Hashasheen
Banned
Had they been worked out to their fullest extent, could any of them have worked?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wunderwaffen
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wunderwaffen
Lots of strange Allied projects too - I remember seeing a picture of a British giant wheel thing that was meant to hurl itself over Normandy fortifications...
Of course some of the idiot seeming projects actually worked; for instance the bat-bomb.
Lots of strange Allied projects too - I remember seeing a picture of a British giant wheel thing that was meant to hurl itself over Normandy fortifications...
(snip)
A better question is: Could thay have changed the eventual outcome of the war? The answer to that is a resounding NO!
Centralization has severe side effect of giving an undue weight to ideas generated by scientists heading the research effort, as there's no competition to prove them wrong. Even USSR (as much as it was crazy about centralization and organization) preferred to use competing teams, if possible at all. Single-team approach was used only to close known technological gaps (for example, there was no point to have multiple teams to work on nukes, as rough idea was known to be working and it was just a matter of fine-tuning technology).What would be a better POD is if the Nazis actually had a centralized, organized research effort, rather than having competing efforts
Yes I know. But, if you think about it, US produced not more but less designs per ounce of gold invested. They (Americans) excelled in manufacturing, but no streamlining of German research process is going to change THAT.it is widely accepted that German research effort was in shambles due to ridiculously comical mismanagement.
Naturally the problem is that according to Clay Blair the Type XXI's in service in 1945 were a total mess and would not have been as combat durable as often presented.