thomas best bet is to concentrate on one corps then swing around and try to move around to behind the fieldworks or close to them.
man writing battle scenes sounds like a hassle
William F WTwo chapters ago.
When William was born, his mother and father spent some time discussing whether to call him William Fenwick Williams or William Frederick Williams. In TTL they chose to call him William Frederick Williams. (In OTL William Fenwick Williams.) This caused very few butterflies initially but overtime more things changed. So I believe the initial POD for TTL was the choice of names by William's parents. (Just speculating, of course)Shoot, you're definitely right that it is supposed to be William Fenwick Williams. Where did I put the wrong name down so I can fix that?
Churchill won't exist in this timeline will he ?an american and English lord marrying for love was unlikey IOTL.Here it will be politicaly impossible for a man with prime minsterel ambitions.
When William was born, his mother and father spent some time discussing whether to call him William Fenwick Williams or William Frederick Williams. In TTL they chose to call him William Frederick Williams. (In OTL William Fenwick Williams.) This caused very few butterflies initially but overtime more things changed. So I believe the initial POD for TTL was the choice of names by William's parents. (Just speculating, of course)
Churchill won't exist in this timeline will he ?an american and English lord marrying for love was unlikey IOTL.Here it will be politicaly impossible for a man with prime minsterel ambitions.
He was a nobleman of the highest circles (as he was the younger son of a Duke) and she was a rich American woman so they were NOT exactly married for love or their wedding so unusual for that timeframe. The circumstances of Winston’s birth were without doubt mildly scandalous as his parents most likely had not waited for the end of their families’ business discussions about their wedding for consummatingOh definitely not our Churchill. That said, the circumstances of his birth (mildly scandalous for the period) were very unique. I have plans for the Churchill family, but they're not quite so far reaching as the Churchill we knew.
I think, although it could never be proven or disproven, that if a timeline divided, they would diverge very quickly. It's be like putting a stick in a river and taking it out again, there would be a wave of changes spreading out from that point and rather quickly, not a H2O molecule would be in the same place. So in a timeline like this, someone like TR, born in 1958 would still exist, but the minutiae of life, would diverge. He would be unlikely to marry the same woman (although given a relatively small pool of upper class New Yorkers, there's a small chance in this case.) For someone like Lloyd George, born 1863, there still might be a Lloyd George, since his parents were probably married in 1861, but it wouldn't be the same Lloyd George, because it would be essentially statistically impossible for his parents to have sex at exactly the same time and the same sperm to meet the same egg.I'm limiting myself to anyone born between 1862 and 1865 will escape being eaten by butterflies (unless their biological parent happens to eat a bullet or catch a disease between then) simply because I have no desire to count months between the POD in 1861 and because it's annoying to count out dates before 1865. So the cardinal rule is anyone born after 1865 will not exist.
If they're born after that you won't see them in the timeline at all I'm afraid!
ah fair enough.bit disappointed but there's lots of other cool characters .a few of the soilders fighting now will live to see almost the end of the century and maybe even fight in the ww1 equivalent if there is one.
just curious how far do you plan this TL to go?
sorry if you answered before.
I think, although it could never be proven or disproven, that if a timeline divided, they would diverge very quickly. It's be like putting a stick in a river and taking it out again, there would be a wave of changes spreading out from that point and rather quickly, not a H2O molecule would be in the same place. So in a timeline like this, someone like TR, born in 1958 would still exist, but the minutiae of life, would diverge. He would be unlikely to marry the same woman (although given a relatively small pool of upper class New Yorkers, there's a small chance in this case.) For someone like Lloyd George, born 1863, there still might be a Lloyd George, since his parents were probably married in 1861, but it wouldn't be the same Lloyd George, because it would be essentially statistically impossible for his parents to have sex at exactly the same time and the same sperm to meet the same egg.
As to whether a WWI might have occurred, there might be a similar war, with similar belligerents, because there probably was a kind of inevitability. It's a pity we can't do experiments. For example, what would have happened if Antonio López de Santa Anna had been executed by the Texans after the battle of San Jacinto, which was probably 95% likely at the point in time he was captured. Texas would still likely have maintained its independence, been annexed by the USA, and a Mexican-American War still eventuated of the issue of the Nueces strip. The Mexican-American War may have gone similarly, but would have not gone the same, in part because Santa Anna led the army. Or maybe it wouldn't have, because a different Mexican political structure might have offered to recognise an independent Texas with the Nieces River as the border. The border certainly wouldn't be in the same place, because it was simply a line drawn on a map by Nicholas Trist.
@EnglishCanuck
Well, this is very good news!
I'm whising you luck with the novel project. I was sincerely hoping you'd do it and I am not disapointed by that sneak peek, it sounds different than the TL and I like it. I will be buying this book for sure when the time comes and I can already say I'll keep an eye on your forum until then. If I may ask, have you settled on a title?
Since it's almost time, I will also grab the opportunity to wish you and your loved ones an happy New Year. I hope you're well in these troubled times, let's hope 2021 brings us a little less bad news!
Best regards,
Well bud, just let us know when there's a release date and I'll toss an order in.My sincere thanks! Wishing you a safe and happy New Years to all your loved ones as well!
As for a title, the first novel is called, Wrapped in Flames for convenience sake. The second is tentatively titled, At All Hazards while I'm tossing around ideas for the third such as Fire All Around Us or Writ In Letters of Blood.
Well bud, just let us know when there's a release date and I'll toss an order in.
Same when you have a release date will order
I loved the vignette there, people sometimes forget how quickly things can go from zero to crazy when there's a shouting match happening.
Monck is more of a "hands off" leader. The civilian government and British military are leading their spheres and Monck doesn't have a whole lot to do because the Brits and Canadians are generally in agreement on most things given they're being invaded. One of the chapters lists who's in the war cabinet, so it would worth it to take a peek.dumb Question maybe but where is the GG in all this?
In this time period wouldn't they be taking more of am active role in defense and politics?
dumb Question maybe but where is the GG in all this?
In this time period wouldn't they be taking more of am active role in defense and politics?
Monck is more of a "hands off" leader. The civilian government and British military are leading their spheres and Monck doesn't have a whole lot to do because the Brits and Canadians are generally in agreement on most things given they're being invaded. One of the chapters lists who's in the war cabinet, so it would worth it to take a peek.