Himmler wasn't even in the top 5 of succession until 1944. From 38 on Göring was the official successor of Hitler.well, Himmler was next in line iirc, and then it might be Goering, so....
Himmler wasn't even in the top 5 of succession until 1944. From 38 on Göring was the official successor of Hitler.well, Himmler was next in line iirc, and then it might be Goering, so....
which is still pretty badHimmler wasn't even in the top 5 of succession until 1944. From 38 on Göring was the official successor of Hitler.
Well, maybe not war-winning but it sure wouldn't hurt. I mean, they are said to have prioritized extermination above all else but how much it interfered with war waging I'm not really sure; were the same resources really being competed for? They recovered some of the financial resources by liquidating the victims' possessions and also by using them for forced labor.Would all the resources used during the Holocaust be directed elsewhere? Wouldn't help the Nazis win the war?
which is still pretty bad