I'm not sure Germany would be treated better at all, and perhaps worse.
All of this would still be seen by the victorious allies in the context of an aggressive "normal" Germany that flaunted the Versailles Treaty, rearmed, broke agreements, and was the clear aggressor in starting a Second World War which killed millions. There would be no "Nazis" upon which "normal" Germans could heap blame. I suspect that the allies would decide that Germans were just a bad lot altogether and that they were too soft in 1919 and not make that mistake again. Allies might decide that, this time, Germany would be dismembered and stay that way. The key perpertrators of the aggressive war would be tried by allied tribunals. Since presumably they would not be tried for "crimes against humanity" since the various ethnic holocausts would not have occurred, fewer would be sentenced to death, but rather imprisoned for life.
Parodoxically, this war might result in a modern world that was less accepting of Germany than OTL. When you are found totally guilty of the most horrible crimes imaginable, it is really easy to sincerely accept blame and de everything possible to repent. Plus, Germans could point their fingers, not at themselves, but "nazis". Would Germans in this time line react this way, or would they see more sympathy in their former rulers, who after all, were just "regular" Germans upset about Germany's treatment? Assuming Germany was ever reunified, which I think could be less likely in this TL than ours, would its chancellor see nothing wrong with visiting war memorials dedicated to WW2 war criminals like the Japanese prime minister does? Would Germans be secretely building nuclear weapons? Would this Germany be a leader in establishing a democratic, peaceful (some might say "spineless") European Union together with France? Without Nazis, could there be an effective "de-nazification" program that truly created a liberal democracy in Germany?