Your region in Dies the Fire?

At the time of the Change I was in Sorrento, Italy on a class trip. Only a brief trip from the starving hordes of Napoli. I think I would have been quite thoroughly screwed.
 
anyway... Mr. Stirling, one thing that always bothers me in these situations is how would the survivors keep their grains growing after the first year? especially in the quantiles that would be needed for even the groups the size of the Mackenzies or the Bearkillers?

-- for wheat and barley, this isn't as much of a problem. The seeds will yield something; you just have to accept a steep drop in what you get per-acre, and select the best results for next.
 
Most of the city dwelling hordes will probably die in those cities, about a quarter because they are old and helpless, others from disease, others from killing each other and others because they are too dim to run. Many will try and fight other people for food, but after losing the early "food fights" will basically be helpless as they grow ever weaker.

-- the problem is that even a minority of a very large number is still a large number in absolute terms. It depends on how many large cities there are relative to the total area. W. and central Europe is just SOL that way.
 
-- the problem is that even a minority of a very large number is still a large number in absolute terms. It depends on how many large cities there are relative to the total area. W. and central Europe is just SOL that way.

While you are probably correct for the most part concerning west and central Europe (though I still think that there are likely to be at least a few small, more remote areas that survived), the same does not apply for much of North America. Even in the area east of the Mississippi, the population density is not that of Europe and there should be small groups and some small communities well scattered over most of that area.
 
While you are probably correct for the most part concerning west and central Europe (though I still think that there are likely to be at least a few small, more remote areas that survived), the same does not apply for much of North America.

-- which is why there are a lot more survivors there.
 
So, I haven't actually read this book, but I've grasped the basic principle from Wiki...but what date does it take place? Someone said 1998?
 
I assume Gotland (being a sparsely populated and big island) would make it through.. (Guess it did if I recall the books correctly, since the flags for Norland sounded very much like the Visby CoA.. with the old classic "Gutenses signo xpistus signatur in agno". Perhaps one of the most arrogant statements ever made in a Coat of arms..


No, I'm not not living there, I'm a Stockholmer...
 
I assume Gotland (being a sparsely populated and big island) would make it through.. (Guess it did if I recall the books correctly, since the flags for Norland sounded very much like the Visby CoA.. with the old classic "Gutenses signo xpistus signatur in agno". Perhaps one of the most arrogant statements ever made in a Coat of arms..


No, I'm not not living there, I'm a Stockholmer...


-- yup, Gotland did well. So did Bornholm and some of the other Baltic islands, and some remote parts of northern Norway and Sweden. Jutland, the main Danish islands, southern and central Sweden, and the areas around the larger Norwegian cities are toast.

About a quarter of a million people survive. After the first Change Year there's a good deal of shifting about, since you'd have to be insane to try making a living farming in some of those spots when there's much better farmland available further south.

Norland ends up taking over the former Germany and some points south.
 

mojojojo

Gone Fishin'
How would the remaining tribal cultures of the Amazon fare and what would they be up to culturaly (anything along the lines of what you hinted the mongols would be up to?)
 
Well I wouldn't be too badly off. My town is a bt outside Glasgow, and I would be able to make it into the hills (which are about 5 miles away) and on into the highlands. There would be the question of feeding myself of course - maybe get myself a fishing rod...
 
How would the remaining tribal cultures of the Amazon fare and what would they be up to culturaly (anything along the lines of what you hinted the mongols would be up to?)

-- that would depend on how genuinely primitive they still were (shotguns are _really_ popular with 'em) and how far away they were from ordinary Brazilians. Brazil still has a lot of quasi-subsistence peasants alongside (or in areas away from) the huge machine-worked estates which have been spreading there in the past generation.
 
Part of the problem isn't necessarily the number of people in a region, it is the survival skills that we possess.
My experience with computers/MIS would definitely not be a necessary skill in the new age. So those who could, would find themselves burdened with a lot of people who couldn't.
It would not be a pleasent time.......
People living in rural communities and on farms would be in the best shape, but even agriculture has become dependent on technology that would not exist.
 
Fishing villages would seem to be well placed as well. I've been asking some questions about the local area, for stuff I'll post later.
 
both farms and fisher villages would face the same problem in that they suddenly have to replace mechanical power with human/horse power... the trick will be in finding the right mix... too many, and you can't gather enough food to feed them all... too few and you can't get things done fast enough... I could probably make myself useful on a farm or ranch, I do know something about that kind of work... however, at the time of the event, I was close to 40, and not in great physical shape, so it'd be hard adjusting...
 
Surprisingly One area that will probably do better than expected is Costa Rico.
As the metro areas of new England and Mid Atlantic have expanded over the last 30~40 years, most of the Amish in the Areas, have immigrated to Costa Rico.
There is also a very large Mennonite community in the Country.

This appears to have lead to several others of the -Back to the Simple life- Groups to move there also.
 
Top