A Martian stranded on Earth (Tesla Edition)

This is really fascinating. I'm just curious, how much of Bakhmetiev's story is from OTL and how much is your invention?

It is all pretty much OTL until 1913. I only made the following changes:

1. There was no Fydodrov Society, but he was welcomed back to Russia with the same enthusiasm in OTL regardless. He even found like minded people who were interested in his cryonic experiments and some volunteers to be frozen which brought him in conflict with his colleagues.

2. He used bats instead of hamsters. Unfortunately the only thing I could find about these experiments was that he considered them to be a success. There was just more and better material on hamster.

3. While getting things really started in OTL's 1913 he suddenly died of an aneurysm which obviously doesn't happen in my timeline.
 
Last edited:
A Knight in Sour Armor
A Knight in Sour Armor

Childish Fears

One daydream that almost all of us had is to be a hero. The heroes of our daydreams vary as we grow and so do our ideas of what distinguishes a heroes from everyone else. Our ideas develop and become more sophisticated. One of my earliest ideas of a hero was that of the white knight. My father trough a staunch model socialist in all other aspects of life had a great fondness of western medieval fantasy, such as the epic tales of King Arthur. Well hidden from any visitors who might belittle his taste, he kept an entire collection of Alexander Grin's books hidden in a special cupboard, as well as anything else that could fulfill his craving for fantastic escapism.

ZEY6X.jpg

Alexander Grin

So, it is not surprising that he was overjoyed when he read an article written by the “Commissar of Enlightenment ” Lunarchasky himself praising Richard Wagner on the 50th anniversary of his death:

"We speak often and justly of the hypnotising, enchanting power of Wagner’s music. No other composer before Wagner had burst upon the listeners’ perception with such a cascade of sound, with such a broad river of harmony, with such poignant melodies. Wagner himself called his music an endless melody. This may be understood not only in the direct sense, i.e., in the sense of a continuously unrolling musical canvas, but in the sense that Wagner’s music seems to create an invisible magnetic field that extends throughout the universe, and penetrates to the very soul of the listener.
The thunder and clashing of his cymbals, his colossal ensembles, his unisons, which catch one up and carry one off – the entire well-planned whirlwind of sound is staggering. However, Wagner is nearly as powerful when he wants to be winning, when he creeps up to our subconscious unawares. Then he uses the most delicate of skeleton keys to make his way into the very depths of the human heart.
When they say that Wagner was, first and foremost, a man of iron will, that he craved for power above all, one cannot but agree. Indeed, music to him is like an assembly of spirits which he marshals and sends marching forward, to win millions of human souls for him. (Pravda 1933) [1]

Whenever somebody would take offense in his taste from now on, he could always refer to Lunacharsky's thoughts. Who in his right mind would question the socialist credentials of Bogdanov's right hand?

So as you can imagine my bedtime stories were filled with evil dragons and heroic knights slaying them. Literal knights in shining armor were my idea of true heroes. However, once I grew up one particular difficulty arose again and again. How do you identify a hero in a world without dragons, without magic or clear cut villains? A world that is neither black nor white. A world filled with gray places. One of those places was and to a certain extend still is the Lubyanka. Whenever I had to cross the Lubyanka Square I always got the urge to move faster, not too fast thou, I didn't want to look suspicious.

I can't really explain what made me feel so uneasy about this place. Many things may have contributed. One of my earliest encounters with the Lubyanka was a very indirect one but nevertheless it left its mark. When I was around ten years old my parents had guests over at night and I couldn't sleep so I sneaked downstairs from my room and sat down far enough from the door of the living room that nobody would notice me. I was careful not to make any noise. It was fun sitting there, listening to the adults talking about strange and sometimes sexually crude stuff. All good material to impress my friends in school with the forbidden things I knew, to show them how mature I already was. The atmosphere was very relaxed, music played from the radio the entire time. I remember one song in particular, it was Ol' Man River by Paul Robeson. There was something mysterious about this song, a foreign language I never heard before until this point. I still can get lost listening to Robeson full-bodied and sonorous voice singing.

Somebody began telling jokes and other friends followed. I don't know who asked '"What is the tallest building in Moscow ?" but suddenly everybody became silent and uneasy for a moment. Then everybody was chatting again as if nothing ever happened.
Maybe I was a little to sensitive as a child, but the question and the peoples reaction to it didn't leave me alone. Things weren't helped by the fact that I was a terrible curious child as well. I really wanted to know the answer to the question.
Asking my parents might have tipped them off that I stayed awake, so I asked my teacher instead. She should know the answer I thought, teachers have to know all kinds of things after all. The answer I got wasn't obviously the punch line to the joke but a straight answer. The tallest building in Moscow she knew would have to be the newly erected Tatlin Tower, the new seat of the Interkom [2]. It was all over the news at the time.

For all who are curious by now, the punch line is "The Lubyanka since you can see Siberia from the basement." A harmless little joke, at least in the mid thirties, but the memory of the Class War and the Cheka was still lingering. A few years ago I realized it was silly to still get worrisome in front of the Lubyanka so I confronted my fears and walked slowly up to statue in the central place.

SFfMx.jpg


There on his pedestal he was standing "Iron Felix" Dzerzhinsky. On a little, carefully polished silver plate was written "Felix Dzerzhinsky: Hero of the Sovetunio". Once again I was confronted with this nagging question. What is a hero? Was he one? First here a the facts about Dzerzhinsky that are public knowledge...

The Life of Felix Dzerzhinky

Felix Dzerzhinsky was born into a purported Polish szlachta (noble) family of the Samson coat of arms on 11 September 1877. As a youngster Dzerzhinsky was fluent in three languages: Polish, Russian and Hebrew. He attended the Russian gymnasium at Vilnius 1887–95. One of the older students at this gymnasium was the future commandeer of Poland's reactionary forces Józef Piłsudski.
Even after his release from the hard labour camp Piłsudski recalled without hesitation that Dzerzhinsky "distinguished himself as a student with delicacy and modesty. He was rather tall, thin and demure, making the impression of an ascetic with the face of an icon. ... Tormented or not, this is an issue history will clarify; in any case this person did not know how to lie."

Two months before graduating, Dzerzhinsky was expelled from the gymnasium for "revolutionary activity". He had joined a Marxist group, the Union of Workers and became later one of the founders of Social Democracy in the Kingdom of Poland and Lithuania in 1899. He spent a large part of his early life in various prisons. He was sent to Kovno, to take advantage of the arrest of the Polish Socialist Party branch. He worked in a book-binding factory and set up an illegal press.
As an organizer of a shoemaker's strike, Dzerzhinsky was arrested for "criminal agitation among the Kovno workers" and the police files from this time state that: "Felix Dzerzhinsky, considering his views, convictions and personal character, will be very dangerous in the future, capable of any crime."

He was arrested for his revolutionary activities, sent to Siberia, but escaped two times. He then traveled to Berlin and met with Rosa Luxemburg and Leo Jogiches, two prominent leaders of the Polish Social Democratic movement at the time. Dzerzhinsky went to Switzerland where his fiancée Julia Goldman was undergoing treatment for tuberculosis. She died in his arms on 4 June 1904. Her illness and death depressed him, and in letters to his sister, Dzerzhinsky explained that he no longer saw any meaning for his life. That changed with the Russian Revolution of 1905 as Dzerzhinsky was involved with work again. After the revolution failed, he was again jailed, this time by the Okhrana. He later escaped after which he spent much time abroad, and together with Jogiches reorganized the party. In many ways the party began to be more similar philosophically to the Bolshevik faction of the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party.
Back in Kraków in 1910 Dzerzhinsky married party member Zofia Muszkat, who was already pregnant. A month later she was arrested and she gave birth to their son Janek in Pawiak prison. In 1911 Zofia Dzerzhinska was sentenced to permanent Siberian exile, and she left the child with his father. Dzerzhinsky saw his son for the first time in March 1912 in Warsaw. In attending the welfare of his child, Dzerzhinsky repeatedly exposed himself to the danger of arrest.

On one occasion, Dzerzhinsky narrowly escaped an ambush that the police had prepared at the apartment of his father-in-law. Dzerzhinsky remained in Warshaw to direct the Social Democratic Party, while considering his continued freedom "only a game of the Okhrana". The Okhrana, however, was not playing a game; Dzerzhinsky simply was a master of conspiratorial techniques and was therefore extremely difficult to find. A police file from this time says: "Dzerzhinsky continued to lead the [Social Democratic] party and at the same time he directed party work here [in Warsaw], he led strikes, he published appeals to workers ... and he traveled on party matters to Łódź and Kraków". The police however were unable to arrest Dzerzhinsky until the end of 1912, when they found the apartment where he lived, by the name of Władysław Ptasiński

Dzerzhinsky would spend the next four and one-half years in czarist prisons, first at the notorious Tenth Pavilion of the Warsaw Citadel. When the Great War began in 1914, all political prisoners were relocated from Warsaw into Russia proper. Dzerzhinsky was taken initially to Oryol. He was very concerned about the fate of his wife and son, with whom he did not have any communication. Moreover, Dzerzhinsky was beaten frequently by the Russian prison guards, which caused the permanent disfigurement of his jaw and mouth. In 1916 Dzerzhinsky was moved to the Moscow Butyrka prison, where he was soon hospitalized because the chains that he was forced to wear had caused severe cramps in his legs. Despite the prospects of amputation, Dzerzhinsky recovered and was put to labor sewing military uniforms.

Felix Dzerzhinsky was freed from Butyrka after the March Revolution of 1917. Soon after his release, Dzerzhinsky's goal was to organize Polish refugees in Russia and then go back to Poland and fight for the revolution there, writing to his wife: "together with these masses we will return to Poland after the war and become one whole".
However, he remained in Moscow where he joined the Bolshevik party, writing to his comrades that "the Bolshevik party organization is the only Social Democratic organization of the proletariat, and if we were to stay outside of it, then we would find ourselves outside of the proletarian revolutionary struggle".

Already in April he entered the Moscow Committee of the Bolsheviks and soon thereafter was elected to the Executive Committee of the Moscow Soveto. Dzerzhinsky endorsed Bogdanov's New Society Tract, demanding uncompromising opposition to the Russian Provisional Government, the transfer of all political authority to the sovetoj, and the immediate withdrawal of Russia from the war. Dzerzhinsky was elected subsequently to the Bolshevik Central Committee at the Socialist Party Congress in late July.
He then moved from Moscow to Petrograd to begin his new responsibilities. In Petrograd, Dzerzhinsky participated in the crucial session of the Central Committee in November and he strongly endorsed Bogdanov's demands for the immediate preparation of a rebellion, after which Felix Dzerzhinsky had an active role with the Military Revolutionary Committee during the November Revolution. With the acquisition of power by the Bolsheviks, Dzerzhinsky eagerly assumed responsibility for making security arrangements at the Smolny Institute where the Bolsheviks had their headquarters.

2JHYo.jpg

Felix Dzerzhinsky

Bogdanov regarded Felix Dzerzhinsky as a revolutionary hero and appointed him to organize a force to combat internal threats. On 20 December 1917, the Council of People's Commissars officially established the All-Russia Extraordinary Commission to Combat Counter-revolution and Sabotage, better known as the Cheka. Dzerzhinsky became its director.
The Cheka received a large amount of resources, and became known for ruthlessly pursuing any perceived counterrevolutionary elements. Dzerzhinsky believed that the success of the Cheka depended largely on popular support. He emphasized that workers and peasants be informed about the activities of the Cheka and be appealed to in case of the need for help. In late 1917 and early 1918, the Cheka helped to eliminate sabotage in Petrograd. On December 22, 1917, a search was conducted of where the Union of the State of Office Personnel Associations, which consisted of saboteurs, had its headquarters. Dzerzhinsky personally studied the documents of the group's members, exposed the financial sources for the running of the organization, and the degree of the members personal involvement in its activities. On December 30, the members of the group were arrested by the Cheka.

In late 1918, with German troops advancing toward Petrograd, the soveta government was threatened. White Guard units, tied to German agents, were preparing a rebellion in Petrograd. Conditions in Moscow and other cities were complicated.
Large numbers of paramilitary secret organizations sprang up, such as the Union for the Defense of the Motherland and Freedom, the Right Center and the Union of Resurrection, which sought to overthrow the soveta system. In many towns and cities, there was disorder, with criminal bands capturing buildings and committing robberies. On Dzerzhinsky's proposal, the Cheka issued a statement that firm measures would be employed against the enemies of the soveta system.

Dzerzhinsky insisted that the Cheka staff should never act outside of the law, and that those placed under arrest be treated with courtesy. When he learned that one of his men hit the person he was questioning, Dzerzhinsky personally investigated the matter. He wrote on the cover of the examination record “The commission has investigated the matter and has decided to severely reprimand the guilty party, and in the future, to institute court proceedings against anyone who so much as lays a finger on a detainee.”
Dzerzhinsky considered it impermissible to use provocation and taught his staff to act before a crime that would entail arrests and other repressive acts took place. In his words, the principal goal of the Cheka was “to prevent crime, which, of course, might not produce impressive results but is actually much more productive”.

In the spring of 1918, acting on Dzerzhinsky's plan, the Cheka broke up several anarchist groups in Moscow. About 600 people were arrested, most of whom were not politically active but were in fact ordinary criminals and burglars. The same sort of operation was carried out in other cities of Russia, which helped to strengthen soveta authority and safeguard law and order.
Much of Dzerhzinsky's time and effort went into uncovering the plots organized by White Guards and anti-Sovetanoj forces. He was rarely at home, spending days and nights at his job. He often slept on a narrow iron bed with an army blanket in his office. He wrote to his wife on May 27, 1918, “It is the life of a soldier who can have no rest, for our home must be saved. There is no time to think about one’s nearest and dearest, or about oneself. The work and the struggle are hell.” During the Left SR-led revolt in Moscow in July 1918, Dzerzhinsky was captured by the rebels as he went to the rebel's headquarters.

He did not show fear and berated his captors. The news of this provoked indignation among the workers, with meetings held at factories demanding that Dzerzhinsky and other captured Bolsheviks be set free. Dzerzhinsky was disappointed with the revolt and how he had not been able to foresee it. He submitted a request to the government to be released from his duties as Cheka chairman. However the Government, specifically Bogdanov was able to convince him that his service for the revolution was still needed and that he was, even after this mistake, the best possible man for this position.
The Class War in Russia intensified due to the Czechoslovak invasion in May 1918 which was supported by the Entente powers. Anti-Sovetanoj forces as they advanced committed terror against the population, with thousands of people killed. In addition to White Terror, individual terrorism against the soveta forces significantly increased as 1918 progressed. Following the assassination attempt against Bogdanov a boiling point was reached. A campaign of repression against anti-Sovetanoj forces on August 30, 1918 started.

This campaign was dubbed "Red Terror" by the enemies of the Sovetunio although it was not even at its worst comparable with the white terror. The new policy which is known today as “Red Repression” could be summarized as an informal agreement inside the Cheka to "arrest everybody and let the courts sort the innocent out" While the death penalty still wasn't and wouldn't be reinstated, the conditions of the penalty labor camps for state enemies grew harsher. Why asked many common people should these bandits and murders be fed well and be pampered while their children were fighting, dieing for the revolution. Their children were hungry, people were starving, young girls were raped by the white savages so why they asked should the criminals not suffer for it.

The answer Bogdanov and Dzerzhinsky could give "because we are so much better then them" rang hollow in many ears. Nobody knows for sure how many white prisoners starved or were beaten to death in "self defense" when they "violently resisted" but the numbers aren't pretty, even by low estimates. In this heated atmosphere early of the final month of 1918, Dzerzhinsky left for Switzerland to see his family, and get some rest. His wife Sofia and son Jacek, who had emigrated from Russia before the Great War, lived in Bern. Dzerzhinsky had not seen his wife for eight years, and knew his son, who was born in prison, only from photographs. Dzerzhinsky spent part of his leave in Bern with his family, and part in Lugano, by the lake. In late October, he left for Russia via Germany, where a revolution was in progress, stopping over in Berlin.
In 1922, at the end of the Class War, the Cheka was renamed as the Stasek [3] , an independent organization which is controlled by the Sub Committee for internal security of the Central Executive Committee. The Stasek investigative jurisdiction is mainly limited to organized crime, the investigation of internal and external (potential) state enemies operating inside the Sovetunio. It was not placed under the authority of the Hokoina [4] which is only responsible for strictly light civilian police work like traffic police, murder, burglary, theft and others. Although there was and is a frequent cooperation between both organizations. The lack of rivalry between these agencies is mostly attributed to the close friendship between Dzerzhinsky and Yevgenia Bosch who was the first head of the Hokoina. Dzerzhinsky stayed director of the Stasek until he died in 1931.

hgq0L.jpg

Dzerzhinsky Funeral Parade

Notes

[1] Anatoly Lunacharsky On Literature and Art 1933 OTL

[2] Internacia Komunisma

[3] Stato Sekureco/ State Security/ Stasek

[4] People's Commissariat of Internal Affairs/Homaj Komisariato de Internaj aferoj/Hokoina
 
Last edited:
Heh... In the third to last paragraph a detail from the preceding versions survived, since you recently wrote that Stalin died only in 1920 and not in 1918.:)

Anyway I'd like to know if some parts of Dzerzhinsky's life weren't hidden from the public knowledge the writer invokes... In such a delicate situation for the Bolsheviks like the Class War, I believe not even a saint could totally abstain from committing reprehensible actions (which could very well be something entirely different from bloody atrocities, mind you!) or compromising with the enemy if the odds are too much against the Reds. Any hopes for something like an update titled All the truth on the Class War?:D
 
Hooray, new update! :)
Just out of curiosity, will Vladimir Vernadsky and the noosphere be making an appearance?
More than one appearance actually. Aside from his noonsphere theory which will influence biocosmist ideas, there is his advocacy of atomic energy which will a much more important role ITL way beyond simple power generation (*cough* Orion *cough* ).
Heh... In the third to last paragraph a detail from the preceding versions survived, since you recently wrote that Stalin died only in 1920 and not in 1918.:)
Yep hard to get rid of the evil bastard, but also very satisfying :).
Anyway I'd like to know if some parts of Dzerzhinsky's life weren't hidden from the public knowledge the writer invokes... In such a delicate situation for the Bolsheviks like the Class War, I believe not even a saint could totally abstain from committing reprehensible actions (which could very well be something entirely different from bloody atrocities, mind you!) or compromising with the enemy if the odds are too much against the Reds. Any hopes for something like an update titled All the truth on the Class War?:D
Well this is pretty much the reason for Knight in Sour Armour II. Just have to make sure nothing contradicts my new take on the timeline. We don't want certain unperson to suddenly pop up again. After that we will go back into the beginning of the century for more Tesla related stuff.
 
Last edited:
A Knight in Sour Armor II
A Knight in Sour Armor II



Understanding but not Apologizing


I am really not sure that I can give a definite answer to the question if Dzerzhinsky was a hero or not but I came to understand the environment that gave birth to the Cheka. Ironically it was one of the most ardent opponents of the "Red Repression" the social-libertarian journalist Victor Serge who gave me those insights:

Victor_serge.jpg

Victor Serge

...The S-R Constituent Assembly Committee assumed power in the towns of the Volga following in the train of the Czechoslovaks. Each town became, as it was captured, the scene of, a protracted massacre of socialist and suspects. “At Simbirsk, most of the Red soldiers captured in the town were shot. There was a real epidemic of lynchings,” wrote the Vestnik (Monitor) of the Constituent Assembly Committee on 28 July. In Samara itself the Committee had to order an end to the summary executions ‘on pain of having to answer for these acts’ [sic]. This democratic government was reduced to begging the Czech commander in the town to protect the workers from the violence of reaction in their own districts. At Kazan, while the Czechoslovaks pursued the retreating Reds, men with weapons and white armbands roved the streets searching houses and arresting suspects; armed with previously prepared lists and led on by informers, they cut every “Bolshevik” throat on the spot. For several days the streets were strewn with disfigured, undressed corpses.......

…...Any Reds found wounded were killed. Some of the bodies had their documents pinned to the chest: the title ‘commissar’ was displayed to explain why a man had his eyes poked out. After the passing of the first fury the reprisals go on, hardly less summary and not a whit less harsh. Class hatred is let off its leash. Each Red prisoner who walks the street, flanked by guards, is delivered to the rage of a well-dressed mob. ‘Young women slapped them and spat in their eyes. The corpses were trampled underfoot; the eyes of the dead were gouged out,’ writes one witness. The trial of any Bolshevik amounted to the formality of a brief interrogation before execution......


..Little by little, more and more completely, the Class War enveloped the whole of the countryside. The kulaks hid the grain, sounded the alarm when the food brigades approached, sometimes engaged in standing battles, but more often stole out at night to murder the workers who had come looking for grain. The poor peasants formed committees which worked as a substitute for the food supply organization, and conducted requisitioning themselves. In the smallest villages, a war to the death flared up around the corn. There were interventions by Red troops. The newspapers were full of reports of this kind:
Smirnovo district, Orel
gubernia. When a detachment of Red soldiers came to take the grain, the kulaks raised loud shouts of “By what right do you come to take what you have not sown?” It was impossible to persuade them. They fired upon the brigade, killing the commissar and several soldiers. The Provincial Executive sent along a strong detachment accompanied by armored cars. The kulaks have been taught a good lesson. There were incidents of priests refusing burial to those who were assailing the property of the Church. At Livny, not far from Orel, a whole district rose in rebellion, with more than 300 counter-revolutionaries killed in the struggle and the subsequent repression....”

Vgmyh.jpg

Victim of the White Terror Campaign

Indeed as Serge noted with the Republic surrounded, starving and infested with conspiracies, things did look rather fragile. The role of the proletariat’s true leaders was crucial precisely because they could not be replaced. Personal merit, authority, influence, all are historical products formed by the working class with the assistance of time and of the events for which nothing could substitute. The dominant classes which had attained a high degree of culture were in a position, during their periods of good fortune, to create in large quantities the leaders that they required. Whereas the working class, given its present state of oppression and lack of culture, could make up for the absence or the death of its leaders only by political organization at best. This was one of the grave problems confronting it the period of crisis

A truth Dzerzhinsky's fellow comrades and long time friends Rosa Luxemburg and Leo Jogiches knew all too well. Indeed, Jogiches had insisted that Luxemburg and Liebknecht flee to Switzerland before the Communists brought disaster upon themselves when the German revolution started.
Thus when both were chosen to represent the newly founded DSP (German Socialist Party) at an emergency meeting at the police headquarter in Berlin at January 1919 they advocated caution, to prevent a premature revolution. While both believed in revolutionary action they knew that they were not yet prepared to follow the example of their Russian comrades.
The representative of the Obleute at the meeting Richard Müller recorded the following lines: “The masses make revolution, but their leaders must avoid at all costs sticking their heads into the nooses of the counter-revolution. The German workers are not so spirited that they will press on when Comrade Ledebour and I hang side by side from the lamp-posts”.
Luxembourg instead tabled a motion of her own calling for the workers to arm themselves and to fraternize with the soldiers but to avoid confrontations with the police and the soldiers [1].

She knew all to well that the most efficient way to fight a revolution is to strike down the revolution in the person of its leaders. A lesson also learned by the Right S-R party who soon began to revive their terrorist tradition. The S-R Central Committee, had declared that individual assassinations were impermissible now that czardom had fallen; but, following on the dissolution of the Constituent Assembly, the Brest-Litovsk treaty and the pressure of the Allies, the mentality and the politics of the party had undergone a profound change.
Meeting from 7 to 14 May, the Eighth National Council of the S-R party had solemnly approved the principle of foreign intervention in Russia, in terms that were scarcely modulated even by hypocrisy:


“Considering that the policies of the Bolshevik government threaten the very independence of Russia, this Eighth S-R Party National Council is of the opinion that this danger can be removed only by the immediate liquidation of the Bolshevik government and the transfer of authority to a legitimate government elected by universal suffrage ... Such a government could permit, for purely strategic purposes, the entry of Allied troops on to Russian territory, on condition that non-interference by the foreign powers in Russian domestic affairs and the territorial integrity of the country were guaranteed...”

This amounted to yet one more statement, sufficiently clear in its own terms, that against the Bolsheviks all means were good. The terrorist’s Browning automatic was not so different as it may seem from the aeroplane of the Czechoslovaks. Nevertheless Serge who lived trough those times, wrote about the atrocities in detail still believed that the formation of the Chekas was one of the gravest and most impermissible errors that the Bolshevik leadership committed in those days of the 1918s when plots, blockades, and interventions made them lose their collective heads. The party endeavored to head it with incorruptible men like the former convict Dzerzhinsky, who Serge described as “a sincere idealist, ruthless but chivalrous, with the emancipated profile of an Inquisitor: tall forehead, bony nose, untidy goatee, and an expression of weariness and austerity.”

KGB_Symbol.png

Cheka Emblem

But the party had few men of this stand and many Chekas: these gradually came to select their personnel by virtue of their psychological inclinations. The only temperaments that devoted themselves willingly and tenaciously to this task of internal defense, he describes were those characterized by suspicion embitterment, harshness and sadism.

Long standing social inferiority complexes and memories of humiliations and suffering in the Czar's jail rendered them intractable, and since professional degeneration happens all to rapidly, the Chekas inevitably consisted of perverted men tending to see conspiracy everywhere and to live in the midst of perpetual conspiracy themselves. By the beginning of 1919 the Chekas had little or no resistance against this psychological perversion and corruption. It is a well documented fact that Dzerzhinsky in one of the party meetings judged them to be "half-rotten", and saw no solution to the evil except, as he cynically remarked, “to reinstate the death-penalty for one day so that one half of the Chekist might shoot the other half.”
There was also good reason for people, like my parents and their friend to remain suspicious of the Cheka/Statesk and its agents even after the war was formally over. A piece of paper is certainly not enough to set a war forged mind to ease as the latest revelations on Comrade Kamo show [2]. No, they were absolutely justified to look over their shoulder just once a while.


Conclusions

Bukharin famously eulogized Dzerzhinsky as "...a devout knight of the proletariat." And I guess he fits almost all of the things you might expect from a knight in fairy tales.
He was brave, honorable, loved his family and fought for the good cause. Yet a knight in shining knight he was not. It is an unfortunate fact of life that it is almost inevitably to get bloody hands when you slay a dragon.


Notes and Sources

[1] This passage and general POD ideas behind the German Revolution in this timeline are originally from Zimmerwald1915's great timeline: "Wir sind Spartakus!"

[2] The indecent the author is referring to:

Kamo (Semeno Ter-Petrossian) after his release from prison and the seizing of power by the Bolsheviks, seemed bored with the new life outside of prison. Josef Stalin introduced him to Bogdanov as: "The old bank robber-terrorist of the Caucasus." He paced the halls of the Kremlin until he was allowed to create his own band of men who would help raid money on the other side of the Eastern Front to support the country. Having been given permission to create his own gang, Kamo would test all of his new members to make sure that they were up to the task.

Kamo would test his new recruits by taking the new recruits to a forest clearing and have them be attacked by fake White army members, bound to a tree, and then put through a fake execution to test their courage. Kamo said that with this test "you could be absolutely sure [your comrades] wouldn't let you down." On one occasion, a recruit revealed himself to a be a spy when tested by Kamo; he was shot on the spot. Kamo then cut open the man's chest and tore out the heart showing it to the other recruits.

Unlike OTL where Lenin shunned Kamo, being justifiably disturbed Bogdanov gets him psychological help in form of Vladmir Bekhterev. He is treated up to the point where Bogdanov sees him as stable enough to head the Stasek. The records of Bekhterev sessions and other documents of the incident were kept top secret for obvious reasons but later leaked out anyway.
 
Last edited:
Aaah, "Wir Sind Spartakus!" (nostalgia inside :()... An excellent place to get inspiration from, ComradeHuxley. If things in Germany are going in that direction it means NO Spartachist Uprising and a preservation of the Communist ideologues... That's sure to produce astounding effects on the development of politics in Germany, possibly butterflying away a good part of the Thirties as we know it!:eek: So the tripartition of the left persists? Moderate SPD, radical USPD, very radical KPD/DSP (with Liebknecht in the Reichstag?:D)? And no Bavarian Soviet Republic?

Awaiting now for some other ATL details on Tesla's activity, I was thinking that, since version 3.0 of your TL has "Avantgarde triumphant" in its subtitle, maybe there are some interesting developments about my country that you could explore. To put it simply, before 1935 and the so-called "Imperial Phase", i.e. when Italy (or better, the Fascist hierarchies) started to look at itself as a Second Roman Empire, a sort of Avantgardist Fascist culture, born from the intermixing of the architectural Modern Movement, Abstractism and Futurist stylemas, tried to impose itself as the standard of Fascism in the international intellectual and artistic landscape. It failed, but in an allohistoric scenario like this it could survive and prosper becoming that positive core that Fascism (in itself a negative ideology, as I've already written in v2.0) needed IOTL, but never got, to propose itself as a full-fledged philosophical system, with its own authonomous intellectual community. If you're interested let me know.
 
Last edited:
The "Avantgarde triumphant" subtitle is indeed the program for this timeline. Instead of getting a more or less doomed premature Spartacus uprising, we get a proper socialist revolution. In fact Middle and Western Europe will be deep Red in the twenties.
All those awesome artistic and political fringe figures in Germany, Bulgaria, Hungary...will suddenly find themselves in power. There are also the ideals and ideas of the May Fourth Movement in China which will survive and thrive under a (teeth cringing) President Wang Jingwei.

The plan for "World War 2", is a war between the Interkom States and the Fascist Allies France, Japan and Italy, with Anglo-Americans staying neutral for obvious reasons. Now the brand of fascism Italy pursues is going to be very futurist influenced. Ever since I read this thread https://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=238278 I wanted them to succeed just for the insane food stuff alone. So if you are interested I would appreciate your help on the topic very much. Japan and France however are going to have their own kinds of fascist regimes which follow their historical development lines.
The third phase of the timeline will deal with the post war world were a socialist Eurasia and capitalist “Oceania” fight the Cold War around the globe and beyond.

Unfortunately the next post concerning Tesla is going to take quiet a while because the topic is rather difficult, yet crucial for the rest of the timeline.
 
The "Avantgarde triumphant" subtitle is indeed the program for this timeline. Instead of getting a more or less doomed premature Spartacus uprising, we get a proper socialist revolution. In fact Middle and Western Europe will be deep Red in the twenties.
All those awesome artistic and political fringe figures in Germany, Bulgaria, Hungary...will suddenly find themselves in power. There are also the ideals and ideas of the May Fourth Movement in China which will survive and thrive under a (teeth cringing) President Wang Jingwei.

You're the first author on this website who applies such a degree of glasnost to the developments of his TL.:p:p:p I really don't know now how to behave with you r future updates on politics...:p:p:p
If Germany is going to join the INTERKOM I already have a few suggestions for you:

- Have the Bauhaus School survive (not too difficult...);
- Keep Hannes Meyer as School Principal (less Mies is more!);
- Get him as People's Commissar for Urban and Infrastructural Development or something like that (he was a dedicated Communist IOTL, so no major roadblocks).

Look up for that guy's projects! He was insane!:eek: Schools with suspended playgrounds is too much of an opportunity to miss...

The plan for "World War 2", is a war between the Interkom States and the Fascist Allies France, Japan and Italy, with Anglo-Americans staying neutral for obvious reasons. Now the brand of fascism Italy pursues is going to be very futurist influenced. Ever since I read this thread https://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=238278 I wanted them to succeed just for the insane food stuff alone. So if you are interested I would appreciate your help on the topic very much. Japan and France however are going to have their own kinds of fascist regimes which follow their historical development lines.
The third phase of the timeline will deal with the post war world were a socialist Eurasia and capitalist “Oceania” fight the Cold War around the globe and beyond.

I knew nothing about Futurist cooking... Good luck for finding a plausible way to keep an Italian away from pasta for all of his life anyway.:p But the idea of a meal where some dishes are there to satisfy senses that are not flavour is damn intriguing!:)

So, if you are interested I'll PM you what info I can gather about the Avantgardist Italian artistic landscape and some plausible ways it could have evolved were it not for Mussolini's ever-changing tastes.

Unfortunately the next post concerning Tesla is going to take quiet a while because the topic is rather difficult, yet crucial for the rest of the timeline.

Hey, take your time! You seldomly let us (this reader in particular, at least) down with your updates!
 
History of the Telemobiloscope
History of the Telemobiloscope


Christian Hülsmeyer

Pinpointing the exact moment the story of the Telemobiloscope began is rather difficult. As early as 1886, Heinrich Hertz showed that radio waves could be reflected from solid objects. In 1895 Alexander Popov, a physics instructor at the Imperial Russian Navy school in Kronstadt, developed an apparatus using a coherer tube for detecting distant lightning strikes. The next year, he added a spark-gap transmitter.
In 1897, while testing this device in communicating between two ships in the Baltic Sea, he took note of an interference beat caused by the passage of a third vessel. In his report, Popov wrote that this phenomenon might be used for detecting objects, but he did nothing more with this observation until the young German engineer Christian Hülsmeyer demonstrated his “anti-ship-colliding system” and Russia's dramatic loss in its war against Japan.

This presentation of the system happened in June 1904 three month after the Japanese had made their nightly surprise attack on Port Arthur. Uninvolved in this ongoing conflict the twenty-two-year-old Christian Hülsmeyer impressed the technical representatives of the main Atlantic civilian shipping companies, which at that time were from Holland, Britain, France and Germany. The demonstration was arranged to take place during a Nautical Conference, hosted that year by the Holland-Amerika-Lijn (HAL) shipping company. The conference chairman was the HAL CEO Wierdsma, who by his personal involvement, made it possible for Hülsmeyer to demonstrate his apparatus to an international gathering of experts.

Hi7HQ.png

Christian Hülsmeyer

Hülsmeyer was born at Eydelstedt, a village in Lower Saxony, Germany. He was the youngest of five children of Johann Heinrich Ernst Meyer and Elisabeth Wilhelmine Brenning. His birth name was Johann Christel, but after early childhood the name Christian was used. Following completion of the local Volksschule (elementary school), he attended Grundschule (primary school) in nearby Donstorf. A teacher there recognized his capabilities and, in 1896, assisted him in gaining admission to the Lehrerseminare (Teacher Training College) in Bremen.
The college's new physics laboratory was equipped for Hertzian-wave experiments and it is most likely that he became intrigued by the implications of Hertzian phenomena there for the first time. No doubt with encouragement from his physics teacher Richard Klimpt who was allowing him the use of the laboratory even after normal college hours.

In June 1900, Hülsmeyer left college without completing his studies and obtained a job as an electrical trainee in the Siemens & Halske factory in Bremen. A number of suggestions have been put forward for the reasons Hülsmeyer left college. The most well known story is that he was impressed by the tragic death of someone from his home village, who died during a ship collision at the Weser river.

While working for Siemens he learned how concepts of devices were turned into commercial applications, intensifying his inventive nature. In April 1902, he left employment with Siemens to live with his brother Wilhelm in Düsseldorf and pursue his ideas for electrical and optical products. His brother initially funded him in setting up a shop where, a number of ideas were quickly turned into working items.
These included a device (called a Telephonogram) that telegraphed sounds; an electro-optical system for turning a truck into a mobile, multi-faced billboard; and a wireless apparatus for remotely igniting explosives. Within a year, he filed several patent applications on these and other inventions.

He then turned his full attention to using the Hertz phenomenon in a system for preventing collisions between ships. Giving the name Telemobiloskop (Telemobiloscope) to the system, he made a patent application in November 1903, and also began its advertisement to gain financial backer.
Henry Mannheim, a leather merchant in Cologne, responded, and in March 1904, invested 2,000 Marks for 20 percent of future profits from the apparatus. The firm Telemobiloskop–Gesellschaft Hülsmeyer & Mannheim was opened the following May and officially registered in Cologne in July 1904. Hülsmeyer’s initial patent application for the Telemobiloscope was rejected, but a refiling, dated in April of the same year was accepted, resulting in patent publication.

The patent described a "Herzian-wave Projecting and Receiving Apparatus Adapted to Indicate or Give Warning of the Presence of a Metallic Body, such as Ships or Train, in the Line of Projecting of such Waves."

Hülsmeyer himself gave the following description of the TMS [1]:My invention is based upon the property of electric waves of being reflected back towards their source on meeting a metallic body, and will be readily understood by imagining a transmitter and a receiver station such as indicated placed side by side at the same point and so arranged that waves projected from the transmitter can only actuate the receiver by being reflected from some metallic body, which, at sea, would presumably be another ship. (...) My apparatus comprises a transmitting and a receiving station similar to those used in wireless telegraphy, with this difference that the two stations are situated in close proximity to each other and are so arranged and constructed that they cannot directly influence one another.”

His contraption was fixed in a Cardan-suspension since: "In view of the fact that ships are at times subject to considerable rolling, pitching and like motion, which might otherwise render the apparatus practically useless. I mount both the transmitter and receiver similarly to a compass-box, about as shown in Fig.2a, so that they are maintained by action of gravity in an approximately vertical position. .."
As the danger of collision is, more or less, equal from any quarter, he thought that it was obvious to look at all directions and provided his TMS system with a continuously rotating mechanism.

s8w8y.jpg

Telemobiloscope

The first public demonstration of the TMS was in the courtyard of the Dom Hotel in Cologne in May 1904. The metal gate to the courtyard was the target, and the transmission path was through a curtain, showing that the apparatus could work when the target could not be seen. The demonstration was reported widely in newspapers, one giving a detailed description.
Later a conference was held in June 1904, at Scheveningen, Holland, involving the major shipping firms of the region; ship safety was a hot topic.
After learning of the demonstration at the Dom Hotel, the head of the Holland-Amerika Lijn (HAL) invited Telemobiloskop-Gesellschaft to provide a demonstration of their apparatus during the conference. This demonstration took place June as well during a tour through the harbor at Rotterdam aboard the ship-tender Columbus. The Minutes of the conference (contained in the HAL Archives in the Municipal Archives of Rotterdam) include the following description of the demonstration:

"Vessels fitted with his apparatus, can discover at night or in a fog etc., at a distance of up to 3½ miles, other vessels and the position of these vessels. The trial on board of the Columbus, though on very limited scale and with an unfinished apparatus, proved that the principle of the inventor is correct. Every time when, even at certain distance, a vessel passed, the apparatus operated immediately. The apparatus used in this trial was not yet arranged for determination of the distance."

Hülsmeyer himself recalled during a later interview that the audience was quiet enthusiastic shacking his hands and congratulated him for his good work. Only the British attendees responded with skepticism and reservations. One was even calling Hülsmeyer's invention “embryonic”. Hülsmeyer's retort came promptly: "Yes an embryo Sir, but a healthy, growing one."

Indeed he applied for a distance measuring extension to his patent, just one week after he returned home from Rotterdam. He gave due thought to several solutions as to how to obtain sufficient data. In the end by adjusting the machine correctly one could now simply read from an indicator, with or without using a conversion table, the required information. The basis for this was trigonometric calculation. He also proposed that the entire installation, including the antenna systems should be covered by means of low-loss non conducting material, so as to protect it from environmental influences.

The building of the Telemobiloscope and its demonstrations had depleted the initial funds of the Telemobiloskop–Gesellschaft firm. But at the same time Nikola Tesla had already contacted Hülsmeyer an offered his help and patents in exchange for company stocks. The addition of this great genius to his other backers from the shipping industry finally resulted in the commercialization of his invention, trough a consortium lead by the the trading company ZH. Gumpel.

Art of Individualization

In March 1904 Christian Hülsmeyer claimed the patent for his “Echo – Receiver with interference blocking” which is sometimes confused as part of his other more well known invention the TMS.

Hülsmeyer described his idea as part of an endeavor to not only utilize electromagnetic waves as a means of communication but also “for actuating mechanism placed at distance, for instance closing circuits and releasing clockworks, for the purpose of turning on and off all kinds of lights, the lighting of mines, for putting motors into and out of circuit, for the service of gates, switches or signaling on railways.”
In order to do so reliably “In all such cases it is necessary that no other waves save those from the proper transmitter should ever actuate or in any manner affect the working of the same.”

The purpose of this invention was clear. It was to prevent remote-controlled wireless systems for being corrupted by unauthorized signals by strictly controlling the time the the apparatus would respond to outside signal using synchronized clocks decohering coherer at the right time.
However Hülsmeyer, as many had in the early days of the EM wave research, distinguished two kinds of wireless signals, one of which was caused by lightning bursts and the other by regular morse signal transmissions.

This arrangement could not however function as part of a TMS, since a coherer is needed which would be permanently in “switched-on” mode and not one only open in certain time windows. Unlike others at this point Hüslmeyer was not aware of the danger that artificial signals (as opposed to lightning) and the resulting interference by newly build radio stations from all over the world could pose to his other invention the TMS.
Thankfully Hülsmeyer patented this "Echo- Receiver" device in America. There Nikola Tesla an expert in the field of wireless communication and signaling had become very sensitive to people trying to interfere or claiming his patents. He just won a vicious patent war against the Italian inventor Marconi, who tried to pass Telsa's inventions as his own and was rather paranoid about similar actions by others.

Not yet married to Anne Morgan, finding potential business opportunities for his inventions and patents was key to his independence as well as defending his intellectual property. Still even in the 1880s Tesla benefited from financial support from partnership with investors at a level unavailable to any other independent inventor. Equated with with today's values these resources would equal several million dollar. Such funding enabled him to employ various craftsman to design and construct a large inventory of apparatus and machinery.
Tesla's experiments and patent model apparatus were of the highest quality, all appropriate for exhibit purposes. A practical reason, aside from Tesla's penchant for luxuriant effects, was the necessity to impress needed investors and the news media.


Tesla_fig07.jpg

Teleautomaton

One of such demonstration had taken place in 1898 in Madison Square Garden where exhibited his radio-controlled boa which he had dubbed "teleautomaton". While designing this vehicle, it became apparent to Tesla that some means had to be provided for secure remote control in order to prevent interfering signals caused by natural effects but also deliberate intervention form outside sources.
These efforts led him to devise methods for selectively activating any of several wireless receivers (he called this "the art of individualization") that involved multiple transmissions on separate frequencies. At the receiving end, each one of the individual frequency components had to be tuned in, in order for the receiver to respond.
In June of 1899 Tesla established an experimental station at Colorado Springs where he continued his studies. Realizing the importance of his ground-breaking techniques he gave instructions upon his return to New York that patent applications be prepared and submitted.

During the review period, the Patent Office told Tesla that another patent application for a similar concept had been received from Reginald Fessenden, and in 1902 a U.S. Patent Interference investigation was conducted concerning Tesla's wireless communications system. In the end, Tesla's claims were supported and he was granted protection under the "System of Signaling" and "Method of Signaling" patent. While the Hülsmeyer patent didn't affect Tesla, but he was nevertheless intrigued by the design. He convinced the German inventor that he needed his mechanism to secure his TMS from unwanted outside signals, on top of ensuring some basic signal selectivity in the first place.

Things looked promising so far although the technology was still it in its infancy. Nevertheless the backing of major shipping companies and the prestige of Nikola Tesla's involvement gave the nenecessary boost for the first commercially available TMS. But the next big innovations would come from an entirely other place and man...

Notes

[1] Telemobiloscope also known as TMS
 
Last edited:
You're the first author on this website who applies such a degree of glasnost to the developments of his TL. I really don't know now how to behave with you r future updates on politics...
I do everything I can do make the time jumping less confusing. Having a basic timeline of the political events lined out should help a lot. The real surprises of the timeline, at least in my opinion, lie in the tech- and cultural wank anyway.
If Germany is going to join the INTERKOM I already have a few suggestions for you:

- Have the Bauhaus School survive (not too difficult...);
- Keep Hannes Meyer as School Principal (less Mies is more!);
- Get him as People's Commissar for Urban and Infrastructural Development or something like that (he was a dedicated Communist IOTL, so no major roadblocks).
Look up for that guy's projects! He was insane! Schools with suspended playgrounds is too much of an opportunity to miss...

I just had the time to look Meyer's work up and he is indeed a perfect addition for the timeline. He will certainly have a long and happy career ITL Germany.
new nothing about Futurist cooking... Good luck for finding a plausible way to keep an Italian away from pasta for all of his life anyway. But the idea of a meal where some dishes are there to satisfy senses that are not flavor is damn intriguing!

So, if you are interested I'll PM you what info I can gather about the Avantgardist Italian artistic landscape and some plausible ways it could have evolved were it not for Mussolini's ever-changing tastes.
For now I will concentrate on developing Tesla/Bogdanov and stuff related to them to build up the general world. But I would nevertheless appreciate everything you can send me on Italy. But I can't promise it will show up in the timeline soon.

Merry Christmas by the way :).
 
The other Revolution
The other Revolution


From "little" to "big" science at the example of blood transfusion

In the shadow of the socialist revolution in Russia, in the aftermath of the Great War, another world revolution happened, one that was successful. It was the revolution of science, a revolution of scale. At the start of the twentieth century science began its transformation from small sized endeavor of individual researchers (and their students), who made their own simple instruments and often financed their own pursuits, into a industrial enterprise that involved large specialized institutions, hundreds of workers, complex machinery and ever more resources.

Scientists all over the world desperately sought patrons and partners to provide the support and funding necessary for this emerging “big science”. In the Sovetunio they found such a partner in the Bolshevik state.
No patron were more willing or more enthusiastic in their support of science than the Bolsheviks. In just two decades after the revolution the combined effort of scientists and the new Bolshevik government transformed the Sovetunio from a modest province of world science into one of the greatest centers. Each partner had its own vision of this joint venture, each had something to gain from it, and each had a price to pay. Various scholars have explored the mechanics and dynamics of the alliance between sovetaj scientists and the soveta state. This short essay will demonstrate this relationship between those two actors, state and scientist, on the life of Vladimir Shamov. He mastered the balance act between science, ideology and politics like few others and made the Sovetunio the absolute leader in the field of blood transfusions.


W7DlG.jpg

Vladimir Shamov

For most of its history science in Russia developed in close contact with and under the influence of its counterparts abroad. Indeed in the mid-nineteenth century, the majority of Russia's premiere scientists were foreigners, and after that, nearly all of Russia's leading scientists spent some time abroad studying, doing postgraduate work, attending conferences and occasionally lecturing at various scientific institutions in Western Europe. Not surprisingly Vladimir Shamov followed the same path. Born 1882 in a family of school teacher he graduated from a gymnasium in Perm and enrolled in the Military Medicine Academy (MMA) in St. Petersburg. He was seen as the best student of his year. He graduated with first-class honors in 1908 after being released from prison. He was arrested because of this active support of the revolution in 1905. Unlike the other students who had to find work all around Russia, he was allowed to stay in St. Petersburg and become a graduate student under the prominent military surgeon Sergey Fedorov. In 1913 Fedorov was named chief surgeon of the Russian army and he promptly send his assistant abroad to learn about the newest advances in surgical technique.

To explore possibly completely new techniques, instead of going to France or Germany, Shamov went to England and the USA. The American part of the trip proved particularly exciting and rewarding. He met the brightest minds of medical research in the US at the time. What left the most lasting impression on him however was to witness successful human blood transfusion be performed in the Case Western Reserve University by George Washington Crile. While James Blundell pioneered the concept of blood transfusion already in the 1820th seemingly nobody was able to find a way to perform them safely and routinely. As a professor at the University of Kiev said jokingly: “To perform a blood transfusion you need three lambs, one-whose blood is transfused, another one from whom it its transfused and at least a third one who transfuses it (1902).”

Obviously Shamov was not prepared for this, as he readily admitted later: “Having come to America, I perceived with deep skepticism the reports that the Americans had again begun to perform blood transfusion, the operation that the European sciences seemed to have proven to be unequivocally unscientific and useless. I was astonished that in Crile's clinic blood transfusions were not only not accompanied by complications or dangers but to the contrary they produced very demonstrable, simply miraculous results. Having observed the results I quickly changed from a deep skeptic to an enthusiast and convinced proponent of the method of blood transfusion.” Also at his own accord he would have loved to stay longer in the US, the outbreak of the Great War meant he had to go home. In late August, he returned to St. Petersburg to resume his post as assistant surgeon at the MMA. He kept working for Fedorov's clinic through the Great War, the revolution and the Class War. The trip to America made a indelible impression on the young surgeon. Ever since he returned from the US, Shamov wanted to employ his newfound knowledge of blood transfusion in his own clinical practices. But the reality of Russian life cooled down his enthusiasm. Shamov's effusive tales of Crile's success with blood transfusions failed to convince his MMA colleagues, who remained highly skeptical regarding this “discredited” operation.

There was however one important exception, his patron Fedorov, who trusted his star student's judgment and allowed him complete freedom in his ward. Shamov however had to overcome a far more serious obstacle, he couldn't find a donor. “When I raised the issue of blood transfusion of other's blood, patients and their relatives did not want to hear about these “horrifying” experiments. Despite all my perpetuation, no a single person was willing to give blood for a transfusion.” Adding to his troubles, the war made it impossible for Shamov to get the standard blood sera for determining blood groups of donors and their recipient from the US. Still in the end he prevailed by making his own sera. Finally, in June 1919, at the height of the Class War, Shamov found the opportunity to realize his dream and to perform blood transfusions at the MMA clinic. In his recollections, written twenty years after the fact, he provided a poetic account of the first attempt. Shamov had a patient with a large cervical tumor in the clinic's gynecological ward. He wanted to excise the tumor but feared that the patient was too weak and anemic to survive the operation because of repeated excessive bleeding from the tumor.

Shamov decided to try a blood transfusion. Since as mentioned above he had no access to blood sera, he collected blood samples from twenty two of the academy's worker and students. Then he cross matched all the samples and was able to find a suitable donor, a young woman working at the academy as a typist. It took Shamov several days (and the promise of paid vacation) to convince the woman that giving blood for a transfusion would not do her harm but rather could save the life of his patient. Shamov didn't have the necessary equipment of the US clinics, to perform a direct transfusion of blood from the donor to the patient. He decided to use the much simpler method of indirect transfusion with citrated blood which had become popular in the Great War among allied surgeons.
Of course despite his firm belief in in the mighty science of Western surgeon's successes with blood transfusions, Shamov felt quite uncertain about the outcome of his own first try. The skepticism of his colleagues was infectious. A number of “what ifs” revolved in his mind:

“What if the favorable results I had observed in the US were just a coincidence? What if the issue of the compatibility of donor's recipients blood is not only limited to determining their blood groups? What if there are other, yet unknown factors involved? What if precisely in my own case these unknown factors lead to the death of my patient from transfusion of another's blood, as has happened more than once in the past practice of the operation? What if the young woman who so trustingly decided to give her blood for the transfusion got sick as a result? What if she developed tuberculosis?”

With shaking hands he started the procedure under the inquisitive gazes of his skeptical colleagues. In the end science triumphed, the collection and the transfusion of 570 milliliter of citrated blood went smoothly, with no complications:
“The donor easily withstood the bloodletting. The patient's conditions improved dramatically and several days later I was able to excise the tumor. In the end the patient recovered and could be discharged from the clinic.”
Inspired by the success, in June 1920, Shamov presented a long report on blood transfusion at a general conference of Russia's MMA. He began describing the deep disillusionment about the clinical value that had emerged toward the end of the nineteenth century and remained among the majority of physicians up to this day. Shamov argued forcefully that this situation had to change. He referred to his experiences in the US, his own clinical experiences and to the discovery of sodium citrate's anticoagulation properties that allowed to replace the surgically demanding method of direct blood transfusion by an indirect one.

Still, staff members of other MMA clinics, who had not witnessed Shamov's actual transfusions, greeted his reports with customary skepticism and disbelief. Not discouraged by the cool reception of his presentation Shamov was determined to popularize blood transfusion as a life saving method of medicine. In September of 1921 Fedorov took a leave of absence from his MMA clinic and appointed Shamov as the acting head, With Fedorov's blessing Shamov immediately organized a group of undergraduate and graduate students to study blood groups, to manufacture the sera for blood typing and to expand the use of blood transfusion in his own clinical practice.

Shamov also published the first article on the subject of blood transfusion in the Sovetunio which resulted in a stream of letters from physicians all over the country asking for details of Shamov's operations, particular the determination of blood groups, as well as sera for blood typing. He and his group generously sent out their standard sera along with detailed instructions on how to use them. But serving as the Sovetunio's supplier of sera was obviously not something Shamo's busy surgical clinic could afford to do on regular basis. There had to be other ways to popularize blood transfusion. At this time Shamov formed the idea in his head, for a research and “propaganda” institute solely dedicated to blood research.He was not the first one to see the importance of blood transfusion, in 1920 the Scientific Medical Council of the the People's Commissariat of Health Protection received a proposal to establish a “hematological institute for the treatment and study of blood diseases” from Savely Tsypkin, a well known Moscow internist. At a meeting in December 1920 the council discussed the proposal. Its members decided that a “study of the pathogenesis of various blood diseases from pathological-anatomical, biochemical, and sociological points of view could be successful carried out at existing clinical establishments, as well as at existing institutes of biochemistry and serology” and concluded that the creation of a separate hematological institute was unnecessary.

In 1922 Shamov proposed the establishment of an institute for research on blood and blood transfusions. He presented a long memorandum on the issue to the Main Military Sanitary Directorate. After outlining the early history of blood transfusions and the discovery of blood groups, Shamov detailed the experiences with blood transfusions gathered during the Great War, which had promoted important developments in the technique and organization of services for blood transfusion in the West, particularly in the USA. He even provided a brief summary of the reports on blood transfusion presented in the first international congress of surgeons held in Paris 1920. He also described his own work in the field and urged the Main Military Sanitary Directorate to consider the subject of blood transfusion a priority for the Red Army's medical services and suggested that a special institute “to study the properties of blood in relation to transfusion” be established. To asses the proposal the council set up a special commission. Unfortunately Nikolai Burdenko was the only member with any experience in transfusion and was therefore the one to write the commissions final assessment. Burdenko had only limited experience with the operation, he just performed two transfusions so far, both unsuccessful, which made him dismiss the notion that blood transfusion would have much of a future in medicine. Shamov's proposal was rejected.

At this point it seemed that it would take many more years until something like a blood transfusion institute would be established. But Shamov was not only persistent and enthusiastic against all odds, but also lucky. In the same year a book titled “Blood Transfusion" was published in the Sovetunio that had a foreword written by Alexander Bogdanov who praised the book as brilliant work of research and medicine. As it happened the People's Commissar of Foreign Trade and close personal friend of Bogdanov, Leonid Krasin found a the book when he visited London with a soveta trade delegation. Krasin was generally interested in life sciences and that the book had been written by Geoffrey Keyenes, the younger brother of the economist John Mayard Keyenes made it probably even more intriguing in Krasin's eyes. He brought a copy of the book with him as a present for Bogdanov, since he knew his friend would be interested as well. Indeed the book was informative and included the newest, up to date knowledge on blood transfusion available. Nevertheless Shamov was surprised to find out that Bogdanov had any interest in his own field of science. So far he had been an elusive far away political figure. Shamov began to research the connection between Bogdanov and blood transfusion.

His first step was to red the novels Red Star (1908) and Engineer Menni (1913) which Bogdanov wrote in exile. It was common knowledge that Bogdanov used both books to outline his ideas in a simple and easily to grasp form. Indeed Shamov was rewarded with in insight into Bogdanov's mind, his fascination with blood transfusion.
In the following exchange between a human visitor on Mars and a Martin doctor Bogdanov explained his world view comprehensively :

ooFKZ.jpg

Leonid (left) and Netti (right)

Leonid
"Why do you Martians preserve your youth so long. Is this a peculiarity of your race, the result of better living conditions or is there some other explanation?"

Netti
“Race has nothing to do with it. Two hundred years ago our life expectancy was only half of what it is now. Better living conditions? Yes, that is part of the answer, but only part. The main factor is the method we use to renew life."

This method as it turns out is systematic blood transfusion.

Netti
"Its actually very simple, and although it will probably seem strange to you, your science already has the knowledge needed to apply this method. You know that in order to increase the viability of cells or organisms, nature constantly supplements one individual with another. Thus when the vitality of unicellular beings is impaired by lack of variation in the environment, they fuse together, two becoming one, this is the only way way to recovering the immortality of their protoplasm, that is, their ability to procreate. The crossing of higher plants and animals does the same thing. In such a cases as well vital elements of two different beings are united in order to obtain a more perfect embryo of a third one. Then of course you are acquainted with blood serum transfusions and the way in which they transmit elements of vitality from one being to another. For example, they can increase resistance to different disease. We go even further and perform mutual blood transfusion between human beings, whereby each individual receives from the other a number of elements which can raise his life expectancy. Such an exchange involves merely pumping the blood of one person into another and back again by means of devices which connect their respective circulatory systems. If all precautions are taken, it is a perfectly safe procedure. The blood of one person continues to live in the organism of the other, where it mixes with the own blood and throughly regenerates all his tissues."

Leonid
"Are you able to rejuvenate old people by introducing young blood into their veins?"

Netti
"To an extend, yes but not altogether, because there is more than just blood in the organism, and the body in its turn also has an effect upon the blood. That is why, for example, a young person will not age from the blood of an old one. The age and weakness in the blood are quickly overcome by the organism, which at the same time absorbs from it many elements which it lacks. The energy and flexibility of the vital functions also increases."

Leonid
"But if it is all so simple, how is it that our medicine on Earth does not yet employ that method? If I am not mistaken after all, blood transfusions have been known for hundreds of years."

Netti
"I don't know. Perhaps there are organic factors which render the method ineffective to Earthlings. Or perhaps it is merely due to your predominantly individualistic psychology, which isolates people from each other so completely that that the thought of fusing them is almost incomprehensible to your scientist. Also on Earth there are many common diseases which poison the blood, diseases of which those who have them are often unaware, which they sometimes simply try to conceal. The blood transfusion presently performed by your medicine somehow smack of philanthropy, people who have a lot of blood give some of it to others who need it desperately due to, say injuries. We, of course, do the same, but we do not stop there. Quite in keeping with the nature of our entire system, our regular comradely exchanges of life extend beyond the ideological dimension into the psychological one."


Another better source was an article Bogdanov had written in 1920 “The Tectology of the Struggle against Old Age”. Not only was it newer than anything else it was also written explicitly as a scientific text and not as part of a SF novel.
His basic ideas had not changed significantly, as he theorized that blood exchange might represent a from of “physiological conjugation” somewhat similar to the conjugation of unicellular organism. As the conjugation insofar “renews” their life to allow them to become virtually immortal so too would blood exchange between human individuals allow them to “extend their life”. But his busy schedule kept Bogdanov from dwelling on these thoughts for any longer timespans.

Shamov was less than impressed with Bogdanovs ideas. In his private journal he wrote that Bogdanov had simplified to the extreme the "complex physiological and pathological processes in the human organism" and that his view "did not correspond to modern medicine". He characterized Bogdanov's ideas as "mechanistic", "schematic" and at best "hypothetical". Shamov saw "mutual increased viability through blood exchange between old and young" as "medieval mysticism mixed with the dogma of mechanistic materialism". But he acknowledge, most likely to reassure himself before the next steps, that the concept of “physiological collectivism” had technically never been empirically falsified, so it could theoretically be still correct even if it was most unlikely. He wrote a letter to Bogdanov as a colleague in the research field of blood transfusion and wrote about his idea of a institute of blood research that might lay the groundwork to realize Bogdanov's vision.

Indeed only a few weeks later, Shamov got an appointment with the Chairman himself. It is not known what the two men talked about but Shamov was evidently successful. One week later he was ordered by the Commissariat for Health Protection to establish the Institute for Blood Transfusion. Shamov was forestalling any actual research of Bogdanov's idea concerning physiological collectives as long as possible, since he didn't expect favorable results. Bogdanov was at the time completely occupied with his function as head of state and quietly accepted the reports of Shamov that detailed the difficulty in building the institute. Those were ranging from finding a suitable building, devising an appropriate internal structure, hiring experienced personnel, producing the floor plans for separate research and clinical departments, as well as obtaining necessary supplies and equipment.

Shamov was first and foremost interested in practical medical concerns. This was reflected in the institutes statutes. First “to study and elaborate issues related to blood transfusion”, second “the theoretical and practical instruction of physicians through the organization of occasional and permanent courses of blood transfusions” and third “publication of scientific and popular literature and blood transfusion” and last but not least “the manufacturing of standard sera, as well as preparations, apparatuses and accessories for blood transfusion”.
While screening the relevant literature of blood transfusion Shamov found in October 1923 an article with the title “La regenaration de l'organisme humaine par les injections de sang” by a French physician named Helan Jaworski. In this article he claimed that he found a way “to transform a feeble old man into a flourishing youth” and that “it is sufficient to infuse him with young healthy blood.” Shamov tried to contact Jaworski but he never got an answer to his letters. But even if Jaworski's claims were sensationalist, now he had something to keep Bogdanov interested and satisfied. Finally in 1924 he could no longer delay making and actual verification of Bogdanov's theories. Shamov planned an experiment on mice first, since this way he could have large enough groups of test subjects, who also had a significantly shorter lifespan.

It was a fairly simple test arrangement that would simulate what Bogdanov, with his physiological collective, envisioned. The study involved connecting the circulatory systems of pairs of old and young mice via a surgical procedure, so that blood from the two mice comingled. The results he got were unexpected. First he found that young blood can rejuvenate old muscle. The team induced muscle damage in the older mice. Bathed in the presence of younger blood, the old muscles healed normally. In contrast, when old mice were connected to other old mice or none they healed slowly. The group also examined the livers of older mice connected to younger lab-mates. The cells that help liver tissue regenerate were less active in older animals, but again the cells responded more robustly when the livers in older mice were bathed in the younger blood. Clearly, something in the youthful blood revived the regenerative cells in muscles and livers.

But the effect didn't stop there. Further studies found that there was a substances in the blood of old mice that made young brains act older. These substances, whose levels rise with increasing age, appeared to inhibit the brain’s ability to produce new nerve cells critical to memory and learning. The findings raised the question of whether it might be possible to shield the brain from aging by eliminating or mitigating the effects of these apparently detrimental blood-borne substances, or perhaps by identifying other blood-borne substances that exert rejuvenating effects on the brain but whose levels decline with age.
In the end Shamov had to conclude that Bogdanov's predictions (not necessarily his explanations) were partially confirmed. The only thing the test refuted was the notion that young participants would benefit from old blood. Nevertheless this discovery came at the exact right time.

Shamov saw himself confronted with a major stumbling block to the regular application of blood transfusions in the Sovetunio, the shortage of blood. So far donors had to be found by the doctors themselves who wanted to perform blood transfusion. To remedy this, Shamov proposed the idea of introducing blood donating as form of “obligatory labor". He knew at this point that he would encounter resistance. But now that there were studies that indicate how beneficial the mass transfusion of blood could be for the entire nation, such a system looked a lot more justifiable.

F9d7W.jpg

Join the physiological collective!

And indeed over the next decade a system of blood banks and regular transfusions was established. The first who profited from the blood rejuvenation therapy were the old revolutionary cadre of the Bolshevik party. Successively more and more older and younger people were integrated into the physiological collective. Finally the discovery of stem cell therapy and its miraculous effects silenced even the last Bogdanov skeptics.

Notes and Sources:

These are real medical studies about the topic above:
http://med.stanford.edu/news_release...uary/rando.htm
http://med.stanford.edu/ism/2011/aug...ing-brain.html

A Martian Stranded on Earth: Alexander Bogdanov, Blood Transfusions, and Proletarian Science by N. L. Krementsov
(who did a lot more on the topic of "immortality research" history)

and

Red Star: The first Bolshevik Utopia by Alexander Bogdanov
 
Last edited:
I do everything I can do make the time jumping less confusing. Having a basic timeline of the political events lined out should help a lot. The real surprises of the timeline, at least in my opinion, lie in the tech- and cultural wank anyway.

Agreed. Still, it feels a bit weird.:p

I just had the time to look Meyer's work up and he is indeed a perfect addition for the timeline. He will certainly have a long and happy career ITL Germany.

Good! I'm happy I saw right when I thought you'd have liked his work.:)

For now I will concentrate on developing Tesla/Bogdanov and stuff related to them to build up the general world. But I would nevertheless appreciate everything you can send me on Italy. But I can't promise it will show up in the timeline soon.

I'll send you a PM as soon as I find a way to collect all relevant information in a logical sequence, including some opinions on where an avant-gardist Fascism could go if given more time. I know it'll have a very limited impact on the overall TL, but I'd be happy to give a little contribute if I can.:)

Merry Christmas by the way :).

And happy new year (even if I'm a little late!:D) By the way, I want to tell you that I enjoy your take on ATL history of blood transfusions immensely interesting and I'd like to hear more on Shamov's activity after 1924. And do you think politicians and factions of the scientific community in the West could become hostile to the idea of a physiological collective (great name BTW) in their nations due to its association with Bolshevism? Or will it be recognised as "politically neutral" because of its enormous usefulness?
 
I'll send you a PM as soon as I find a way to collect all relevant information in a logical sequence, including some opinions on where an avant-gardist Fascism could go if given more time. I know it'll have a very limited impact on the overall TL, but I'd be happy to give a little contribute if I can.
Great:)!Just take your time, as said before it might be a while until I get an Italy update done.
And happy new year (even if I'm a little late!) By the way, I want to tell you that I enjoy your take on ATL history of blood transfusions immensely interesting and I'd like to hear more on Shamov's activity after 1924. And do you think politicians and factions of the scientific community in the West could become hostile to the idea of a physiological collective (great name BTW) in their nations due to its association with Bolshevism? Or will it be recognized as "politically neutral" because of its enormous usefulness?

I guess it really depends. Some religious people will condemn any socialist bio-science as evil, some will see some kind of medical gap, demanding a better scientific education (kind of a sputnik situation) or at least a realistic assessment of the technology and some might even go so far to embrace everything including eugenics. The only thing I can say for sure is that there won't be the one, uniform opinion on the matter.
 
Talking Photons
Talking Photons

Bell's Greatest Invention?

"The photophone is the greatest invention I have ever made, greater than the telephone."
Alexander Graham Bell, in his last interview 1921 shortly before his death.

Although or especially because Bell had witnessed the beginning of the the new age of international radio telecommunication, he regarded the invention of his wireless communication system as an important visionary glimpse into the future.
It is beyond the scope of this essay to comment on the question if he was right or wrong with his assessment of his own legacy but it will offer an opportunity to look at the far reaching impact, this often overlooked invention had.

While honeymooning in Europe with his bride Mabel Hubbard, Bell likely read of the newly discovered property of selenium having a variable resistance when acted upon by light.
The discovery of photovoltaic properties of certain materials had been made was as far back as 1839 by A. E. Becquerel. But the experiment in question by Robert Sabine added something new. Sabine used a meter to see the effects of light acting on selenium connected in a circuit to a battery. Bell reasoned that by adding a telephone receiver to the same circuit he would be able to hear what Sabine could only see.

As Bell's former associate, Thomas Watson, was fully occupied as the superintendent of manufacturing for the nascent Bell Telephone Company back in Boston, Massachusetts, so Bell hired Charles Sumner Tainter, an instrument maker to assist him.
On February 19, 1880 the pair managed to construct a functional photophone. When the modulated light beam fell upon their selenium receiver Bell, on his headphones, was able to clearly hear Tainter singing Auld Lang Syne.

This so called photophone used crystalline selenium cells at the focal point of its parabolic receiver.
Selenium's electrical resistance varies inversely with the illumination falling upon it, i.e., its resistance is higher when it is in the dark, and lower when it is exposed to light. The idea of the photophone was thus to modulate a light beam: the resulting varying illumination of the receiver would induce a corresponding varying resistance in the selenium cells, which was then used to regenerate the sounds captured by the telephone receiver. The modulation of the transmitted light beam was done by a mirror made to vibrate by a person's voice: the very thin mirror would alternate between concave and convex forms, thus focusing or dispersing the light from the light source.
The resulting photophone functioned similarly to the telephone, except that the photophone used modulated light as a means of transmitting information, while the telephone relied on a modulated electrical signal carried over a conductive wire circuit.

Photophony1.jpg


Later in the same year they managed communicate clearly over the record distance of 213 meters. For now they were only using plain sunlight as their light source since practical electrical lighting had just been invented by Edison.

At the time of this breakthrough, Bell was immensely proud of the achievement and wrote to his father Alexander Melville Bell:

"I have heard articulate speech by sunlight! I have heard a ray of the sun laugh and cough and sing! ...I have been able to hear a shadow and I have even perceived by ear the passage of a cloud across the sun's disk. You are the grandfather of the Photophone and I want to share my delight at my success."

His euphoria even reached a point where he wanted to name his new second daughter "Photophone", which was subtly discouraged by his wife Mabel Bell (they instead chose the name Marian).
Bell transferred the photophone's intellectual property rights to the American Bell Telephone Company in May 1880.While Bell had hoped his new photophone could be used by ships at sea and to also displace the plethora of telephone lines that were blooming along busy city boulevards. His design however failed to protect its transmissions from outdoor interferences such as clouds, fog, rain, snow and such, that could easily disrupt the transmission of light.
Factors such as the weather and the lack of light inhibited the use of Bell's invention. Nevertheless Bell's newly founded Volta Laboratories continued to improve the photophone in the hope that it could supplement or replace expensive conventional telephone lines.

Bell himself however began focusing his interest and time on the field of aviation. A possible explanation for this strange turn away from what he later deemed his “most important invention” was later given by his wife (who was deaf):

"I really believe that the reason Dr. Bell did not follow up his invention of the photophone, or radiophone as it became afterward... and the reason he took up aviation instead was that I could not hear what went on over the radiophone but that I could see the flying machine."

As noted above the work on the photophone was continued by others in America. In Europe it was the German engineer Ernst Walter Ruhmer who from 1902 onwards would play an important role in its improvement. Ruhmer described his experiments in his book simply titled "Wireless Telephony". He was was generally satisfied with his first results from experimenting with a search light by the Schuket company as the light source and improved selenium cells as photodetectors.

"The transmission was in all cases good and in [the] last experiment surprisingly loud an clear."

Nevertheless he didn't manage to crack the 8 km sending distance limit. Later investigations in 1904 finally determined the factor that limited the range and hence the usefulness of optical telephony at that time:

"The large Schuktert searchlight, with its almost mathematically perfect parabolic glass mirror, silvered on the back, served the purpose excellently, and yet with this, even though a very small arc was used the divergence at great distances was very considerable.... There are no further factors which require consideration in the transmitter, only the discovery of a new source of light with a greater specific brilliancy could lead to a further advance.”

Ruhmer failed to increase the range of working of his system because, as he stated in his book the diameter of the searchlight beam was as much as several hundred meters at the range he was using. Given a divergence of the beam of 3 Grad the spread of the beam at 3 km is ca. 150 m. Thus if the diameter of the light gathering device is, say 30 cm, only about four millionth of the light flux from the searchlight will be incident on the device. The need for a light source, a laser - that produces a collimated beam of radiation was obviously essential for light telephony. Unknown to him, while writing these lines, the Serbo-Armerican inventor Nikolai Tesla had come to the same conclusion and was working on exactly that solution.

Notes and Sources

Communications: An International History of the Formative Years by R.W Burns
 
Last edited:
This is brilliant stuff to read. Serious research must have gone into this.

Thanks. Writing the timeline has been a great learning experience. The next "Tesla update" will deal with the effects on early quantum physics. Never would have thought o tackle that of all topic in a timeline, but here we go :).
 
Talking Photons II
Talking Photons II

The fantastic Ruby Ray

Ever since the night he received the “Martian Signal” in 1900 Tesla's mind couldn't find rest. It was his destiny to find the path towards fast and reliable interplanetary communication. Around this time Tesla had begun a regular correspondence with the India inventor Jagadis Chandra Bose, one of the diode's inventors.
The most common term used by Bose for his diode was the “galena coherer”. The names diode and triode we use today were established later. More interesting and important to the topic at hand, was the other name Bose had given the the device “artificial retina”. His initial design had indeed some similarities to an eye as he described:

By placing an ordinary glass lens...in the opening in the wall of the case-section...opposite the sensitive contacts...of the instrument and by throwing light upon the lens an immediate response is observed in the galvanometer, the needle of which is reflected in accordance with the spectral properties of the light thrown upon the contacts or artificial retina....”

3QDr3.png

Picture of Bose's Detector

The "artificial eye" inspired Tesla to test if this setup could work as an improved photoreceptor for a photophone. He mostly conducted these experiments aside from his main work, the improvement of radio communication. The idea of sending optical messages between stars is a lot less far fetched than it might seem on first glance. In fact scientist are working right now on laser based deep space communication. Sooner or later Tesla was confronted with the same problems Ruhmer had and he came to the same conclusion. However unlike Ruhmer, he didn't need to wait for a better light source.
Tesla had encountered a phenomenon roughly a decade ago that exhibited the qualities he was looking for in an illuminating device. The light source in question was his carbon button lamp, which he had developed as an substitute to Edison's incandescent light bulb. Its primary function was to serve as an efficient but ordinary light source. But it also had a secondary function as a laboratory apparatus. Tesla used the lamp for a variety of experiments one of them the “dematerialization” of matter. The following description was given by Tesla himself:

A small tube (….) has one of its ends drawn out into a fine fiber (..). The tube is placed in a brass socket T which can be screwed on the terminal T1 of the induction coil. The discharge passing through the tube first illuminates the bottom of the same, which is of comparatively large section; but through the long glass fiber the discharge cannot pass. But gradually the rarefied gas inside becomes warmed and more conducting and the discharge spreads into the glass fiber.
This spreading is so slow, that it may take half a minute or more until the discharge has worked through up to the top of the glass fiber, then presenting the appearance of a strongly luminous thin thread. By adjusting the potential at the terminal the light may be made to travel upwards at any speed. Once, however, the glass fiber is heated, the discharge breaks through its entire length instantly.”
(Light and other High Frequency Phenomena, Nikola Tesla 1893)

In shorter terms, Tesla “button lamp” was in essence a globe coated with a reflective material and a "button" of any substance most often carbon, attached to a source of power to vaporize material. Once electrifies the button would radiate energy which would bounce off of the interior of the globe and back onto itself thereby intensifying a "bombardment" effect. The button thus be “vaporized”. This was possible with almost any material including zicronia and diamonds. One day he made an interesting discovery:

Generally during the process of fusion magnificent light effects were noted, of which it would be difficult to give an adequate idea. Fig 23. is intended to illustrate the effect with a ruby drop. At first one might see a narrow funnel white light projected against the top of the globe where it produces an irregularly outlined phosphorescent patch. When the point of the ruby fuses the phosphorescence becomes very powerful; but as the atoms are projected with much greater speed from the surface of the drop soon the glass gets hot and tired and now only the outer edge of the patch glows.
In this manner an intensely phosphorescent sharply defined line, l, corresponding to the outline of the ruby drop is produced which spreads slowly over the globe as the drop gets larger.
(Alternate Currents of High Potential and High Frequency, by Nikola Tesla 1892)

Thus when asking himself how to get a coherent beam of light, he had a possible answer right there in his lab. Later he admitted that it was all a rather long shot, but at least it was worth trying. Thankfully for him the French chemist August Verneuil's had recently announced his method of creating large artificial ruby in 1902 and was publishing details outlining the process in 1904. Finely grounded purified alumina and chromium oxide were melted by a flame of at least 2000 °C, and recrystallized on a support below the flame, creating the large ruby crystals necessary for his experiments.

Over the next six years he would build the worlds first ruby laser. "Laser" is an acronym for light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation, which describes very well how a laser works.

Although there are many types of lasers, all have certain essential features. In a laser, the lasing medium is “pumped” to get the atoms into an excited state. Typically, very intense flashes of light or electrical discharges pump the lasing medium and create a large collection of excited-state atoms (atoms with higher-energy electrons). It is necessary to have a large collection of atoms in the excited state for the laser to work efficiently. In general, the atoms are excited to a level that is two or three levels above the ground state.

This increases the degree of population inversion (The population inversion is the number of atoms in the excited state versus the number in ground state). Once the lasing medium is pumped, it contains a collection of atoms with some electrons sitting in excited levels. The excited electrons have energies greater than the more relaxed electrons. Just as the electron absorbed some amount of energy to reach this excited level, it can also release this energy.
The electron can simply relax, and in turn rid itself of some energy. This emitted energy comes in the form of photons (light energy). The photon emitted has a very specific wavelength (color) that depends on the state of the electron's energy when the photon is released. Two identical atoms with electrons in identical states will release photons with identical wavelengths. Tesla himself had some intuitive understanding of what was going on but didn't understood the process completely:

The problem of producing light has been likened to that of maintaining a certain high-pitch note by means of a bell. It should be said a barely audible note; and even these words would not express it, so wonderful is the sensitiveness of the eye. We may deliver powerful blows at long intervals, waste a good deal of energy, and still not get what we want; or we may keep up the note by delivering frequent gentle taps, and get nearer to the object sought by the expenditure of much less energy.
(Alternate Currents of High Potential and High Frequency by Nikola Tesla 1892)

He was mostly guided by observation following a system of trial and error. The first thing in order to get a working “ruby ray” was to find a way for the ruby not to disintegrate while creating the light beam. Fortunately the population inversion could be initiated without electrifying and thus melting/vaporizing the ruby. All that was needed to get the desired effect of a "ruby ray" was a strong enough light source illuminating the ruby in combination the mirrors reflecting light back.

The next step was the transition from a bulb setup to a more proper laser. In order to do this the mirrors had to be attached onto the ruby. Tesla used a ruby rod that had flat polished ends which were silvered. The silver functioned as the mirror, while one end was made less reflective to allow some radiation to escape as a beam. The necessary light was provided by a high powered mercury-vapor lamps (1). Tesla unveiled his invention in February 1910, the twentieth jubilee of the photophone. Bell personally congratulated him to his invention, although it was obvious that it was more a proof of concept device than commercially viable at that point.

laser.jpg

Modern Version of the Ruby Laser

Still it was apparent that the “ruby ray” was different from normal light. It was coherent, “organized” which meant it was very directional. Thus perfectly suited for optical telecommunication, if it could be improved enough to be mass produced and shrunken.

Notes and Sources:

(1) In OTL Xenon flash tubes were used before mercury-vapor lamps. ITL Tesla is going to use the much better understood mercury lamps first, which had been known for at least a decade. Xenon lamps on the other hand were only invented in the OTL thirties by Harold Eugen. He wanted to improve high speed photography equipment. Here they may be invented a little earlier but not soon enough to be used in the ruby laser prototype. Making the necessary adjustments to the mercury vapor lamp should be feasible, since Tesla had quiet some experience in the matter.
 
Last edited:
Top