So you're saying that he's Ferret Face......
The period term is "dough face" as I understand it, but absolutely there will be those who ascribe him to be some kind of treacherous rodent...
Rodents everywhere recoil at the comparison.
And I think you mentioned there will be some presidents who will be viewed as worse than McClellan. If I didn't misremember, that's going to be a rough few years for the United States.This is George McClellan we are talking about, a man who chronically forgot one of the most important lessons of warfare, that the enemy gets a say in war. He seems to have made plans that often assumed the enemy would either act in exactly the way he anticipated, or otherwise agonized over having a lack of crushing superiority. His war record was never impressive, and I do think that his political record would be even worse.
And I think you mentioned there will be some presidents who will be viewed as worse than McClellan. If I didn't misremember, that's going to be a rough few years for the United States.
Been a lurker for awhile but I'll mention with how bad of a president McLellan is how much worse of a president his successor is and trend of democratic presidents being trashfires with Buchanan, McLellan, and likely a democratic successor could this be the breaking point of the democratic party breaking apart allowing the Republicans or the populist retaking control of the White house and steering the nation away from this mess. Just speculation not anything really
Given all that is happening in the US and will happen in the future of this story, I'm surprised that the US hasn't collapsed into different nations because of a series of bad Presidents. I know the US becomes an economic powerhouse by the turn of the 20th century but the author did not state for how long. I still think that it would collapse after the Great War, else Churchill would not have titled his AH story 'If there was a United States', suggesting that it ceased to exist until reunification in the 1960s based on a previous post. I mean, that is the only way Canada can be truly safe with dismemberment of the US, not just a military defeat.
Holy smokes!
This is shaping up to be one hell of a rising, and not in a good way!
Whatever happens, even if only half of the Fenian plan is carried out, the consequences are going to be enormous. I just hope it won't be an absolute bloobath...
With McClellan track record and your hints at his successor I'm gonna say no and with all the bumbling his administration Is doing right now and all the stuff that happened with the Indians and with butler and the fenians I don't think little Mac is gonna be the remembered as a Rutherford Hayes type figure more a Andrew Johnson or his previous democratic presidential counterpart Buchanan as being one of the bumbling/worst next to his successor. Oh well that's just speculation but what's going on with US grant cause I want him to save the Union from the stupidity of little Mac and his successor. But one can dream or speculate.Yeah, between 1864 and 1874 are going to be a rough decade for the United States.
Then we come to the Rise of the New Men.
It's not bad speculation! Though the Republicans are currently divided and largely disunited over issues like foreign policy, monetary policy and the end of the war, the Democrats are not using their unity to do much better. How this shapes the political parties we know and love from OTL will be interesting to say the least! The building blocks of a successful Democratic Party are there, but can McClellan and his successors really implement them?