and visionary initiatives to assert its dominance in space exploration. With this significant influx of revenue, Russia has the financial means to invest heavily in ambitious economic, industrial, and infrastructure megaprojects. Firstly, recognizing the strategic importance of the Trans-Siberian Railway in facilitating trade with East Asia, the Russian government plans to embark on a comprehensive upgrade of this vital infrastructure. The project aims to modernize existing rail lines, increase capacity, and improve efficiency through the incorporation of high-speed rail technology. By enhancing connectivity between Russia and its Asian neighbors, this initiative seeks to stimulate economic growth and strengthen regional cooperation. Building on Russia's expertise in nuclear technology, the government is committed to expanding its nuclear energy sector. By allocating significant funds to the development of new nuclear power plants and advanced reactor designs, Russia aims to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels and transition towards a more sustainable energy future. This initiative not only addresses the pressing need for clean energy but also positions Russia as a global leader in nuclear technology.
Recognizing the transformative potential of genetic engineering, the Russian government is keen to foster innovation in this rapidly evolving field. By promoting greater freedom and investment in genetic research and testing, Russia seeks to leverage genetic modification to gain a competitive edge in agriculture, medicine, and biotechnology. This initiative underscores Russia's commitment to scientific advancement and technological innovation. With a focus on strengthening the domestic economy, the Russian government plans to reduce its foreign debt burden while simultaneously investing in key industries and infrastructure projects. By reducing reliance on foreign creditors, Russia aims to enhance its economic sovereignty and minimize external influence. At the same time, targeted investments in infrastructure, education, and industry will stimulate economic growth and create new opportunities for Russian businesses and entrepreneurs.
As part of its efforts to modernize transportation infrastructure, Russia intends to establish a nationwide high-speed rail network. This ambitious project will improve connectivity between major cities and regions, enhance passenger comfort and convenience, and promote economic development along rail corridors. By investing in high-speed rail, Russia aims to improve mobility, reduce carbon emissions, and enhance competitiveness in the global economy. Recognizing the importance of soft power in international relations, Russia plans to strategically invest in foreign nations to expand its influence and economic interests. Through targeted investments in key sectors such as energy, infrastructure, and technology, Russia seeks to strengthen ties with strategic partners and increase its presence on the world stage. By leveraging its economic resources, Russia aims to assert itself as a global player and shape the geopolitical landscape in its favor.
To foster innovation and entrepreneurship, Russia plans to implement policies aimed at supporting startups and small businesses. By offering incentives such as tax breaks, reduced bureaucratic barriers, and access to financing, Russia aims to create a conducive environment for business growth and innovation. Additionally, continued investment in the semiconductor industry will bolster Russia's technological capabilities and position it as a leader in cutting-edge technologies. These proposed megaprojects reflect Russia's commitment to advancing its economic, industrial, and technological development in the face of renewed competition in the space race. By investing in key sectors and infrastructure, Russia aims to secure its position as a global powerhouse and assert its leadership in space exploration and beyond.
(Leadership of Rosatom showing President Lukashenko model of nuclear powerplant complex that will be build in Iran)
In a groundbreaking and geopolitically significant development, Russian atomic energy companies, prominently led by Rosatom, have embarked on a strategic collaboration with Iran aimed at the construction of nuclear power plants within the Islamic Republic. This landmark agreement represents a convergence of interests between Russia and Iran, two nations seeking to harness the potential of nuclear energy to address their respective economic, energy security, and developmental needs. The genesis of this historic partnership can be traced back to the early 2000s, when discussions between Russia and Iran regarding nuclear cooperation began to gain momentum. Against the backdrop of Iran's growing energy demands and ambitions to diversify its energy sources beyond fossil fuels, Russian atomic expertise emerged as a natural ally in realizing the country's aspirations for nuclear energy development.
Negotiations between the two nations culminated in a comprehensive agreement outlining the scope and framework of the nuclear collaboration. Central to this agreement is the commitment to construct multiple nuclear power plants across Iran, with Rosatom at the helm of the consortium of Russian companies tasked with overseeing the design, construction, and operation of these facilities. This consortium brings together a formidable array of Russian nuclear engineering, construction, and operational capabilities, bolstered by decades of experience gained from executing similar projects both domestically and abroad. From the outset, the goals of the Russian-Iranian nuclear partnership have been twofold. For Iran, the construction of nuclear power plants represents a strategic imperative to meet the country's burgeoning energy demands, spurred by rapid population growth, urbanization, and industrialization. Moreover, nuclear energy offers Iran a means to reduce its reliance on finite fossil fuel reserves and mitigate the environmental impact associated with traditional energy sources, aligning with broader objectives of sustainable development and environmental stewardship.
For Russia, the collaboration with Iran holds multifaceted strategic significance, extending beyond mere economic considerations. At its core, the partnership reaffirms Russia's status as a global leader in the field of nuclear energy, showcasing the country's technological prowess, engineering capabilities, and commitment to international cooperation. By exporting its nuclear expertise to Iran, Russia not only cultivates lucrative business opportunities for its nuclear industry but also strengthens its geopolitical influence and strategic presence in the Middle East and beyond. However, the Russian-Iranian nuclear partnership has not been immune to controversy and skepticism, particularly in light of Iran's tumultuous history with the international community over its nuclear program. Critics have raised concerns regarding the potential proliferation risks associated with Iran's nuclear ambitions, fearing that the construction of nuclear power plants could provide Tehran with the technological know-how and infrastructure necessary for the development of nuclear weapons.
In response to these concerns, both Russia and Iran have reaffirmed their commitment to upholding stringent safeguards and monitoring mechanisms to ensure the peaceful nature of the nuclear collaboration. This includes adherence to international non-proliferation norms, compliance with safeguards agreements overseen by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and transparent cooperation with the international community to allay any suspicions surrounding Iran's nuclear intentions. As construction progresses on the first of the planned nuclear power plants in Iran, the Russian-Iranian nuclear partnership stands as a testament to the transformative potential of international cooperation in the realm of nuclear energy. Beyond the realm of geopolitics, the collaboration holds the promise of catalyzing economic development, fostering technological innovation, and advancing the shared goal of a more sustainable and resilient energy future for both Russia and Iran, and indeed, the broader global community.
(President Bush demanded from President Lukashenko and Russian nuclear companies immidiate stop on works in Iran)
In response to the burgeoning collaboration between Russian atomic companies and Iran in the construction of nuclear power plants, President George W. Bush issued a stern and unequivocal statement. With a measured tone reflecting the gravity of the situation, President Bush addressed the American public and the international community, articulating the United States' stance on the matter.
"In light of recent developments concerning the nuclear cooperation between Russia and Iran, the United States cannot stand idly by while the proliferation of nuclear technology threatens global security and stability. The construction of nuclear power plants in Iran by Russian atomic companies, including Rosatom, represents a direct challenge to the principles of non-proliferation and poses a grave risk to international peace and security." President Bush emphasized the need for swift and decisive action to address the situation, outlining a series of demands aimed at halting further progress on the Russian-Iranian nuclear projects. "I call upon the Russian government to immediately cease all activities related to the construction of nuclear power plants in Iran. Any further collaboration in this regard will be met with serious consequences, including the imposition of sanctions and the enactment of a comprehensive embargo on the Russian nuclear sector."
The President underscored the importance of upholding international norms and obligations in preventing the spread of nuclear weapons and technology. "The United States remains committed to the global non-proliferation regime and will not tolerate efforts to undermine its integrity. We urge Russia to reconsider its course of action and to join us in our efforts to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons capabilities." President Bush reiterated the United States' willingness to engage in diplomatic dialogue with Russia to address the issue, but made it clear that the stakes were high and the consequences of inaction severe. "We stand ready to work with our Russian counterparts in finding a peaceful and diplomatic resolution to this matter. However, let there be no mistake: the proliferation of nuclear technology to rogue regimes such as Iran will not be tolerated, and the United States will take all necessary measures to uphold global security and safeguard the interests of the international community." With his resolute words echoing across the diplomatic corridors of power, President Bush signaled America's unwavering commitment to preventing nuclear proliferation and maintaining peace and security in an increasingly complex and uncertain world.
(Gaza strip under heavy Israeli bombardment)
The 2006 Gaza–Israel conflict, known in Israel as Operation Summer Rains was a series of battles between Palestinian militants and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) during summer 2006, prompted by the capture of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit by Palestinian militants on 25 June 2006. Large-scale conventional warfare occurred in the Gaza Strip, starting on 28 June 2006, which was the first major ground operation in the Gaza Strip since Israel's unilateral disengagement plan was implemented between August and September 2005. Israel's stated objectives in Operation Summer Rains were to suppress the firing of Qassam rockets from Gaza into the western Negev, and to secure the release of Corporal Gilad Shalit, who had been captured by Palestinian militants. Shalit was captured amid a background of violence between the IDF and Palestinian militant groups since the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. According to statistics published by the Israeli government, 757 missiles from Gaza hit Israel between the withdrawal and the end of June 2006. The IDF had responded with artillery fire and air raids. During the operation, the pace of both rocket fire and shelling increased dramatically, and the IDF mounted numerous ground incursions into the Gaza Strip targeting militant groups and their infrastructure, including smuggling tunnels in the Philadelphi Corridor. On the first day of the conflict, Israel also bombed the only electrical power plant in the Gaza Strip. Hamas sought the release of a large number of Palestinian prisoners held by Israel in exchange for Shilat. Publicly, Israel categorically rejected any such offers, but in August it was reported that negotiations were held with Egypt acting as mediator. However, the negotiations broke down as Israel wasn't willing to release as many prisoners as Hamas wanted. Operation Summer Rains was followed by Operation "Autumn Clouds", launched on November 1.
(Additional troops bolstering American presence in Iceland)
The expansion and modernization of the Iceland Defense Force (IDF) by the United States represents a significant strategic initiative aimed at bolstering regional security and defense capabilities in the North Atlantic region. The partnership between the USA and Iceland dates back to the establishment of the Iceland Defense Force in 1951, following the conclusion of World War II and the onset of the Cold War. In recent years, the USA has intensified its efforts to enhance the effectiveness and readiness of the IDF through a comprehensive modernization program. This program encompasses various elements, including infrastructure upgrades, technological advancements, and joint training exercises, designed to strengthen Iceland's defense capabilities and reinforce its role as a key NATO ally in the North Atlantic region. One of the primary objectives of the modernization program is to improve the operational capabilities of the IDF in response to evolving security challenges, including emerging threats in the Arctic and the North Atlantic. To achieve this goal, the USA has invested in the expansion and enhancement of military facilities in Iceland, including Keflavik Air Base, which serves as a critical hub for air operations and surveillance in the region. At Keflavik Air Base, the USA has deployed advanced surveillance and reconnaissance assets, such as airborne early warning aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles, to enhance situational awareness and monitoring of maritime and aerial activities in the North Atlantic. These capabilities enable the IDF to detect and respond effectively to potential threats, including maritime piracy, illegal fishing, and transnational organized crime.
In addition to infrastructure upgrades, the USA has also focused on modernizing the equipment and capabilities of the IDF through the provision of advanced military hardware and technology. This includes the deployment of state-of-the-art aircraft, naval vessels, and ground-based systems, equipped with the latest sensors, communications, and weapons systems to enhance the IDF's ability to defend Iceland's territorial integrity and sovereignty. Furthermore, the modernization program emphasizes joint training and interoperability between the IDF and US forces, as well as other NATO allies, through regular joint exercises and training initiatives. These activities not only enhance operational readiness and effectiveness but also strengthen cooperation and coordination among allied forces in the North Atlantic region, contributing to overall regional stability and security. The expansion and modernization of the Iceland Defense Force by the United States underscore the enduring commitment of both nations to collective defense and the preservation of peace and security in the North Atlantic. Through strategic investments in infrastructure, technology, and training, the USA is helping to ensure that Iceland remains a capable and reliable partner in the NATO alliance, capable of meeting the challenges of the 21st century security environment.
(British troops in Norway strenghtening NATO's northern flank)
The expansion of military presence in Norway by the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and France represents a concerted effort to counteract the resurgent influence of Russia in the North Atlantic and Arctic regions. As Russia asserts its military presence and strategic interests in the region, NATO allies are intensifying their cooperation and collective defense efforts to ensure the security and stability of the North Atlantic alliance. In recent years, the geopolitical landscape in the North Atlantic has undergone significant shifts, driven by Russia's assertive actions, including increased military exercises, deployments, and infrastructure development in the Arctic and Northern Europe. These developments have raised concerns among NATO members about Russia's intentions and capabilities in the region, prompting a coordinated response to safeguard shared interests and deter potential aggression. The United States, as the leading NATO member and a key security guarantor in the North Atlantic, has played a central role in expanding military presence in Norway. Building on existing bilateral and multilateral agreements, the USA has bolstered its military footprint in Norway through the rotation of troops, deployment of advanced military assets, and enhancement of joint training and exercises with Norwegian forces.
Canada, the United Kingdom, and France, as fellow NATO allies, have also increased their military presence in Norway as part of broader efforts to reinforce collective defense in the North Atlantic. These countries have deployed troops, aircraft, and naval vessels to Norway, contributing to joint operations, exercises, and training initiatives aimed at enhancing interoperability and readiness among allied forces. One of the focal points of the expanded military presence in Norway is the development of joint operating bases and facilities capable of supporting a range of military operations and contingencies. These bases serve as hubs for multinational cooperation and coordination, facilitating the rapid deployment and sustainment of allied forces in the region. Furthermore, the expansion of military presence in Norway involves the deployment of advanced surveillance, reconnaissance, and early warning capabilities to enhance situational awareness and monitoring of potential threats in the North Atlantic and Arctic. This includes the deployment of intelligence-gathering assets, such as reconnaissance aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles, and maritime patrol aircraft, to detect and deter Russian military activities in the region.
Joint exercises and training programs conducted in Norway serve as vital mechanisms for enhancing the readiness and effectiveness of allied forces in the North Atlantic. These exercises simulate a range of scenarios, including maritime interdiction, air defense, and amphibious operations, to ensure that NATO forces are prepared to respond effectively to any contingency or crisis. The expansion of military presence in Norway by the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and France underscores the commitment of NATO allies to collective defense and the preservation of peace and security in the North Atlantic region. By strengthening cooperation, interoperability, and deterrence capabilities, allied forces are sending a clear message of unity and resolve in the face of emerging security challenges posed by a resurgent Russia in the north.
(Allpowerful FSB Director Vladimir Putin)
In late 2006, against the backdrop of escalating tensions between Russia and the West, FSB Director Vladimir Putin and esteemed political scientist Igor Panarin convened in a discreet meeting, shrouded in secrecy and cloaked in the shadows of geopolitical intrigue. The atmosphere crackled with anticipation as these two formidable figures, each wielding their unique blend of intellect and influence, embarked on a clandestine endeavor that would send shockwaves reverberating across the global stage. With a shared recognition of the West's formidable dominance in information warfare and psychological manipulation, Putin and Panarin saw an opening to challenge the status quo and assert Russia's influence in the corridors of power. Drawing on Panarin's deep understanding of psychology and geopolitical dynamics, coupled with Putin's decades of experience in intelligence and statecraft, the duo began charting a course for a bold and audacious campaign that would come to be known as the Informational-Psychological War against the West.
Their strategy, meticulously crafted behind closed doors, encompassed a dizzying array of tactics, ranging from covert cyber operations and disinformation campaigns to targeted influence efforts aimed at exploiting societal fault lines and amplifying existing divisions within Western democracies. Through a seamless integration of traditional espionage tradecraft and cutting-edge technological capabilities, Putin and Panarin sought to infiltrate the hearts and minds of Western citizens, sowing seeds of doubt and discord that would ultimately undermine the very foundations of Western unity and cohesion. As the campaign unfolded, the halls of power in Western capitals trembled with trepidation, as policymakers and intelligence analysts scrambled to decipher the enigmatic maneuvers of their Russian adversaries. Putin and Panarin's masterful orchestration of the Informational-Psychological War cast a dark shadow over the once-unassailable pillars of Western democracy, leaving policymakers grappling with the daunting task of confronting an invisible enemy that lurked in the murky depths of cyberspace and psychological manipulation.
But for every move made by the West to counter Russian aggression, Putin and Panarin responded with a calculated counterstroke, exploiting vulnerabilities and exploiting opportunities with surgical precision. The battleground expanded beyond traditional borders, encompassing the vast expanse of the internet and the far-reaching tendrils of social media, where narratives were crafted, perceptions molded, and truth itself became a casualty in the relentless pursuit of geopolitical supremacy. As the years passed, the Informational-Psychological War evolved into a protracted struggle for dominance in the information age, reshaping the contours of global politics and redrawing the boundaries of power in a world gripped by uncertainty and upheaval. For Putin and Panarin, the campaign was a testament to their vision and resolve, a bold gambit to challenge the established order and assert Russia's rightful place on the world stage. And as the shadows lengthened and the stakes grew ever higher, the echoes of their clandestine meeting reverberated across time and space, leaving an indelible mark on the annals of history.
In early 2007, tensions between Russia and Poland reached a boiling point as a bitter energy dispute erupted, casting a shadow over their bilateral relations and threatening to disrupt the stability of the wider European energy landscape. At the heart of the conflict lay divergent interests, historical grievances, and geopolitical ambitions, as both nations jostled for dominance in the strategic arena of energy supply and distribution. The dispute centered primarily on natural gas, a vital resource for both countries' economies and a key component of Europe's energy security. Poland, wary of its historical reliance on Russian energy imports and eager to assert its independence, sought to diversify its energy sources and reduce its dependence on Moscow. To this end, Poland embarked on ambitious initiatives to explore alternative energy routes and strengthen its partnerships with Western allies, particularly the United States and European Union member states.
In contrast, Russia, keen to maintain its status as a dominant energy supplier to Europe and preserve its influence over its former satellite states, viewed Poland's efforts with suspicion and hostility. The Kremlin, under the leadership of President Alexander Lukashenko, perceived Poland's energy diversification efforts as a direct challenge to its geopolitical interests and sought to exert pressure on Warsaw to maintain the status quo. The dispute escalated rapidly as Russia threatened to cut off natural gas supplies to Poland, citing alleged contractual breaches and unpaid debts. Poland, in turn, accused Russia of using energy as a political weapon and manipulating prices to exert undue influence over its neighbors. The standoff sparked fears of a potential energy crisis in Europe, with other countries closely monitoring the situation and bracing for potential disruptions to their own energy supplies.
Amidst escalating tensions, diplomatic efforts to resolve the dispute faltered, with both sides digging in their heels and refusing to back down. The European Union, anxious to avoid a wider energy crisis and protect the integrity of its internal energy market, intervened as a mediator, urging Russia and Poland to find a mutually acceptable solution. As the standoff persisted, the energy dispute between Russia and Poland underscored the complex interplay of geopolitics, economics, and energy security in the region. It served as a stark reminder of the enduring tensions between East and West and the challenges inherent in Europe's reliance on Russian energy exports. Ultimately, the resolution of the dispute would require careful negotiation, compromise, and a willingness on both sides to prioritize stability and cooperation over short-term political gains.
In the dynamic and often opaque world of global politics, the emergence of WikiLeaks in the early 2000s represented a seismic shift in the landscape of information dissemination and government transparency. Founded by Australian activist Julian Assange in 2006, WikiLeaks swiftly evolved into a groundbreaking platform designed to disrupt conventional power structures, challenge entrenched secrecy, and empower whistleblowers to expose wrongdoing on a scale previously unseen. At its inception, WikiLeaks operated with a small, dedicated team of volunteers driven by a shared vision of accountability and openness. They worked tirelessly to develop a robust technical infrastructure capable of securely receiving, verifying, and disseminating leaked documents from sources around the world. Assange, with his unwavering commitment to radical transparency and freedom of information, became the public face of the organization, advocating for a new paradigm of information sharing that transcended national borders and political boundaries. In 2007, WikiLeaks made its first major splash on the global stage with the release of a cache of classified documents exposing corruption and malfeasance within the Kenyan government. The revelations sent shockwaves through the corridors of power, igniting public outrage and sparking calls for accountability. As governments scrambled to contain the fallout and discredit the whistleblowers behind the leaks, WikiLeaks emerged as a potent force for truth and transparency, emboldening others to come forward with their own revelations of misconduct and abuse of power.
Buoyed by its early success, WikiLeaks expanded its scope and ambition, attracting a diverse network of sources, supporters, and detractors from across the political spectrum. The organization's pioneering approach to transparency and information activism resonated with whistleblowers disillusioned by the limitations of traditional channels for exposing wrongdoing. Yet, it also drew fierce criticism and backlash from governments, intelligence agencies, and powerful vested interests determined to preserve their secrecy and control over sensitive information. In the years that followed, WikiLeaks continued to make headlines with a series of high-profile leaks, including the release of classified U.S. military and diplomatic cables in 2010. These disclosures, which exposed a wide range of abuses, from war crimes to diplomatic duplicity, triggered a global firestorm of controversy and debate. Assange and WikiLeaks found themselves at the center of a swirling maelstrom of legal battles, cyber attacks, and diplomatic pressure as they sought to defend their mission and protect their sources. Yet, amidst the tumult and adversity, WikiLeaks remained steadfast in its commitment to its founding principles. Assange and his team continued to champion transparency, accountability, and freedom of information, even as they faced mounting legal threats and personal hardships. Their unwavering dedication to shining a light on the darkest corners of power ensured that WikiLeaks would leave an indelible mark on the annals of history, reshaping the discourse around government transparency and the role of the media in holding power to account.
The Siberian orange snow of 2007 was an anomalous phenomenon that occurred in early February 2007. Beginning on 31 January 2007, an orange-tinted snow fell across an area of 1,500 square kilometres (580 sq mi) in Omsk Oblast, Siberian Federal District, Russia, approximately 2,300 km (1,400 mi) from Moscow, as well as into the neighboring Tomsk and Tyumen Oblasts. It was unclear what caused the orange snow. Speculation ranged from pollutants to a sandstorm in neighboring Kazakhstan. The orange snow was malodorous, oily to the touch, and reported to contain four times the normal level of iron. Though mostly orange, some of the snow was red or yellow. It affected an area with about 27,000 residents. It was originally speculated that it was caused by industrial pollution, a rocket launch or even a nuclear accident. It was later determined that the snow was non-toxic; however, people in the region were advised not to use the snow or allow animals to feed upon it. Colored snow is uncommon in Russia but not unheard of, as there have been many cases of black, blue, green and red snowfall. This orange snow may have been caused by a heavy sandstorm in neighboring Kazakhstan. Tests on the snow revealed numerous sand and clay dust particles, which were blown into Russia in the upper stratosphere. The speculation that the coloration was caused by a rocket launch from Baikonur in Kazakhstan was later dismissed, as the last launch before the event took place on 18 January 2007. Russia's environmental watchdog originally claimed that the colored snowfall was caused by industrial pollution, such as "waste from metallurgical plants." It stated that the snow contained four times the normal quantities of acids, nitrates, and iron. However, it would be nearly impossible to pinpoint a culprit if pollution were the cause, as there are various industries nearby, such as the city of Omsk, which is a center of the oil industry in Russia.
Last edited:
1. Russian legislative elections of 2007, who should become the Prime Minister of Russia:
A) Boris Nemtsov;
B) Elvira Nabiullina;
C) Garry Kasparov.
2. Please write down, how should the Russian government react to the ultimatum made by President Bush?
3. Please write down, how should the Russian government deal with ongoing energy conflict with Poland?
4. Please write down, how should the Russian government react to ongoing armed conflict between Israel against Hamas in Gaza Strip and Hezbollah in Lebanon?
5. Please write down, if the Russian government should use Wikileaks to discredit American and other Western governments on the global stage?
A) Boris Nemtsov;
B) Elvira Nabiullina;
C) Garry Kasparov.
2. Please write down, how should the Russian government react to the ultimatum made by President Bush?
3. Please write down, how should the Russian government deal with ongoing energy conflict with Poland?
4. Please write down, how should the Russian government react to ongoing armed conflict between Israel against Hamas in Gaza Strip and Hezbollah in Lebanon?
5. Please write down, if the Russian government should use Wikileaks to discredit American and other Western governments on the global stage?
We need to make the USA back off by threating them with nukes if they DARE try to keep us away from Iran
Art Vandelay
Banned
1) B, the only non-liberal
2) be clear that America has no right to dictate the actions of Russia. That said, talks shouldn't be off the table, but it should be clear we're not giving Iran nukes. Basically, "we're not giving them nukes, stfu and mind your own business". This sort of thing is why I say we should have as much autarky as we can, so we can be as sanction-proof as possible
3) if Poland doesn't want to buy our stuff we can't force them. It sure would be a shame if we couldn't send gas through Poland any more cause of their intransigence, wouldn't it?
4) why do we have to do anything, Israel is in the American camp and we've been fighting jihadists for years, let them kill each other
5) of course we should, what a silly question
2) be clear that America has no right to dictate the actions of Russia. That said, talks shouldn't be off the table, but it should be clear we're not giving Iran nukes. Basically, "we're not giving them nukes, stfu and mind your own business". This sort of thing is why I say we should have as much autarky as we can, so we can be as sanction-proof as possible
3) if Poland doesn't want to buy our stuff we can't force them. It sure would be a shame if we couldn't send gas through Poland any more cause of their intransigence, wouldn't it?
4) why do we have to do anything, Israel is in the American camp and we've been fighting jihadists for years, let them kill each other
5) of course we should, what a silly question
It looks like our honeymoon period has ended, and it's time for divorce. I have said multiple times that whatever we do, the clash with the USA is inevitable, and now they have broken the mask of support completely.
Art Vandelay
Banned
Don't we have nationalists we can put in charge? Either that or we'll have to do some "dEmOcRaTiC bAcKsLiDiNg", which would be better than becoming just another cog in the globalist economy. Russia has the capacity to be basically self-sufficient, and we should be so we can flip DC the bird more easily
Exactly why we need to avoid dependency
Let’s expose the world that the people they are evil as the people they are invading and make the USA even more unstable and the many war crimes the USA has done in the past
I do think that we should expose more of USA war crimes and all that, but you people need to know too that if we do encourage this the chance for leaks to happen in Russia will rise too, like we aren't the most squek clean of corruption in this world, but yes we need to expose them to and force their own people to think about the things that their own goverment do, its the same old technique that for us to win this diplomatic attack that the USA are doing, it is needed to gain the Hearts and Minds of the jurie that is the people of the West.
Last edited:
That and we can and are increasing trade with Asia by India and China, and with the creation of BRICS forming a economic cooperation that will grant us more resources too.
T
Try to respond diplomatically to make ourselves look good and make it so that the US push be meet with major propaganda to discredit US actions in Iran.
If at all possible become dominant in whatever field of energy or energy production Poland is going into. By that I mean if Poland is moving towards gas then we should become the number one manufacturer of gas based equipment. If poland is going renewable we should do the same. Make is so Poland continues to be dependent on us even if they try to become energy independent.
Stay as far away from the conflict as possible. Push for diplomatic talks and peace but don't do anything else.
We should be careful here as the misinformation campaign might also be seen by our own people who will begin to believe in conspiracies and misinformation. We might lose any control over the information flow and let other actors both within and without to take advantage of the situation.
And for the Poland crises do you guys think that we could use some cooperation with the Nations that have a claim in Baltic Ocean like Finland and Sweden, like OTL Russia use the baltic to transport Oil to Europe or just pass thought Ukraine, Slovakia and Czech to reach Germany, like look at this 2006 map with both Natural Gas and Oil pipeline, like how will the infrastructure that are already there count into the program because we will not just abandom billions of dollars of Oil pipeline there
And in the Diplomatic part with Bush, we don't want to lose Iran here but and we still aren't ready for a USA+Europe sanctions if things come to shove, but remember guys that in the past we heavily focused into being the prime Oil producer with us winning the deal with getting the USA first, and with this we do have a degree of power here still the thing is we don't want to force the US to stop buying our oil because it will be bad for us and good for the Saudi competition, so here i can see us forcing the issue by bringing that the US want a monopoly on the Nuclear Energy sector and will actively try to harm any other countrie to gain their own Nuclear power plants because this will badly affect the Petro-Dollar and others policies that made the US dependent on the Oil to control the global currency, and using this power on poorer or less developed countries by making it the only way to get Oil a very reliable way to generate energy only available in the US Dollar currency(here i'm doing a strech because i think that we sell thing with rubes our own currency to strengh it against the Dollar) and with this long ass explanation that is why they have been focused so strongly in the Middle East as it is a place with a lot of Oil were there currency is currently tied and why we need to increase the prolification of Nuclear Energy is to stop the Imperialistic USA of oppresing countries that want to develop their own cities and factories with the power output of a Nuclear power plant as a single one would generate a enourmous amount that would help them grow more.
PS: I will say damm this was the largest time i used on thinking how and explain the why we should do something on a Reply kek, and really the guys that did that Anti-Nuclear campain write-in was a genius as this really fuck with the US by paiting them as a Greedy person by locking the revolutionary Nuclear Power, and with us in the foreplace of Nuclear anything, any dip on Oil sells will be null as more and more countries try and turn Nuclear, we will still gain money as hopefully they will turn to us for building their own Energy Sources
PS: I will say damm this was the largest time i used on thinking how and explain the why we should do something on a Reply kek, and really the guys that did that Anti-Nuclear campain write-in was a genius as this really fuck with the US by paiting them as a Greedy person by locking the revolutionary Nuclear Power, and with us in the foreplace of Nuclear anything, any dip on Oil sells will be null as more and more countries try and turn Nuclear, we will still gain money as hopefully they will turn to us for building their own Energy Sources