So are/were all those islands turkish majority?
No, but I'm of the opinion that Ethnicity should'nt mean shit.
If someone had made a map about greece annexing the usual stuff in thrace and anatolia and calling it fair people would have been screaming genocide so loud...
Considering the attitude of the Balkan states at the time period, their's a reason for that.
On the other hand the islands in question had been part of the Turkish plurality OE for centuries and did'nt face any genocide.
meanwhile we arent talking of the ottoman empire but of turkey in your map... a nation which committed several atrocities against its own greeks.
If you mean the so called 'Greek Genocide' I don't consider that a Genocide any nmore than the so call 'Armenian Genocide'.
Now, their were the population exchanges, bu those were, you know, negotiated between Turkey AND Greece.
There were also widespread violences, exactly as in the armenian genocide, as you said.
That said, why in the hell shouldnt the idea that greeks should live under turk rule just because you think it is right be considered bigotry? if i say that arabs should live under european rule it would be, in this forum.
Why should a country be ripped apart just because not everyone is the same ethnic group?
The reason is called self-determination, which is not even what we are talking about right now. What we are talking about now is: hy should a minority of one country be under another country with a different majority even if it doesnt want it? if i said that arabs or africans should be under european control, i would have been accused of bigotry. Why not you then?
Just them or the Sicilians, Francophones, and others as well? I am still having difficulty with finding whether or not being are being sarcastic on here.The difference is the land we're talking about were'nt colonies, it was an area that was an integral part of the state Turkey is the direct successor of for centuries.
And as for Self-Determiation, then Italy should let South Tyrol become independent or Join Austria.
The difference is the land we're talking about were'nt colonies, it was an area that was an integral part of the state Turkey is the direct successor of for centuries.
And as for Self-Determiation, then Italy should let South Tyrol become independent or Join Austria.
The difference is the land we're talking about were'nt colonies, it was an area that was an integral part of the state Turkey is the direct successor of for centuries.
And as for Self-Determiation, then Italy should let South Tyrol become independent or Join Austria.
Second, yes south tyrol should be austrian... and italy would gain so much from that.
First, nobody talked about colonies. I just talked of living under europeans for both blacks and arabs.
Third, u didnt answer my question: why a majority greek area, which doesnt want to be under the turks, should in ur mind be under the turks?
Aside........forcefully expelled.
You are a Turk, aren't you
Just them or the Sicilians, Francophones, and others as well? I am still having difficulty with finding whether or not being are being sarcastic on here.
No, I'm a Cascadian and natural-born American citizen of Spanish (Castillian specifically), British and North European (Dutch, Danish, Swedish and Norwegian) ancestry.