User Tools

Site Tools


shared_worlds:high_court_of_justiciary

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
shared_worlds:high_court_of_justiciary [2010/08/28 17:38] Demosthenesshared_worlds:high_court_of_justiciary [2020/02/05 01:18] (current) – Updating to new link format eofpi
Line 3: Line 3:
 ==== Overview ==== ==== Overview ====
 The **High Court of Justiciary** was formed as the sole-entity of the judicial branch of the Sandbox Republic. It was created on August 3, 2010, with the passage of the [[shared_worlds:establishment_of_an_independent_judiciary_bill|Judiciary Bill ]]. It is composed of three Justiciars who are nominated by Congress and appointed by the President. The First High Court was inaugurated on August 9, 2010. The **High Court of Justiciary** was formed as the sole-entity of the judicial branch of the Sandbox Republic. It was created on August 3, 2010, with the passage of the [[shared_worlds:establishment_of_an_independent_judiciary_bill|Judiciary Bill ]]. It is composed of three Justiciars who are nominated by Congress and appointed by the President. The First High Court was inaugurated on August 9, 2010.
 +
 +At latest count, the official thread is ninth on the list generated by Googling "ombni".
  
 ==== Justiciars === ==== Justiciars ===
Line 15: Line 17:
  
 ==== List of Decisions === ==== List of Decisions ===
 +
 ===Binding Judgements=== ===Binding Judgements===
-**LightInfa v. Lord Roem, TDM**, //10-4//, ([[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showpost.php?p=3538283&postcount=29|Complaint]]) - ([[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showpost.php?p=3539986&postcount=33|Response]]) - ([[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showpost.php?p=3540741&postcount=37|Decision]]) - (3-0 for Lord Roem & TDM)+**LightInfa v. Lord Roem, TDM**, //10-4//, ([[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/1/post-3538283|Complaint]]) - ([[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/1/post-3539986|Response]]) - ([[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/1/post-3540741|Decision]]) - (3-0 for Lord Roem & TDM
 + 
 +**Marix v. RAFF**, //10-5//, - (2-0 for RAFF) 
 + 
 +**Douglas v. Marix**, //10-6 & 10-7//, - (3-0 to Dismiss all Claims)
  
 ===Advisory Opinions=== ===Advisory Opinions===
Line 30: Line 37:
  
  
-**Transition to a Constitutional Government**, //10-3A, 2010// - Decided August 15, 2010+**Transition to a Constitutional Government**, //10-3A, (2010)// - Decided August 15, 2010
  
 * The Court held that: 1) A Referendum would have to be submitted to the people, 2) A referendum could be proposed by the President alone, 3) that a Referendum would have only two options (Approve/Reject) among other things. * The Court held that: 1) A Referendum would have to be submitted to the people, 2) A referendum could be proposed by the President alone, 3) that a Referendum would have only two options (Approve/Reject) among other things.
shared_worlds/high_court_of_justiciary.1283031496.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/03/29 15:17 (external edit)

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki