WW2 with Soviet Union and Russian Empire

OK, I'm playing with this idea for while.
Russian civil war somehow ends in the stalemate. The Soviets failed to defeat Whites in Siberia, and the Whites failed to recapture Moscow and Petrograd.
In 1920 Lenin and Kolchak signed a peace agreement and divided a former empire.

West of the Urals is the Soviet Union, and east of the Urals is restored Russian Empire. Central Asia is also divided, so Russian empire secured its food supplies.
The history of the Soviet Union is the same as in the OTL. Hitler comes to power, as in OTL, Stalin comes to power as in OTL.

During interwar period Soviets and Whites are living under bitter peace. Russian Empire is pretty similiar to fascist Italy, emperor (Cyril, I guess) is pretty much puppet of Kolchak's government. Would RE sign Anti-comitern pact? Would it align with Japan? Would US and UK help Soviets?

So nazis are coming, Poland is divided, and Barbarossa starts as in OTL.

What happens next?
 
Both sides would probably rather kill the entire Russian population, including themselves, than split the country. Even if this were plausible, then the butterflies on Western politics knock the Nazis right out of the way. I can't see any way to make this work.
 
Yeah, I know this is hard to achive, but let's assume for a moment that this happened.
Nazis are product of complicated internal German situation. Two Russian states would have no effect on the unstable and weak Weimar Germany.
 
Yeah, I know this is hard to achive, but let's assume for a moment that this happened.
Nazis are product of complicated internal German situation. Two Russian states would have no effect on the unstable and weak Weimar Germany.

Actually, it would; without the looming Red shadow hanging over Europe, Fascism has significantly less appeal to the "traditional" right-wing elements, and domestic Leftist movements in those counteries would lack a forgien patron that would make the threat of them taking over the state by force real enough that said center-right powers that be would feel the need to make an alliance with the radical right rather than establish a "dictatorship of the center" like the Baltic States did IOTL. Also, realistically dividing Central Asia on a north-south axis is going to be next to impossible to enforce, especially considering how nomadic much of the population is.

For the sake of arguement, however, any ultra-nationalist regime in Siberia is going to be incredibly weak, full stop. There's just not enough population, infrastructure, tapped natural resources, ect. to build a strong base out of, and they'd be unable to accept any treaty that would involve signing over Russian land to the Nazis (Who, let's remember, based their eastern campaign on the prospect of securing control of the territory and natural resources of European Russian to achieve autarky for the German race).The bigger impact is likely to be on the Asian theature, as Tokyo is likely going to be the only source of succor and the main commerical partner for the Russian Empire, including owning the lion's share of what capital investments (IE industry) there is along the Pacific rim, as well as removing the main reason for co-operation between Germany and Japan and by changing the power dynamics making friction between the Chinese and Russians over borders/territory more likely. Off the top of my head, I'd assume that means Germany remains aligned with the Nanjing regime and you end up with a three-way power struggle for influence in China between the Soviet, Nazi, and Japanese blocs
 
Top