User Tools

Site Tools


shared_worlds:high_court_of_justiciary

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
shared_worlds:high_court_of_justiciary [2010/08/09 17:42] Demosthenesshared_worlds:high_court_of_justiciary [2020/02/05 01:18] (current) – Updating to new link format eofpi
Line 3: Line 3:
 ==== Overview ==== ==== Overview ====
 The **High Court of Justiciary** was formed as the sole-entity of the judicial branch of the Sandbox Republic. It was created on August 3, 2010, with the passage of the [[shared_worlds:establishment_of_an_independent_judiciary_bill|Judiciary Bill ]]. It is composed of three Justiciars who are nominated by Congress and appointed by the President. The First High Court was inaugurated on August 9, 2010. The **High Court of Justiciary** was formed as the sole-entity of the judicial branch of the Sandbox Republic. It was created on August 3, 2010, with the passage of the [[shared_worlds:establishment_of_an_independent_judiciary_bill|Judiciary Bill ]]. It is composed of three Justiciars who are nominated by Congress and appointed by the President. The First High Court was inaugurated on August 9, 2010.
 +
 +At latest count, the official thread is ninth on the list generated by Googling "ombni".
  
 ==== Justiciars === ==== Justiciars ===
Line 14: Line 16:
 The Court was created as part of the new constitutional structure within the Sandbox Republic. The Court was created as part of the new constitutional structure within the Sandbox Republic.
  
-==== Major Decisions === +==== List of Decisions === 
-No decisions have been made as of August 9.+ 
 +===Binding Judgements=== 
 +**LightInfa v. Lord Roem, TDM**, //10-4//, ([[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/1/post-3538283|Complaint]]) - ([[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/1/post-3539986|Response]]) - ([[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/1/post-3540741|Decision]]) - (3-0 for Lord Roem & TDM) 
 + 
 +**Marix v. RAFF**, //10-5//, - (2-0 for RAFF) 
 + 
 +**Douglas v. Marix**, //10-6 & 10-7//, - (3-0 to Dismiss all Claims) 
 + 
 +===Advisory Opinions=== 
 + 
 +**Constitutional Basis for Binding Decisions**, //10-1A, (2010)// - Decided August 9, 2010 
 + 
 +* The Court held that without a Constitution, no binding decisions could be given 
 + 
 + 
 +**Constitutional Ratification**, //10-2A, (2010)// - Decided August 12, 2010 
 + 
 +* The Court held that the people must ratify a Constitution, not simply political actors 
 + 
 + 
 +**Transition to a Constitutional Government**, //10-3A, (2010)// - Decided August 15, 2010 
 + 
 +* The Court held that: 1) A Referendum would have to be submitted to the people, 2) A referendum could be proposed by the President alone, 3) that a Referendum would have only two options (Approve/Reject) among other things. 
  
 ==== See Also ==== ==== See Also ====
shared_worlds/high_court_of_justiciary.1281390127.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/03/29 15:18 (external edit)

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki