ar-pharazon
Banned
So in 2010 the WSJ had a rather interesting article which speculated on the consequences of Saddam Hussein not being overthrown. In short it involved a lot of nuclear proliferation.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703882304575465721991599994
The article is very interesting and somewhat dystopic in its explanations.
What if by 2015 Saudi Arabia, Iran, Turkey, Egypt, Morocco, and Syria had nuclear weapons.
With Libya, Sudan, Tunisia, Algeria, working towards getting nuclear weapons.
With al-Qaeda having already gotten one or working on it.
How would this situation have affected wider world politics and middle eastern politics?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703882304575465721991599994
The article is very interesting and somewhat dystopic in its explanations.
What if by 2015 Saudi Arabia, Iran, Turkey, Egypt, Morocco, and Syria had nuclear weapons.
With Libya, Sudan, Tunisia, Algeria, working towards getting nuclear weapons.
With al-Qaeda having already gotten one or working on it.
How would this situation have affected wider world politics and middle eastern politics?