You'd probably see development of aircraft, but attitudes on how they should be used probably would be the same as 1914, barring someone coming along between 1914 and the start of the Great War with unusual ideas. Tanks seem unlikely to be developed at all.
No trucks? Am the only one confused here?
A-H was another matter.
No, you are not but otherwise he is spot on.
Back to the OP´s question. No Anglo-German naval arms race would have helped keep Britain friendly but Russia was actually getting more stable and more powerful in the yeras before the war. But starting a fight with Germany was not high on their agenda, A-H was another matter.
Agreed.
Unfortunately for Russia, a war with A-H will probably mean a war with Germany.
No trucks? Am the only one confused here?
No, you are not but otherwise he is spot on.
I believe trucks were developed during the first world war to better transport wounded, supplies, fresh troops etc to the front lines and from the front lines.
No.
The truck is one of the most obvious possible applications of the internal combustion engine, in some shape or form. There are also multiple places which would suggest it, agricultural tractors for instance (around since the 1850s), cars themselves (which obviously existed prior to WWI), and so on. Tanks, too...you will see a different evolutionary path, for sure; they're more likely to evolve out of armored cars. But you will most likely see tracked AFVs sooner or later.
EDIT: In any event, the first trucks appeared only shortly after the first cars, so well before WWI. They weren't very good, of course, but they were still trucks.
Well then, my high school history teacher deserves some hate mail.
Well then, my high school history teacher deserves some hate mail.