alternatehistory.com

would there be a yorktown battle if de Grasse and the French fleet had not been able to journey to Chesapeake Bay?

OTL, Washington wanted to assault NYC, but was dissuaded because de Grasse was coming from the Caribbean to coordinate with a battle on Cornwallis (digging in at Yorktown). de Grasse was only able to journey to Chesapeake because the Spanish agreed to protect the Caribbean while most of the French fleet went north. the Spanish also raised significant funding in Cuba for the mission. Let's say the Spanish, for whatever reason, don't back the French at that juncture. Reasons don't need to make sense.

So, no French fleet to defeat and blockade Yorktown. Additionally, de Grasse dropped off some troops for the land siege. Sans the fleet, does Washington stay in NY, perhaps attempting a (likely disastrous) assault? Does Yorktown simply become a failed siege by much smaller American forces, leaving cornwallis free to resume terrorizing the mid atlantic once his troops are rested and resupplied? What happens then? Most folks always point out that no French fleet means Cornwallis can be evacuated (still seen as a loss for the Brits), but is that faulty logic? Would Washington be persuaded to join the siege if Cornwallis' lines of sea communication are still unencumbered?
Top